-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13-07-15 10:11, Rene Moser wrote:
Hey
Since we rebuild our communication stack (slack, irc, ML, ...) I
would bring up some discussion about the noise in the dev ML.
I like to be in dev ML but I am not that interested in
notifications
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/575#issuecomment-120883355
LGTM :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
On 13-Jul-2015, at 1:41 pm, Rene Moser
m...@renemoser.netmailto:m...@renemoser.net wrote:
Since we rebuild our communication stack (slack, irc, ML, ...) I would
bring up some discussion about the noise in the dev ML.
I like to be in dev ML but I am not that interested in notifications
about
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/571#issuecomment-120906494
test logic makes sense; LGTM
waiting for travis
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/571#issuecomment-120903118
@karuturi @DaanHoogland Added unit tests for CPVM allocation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/575#issuecomment-120897166
Thanks both, I pushed another UI change. Please see it too. This change
allows admins to say if they want usernames with a domain (extracted from the
IDP server).
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/573#issuecomment-121137019
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1361/
--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2178
originally caused by:
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by upstream project build-master
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/575#issuecomment-121131795
Squashing and merging commits.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/571#issuecomment-121133952
Although RAT build status is showing ABORTED, the report is clean. Also the
build failed due to some random test failure. Since travis is green, I am going
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/578#issuecomment-121138178
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Hi Daan,
Please go ahead and change the name.
Thanks for notifying.
-Jayapal
On 13-Jul-2015, at 8:45 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Jayapal,
I didn't notice this before but in PR 568, in commit
638885a9de0fd651351f0b16cbdd9fc30c4a187d, you added a method name
starting
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/253/
--
Started by upstream project build-4.5-simulator build number 308
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project build-4.5 build number 498
originally caused by:
Started by an SCM
Github user bhaisaab closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/575
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/571#issuecomment-121138730
Manually closing PR. I did a rebase to do away with unnecessary merge
commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found
with Coverity Scan.
3 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan.
32 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the
recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
New
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1360/
--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2177
originally caused by:
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by upstream
Github user koushik-das closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/571
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2015 05:30 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
LGTM but what PR did I miss here, Wido?
Uh, oops. None. I completely forgot!
Won't happen again :)
Wido
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:59 PM, wid...@apache.org wrote:
kvm: Write Libvirt instead of
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1359/
--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2176
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project build-master build number 2462
originally caused by:
Started by an
LGTM but what PR did I miss here, Wido?
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:59 PM, wid...@apache.org wrote:
kvm: Write Libvirt instead of LibVirt
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/commit/24f8e66e
Tree:
Jayapal,
I didn't notice this before but in PR 568, in commit
638885a9de0fd651351f0b16cbdd9fc30c4a187d, you added a method name
starting with capital 'A' to citrixrecource base. Is this on purpose
and can we change it to adhere to convention?
public boolean
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1358/
--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2175
originally caused by:
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on
LGTM
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:02 AM, nitt10prashant g...@git.apache.org wrote:
GitHub user nitt10prashant opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/579
CLOUDSTACK-8626 :[Automation]fixing test/integration/component/test_p…
…s_max_limits.py for lxc
I agree with Daan,
Lazy consensus QA is not going to improve code quality. If anything we're
highlighting a structural issue with the amount of resource available to review
these PRs - which is a different issue and would need looking at as such as it
is fundamental to our push for improved
Hey
Since we rebuild our communication stack (slack, irc, ML, ...) I would
bring up some discussion about the noise in the dev ML.
I like to be in dev ML but I am not that interested in notifications
about builds on PR, PR comments, and Jenkins builds.
I am suggest to make a seprate ML for
All
We've had some great talks submitted for Dublin so should now be able to put
together a really exciting agenda , but we still have room on the schedule for
some more, so...
Please consider submitting a talk: The CFP closes in 2 days
Github user gauravaradhye commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/532#issuecomment-120846548
@runseb Sorry for delayed response, I was away for two weeks.
As said by Sanjeev, the tests were wrongly tagged. required_hardware =
true implies test
28 matches
Mail list logo
