Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/661#issuecomment-128284375
@koushik-das I've backported your fix from master to 4.5 using the PR #263,
please review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/660#issuecomment-128293184
ok. There are lot of ifs in that part of the code which makes it difficult
to read. I will have to try it to understand fully for which I dont have time
now. So, I
GitHub user manuiiit opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/662
CLOUDSTACK-8711: public_ip type resource count for an account is not
decremented upon IP range deletion
Probleam:
--
When you add an IP range and associate it
GitHub user ustcweizhou opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/663
CLOUDSTACK-8638: install update_host_passwd.sh in cloudstack-common
installation
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Rajani, Wido,
I think what Rohit says makes sense. If we put it in 451to452 and release
4.5.2 in the coming week and 4.6.0 at the end of the month we are alright.
Except for Wido that is, he will have to fix his DB's removing the
autoincrement in the id of regions by hand.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at
We'll live with it this time I'd say ;-) Thanks for bringing it up!
Regards, Remi
On 06 Aug 2015, at 08:09, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Fair enough
Do you want me to revert this one or are we OK to just live with it?
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Remi Bergsma
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/547#discussion_r36490405
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/db/PrimaryDataStoreDaoImpl.java
---
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
protected
Github user manuiiit commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/630#issuecomment-128602113
@mike-tutkowski I did not find any other possibility where
createPhysicalDisk would return null unless is called from
NfsManagedStorageAdaptor class.Please
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/547#issuecomment-128594438
Aside from a couple minor comments, LGTM. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/630#issuecomment-128604281
That is very well true, but I worry that a comment that specific would
not be updated should the time come when another adaptor does, in fact, return
null
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/547#discussion_r36490618
--- Diff:
engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/provider/DefaultHostListener.java
---
@@ -71,6 +74,17 @@ public
Can you please share the MS logs ?
I think the VR might failed on configuring rules due to this VR stop.
Observe the MS from the VR start onwards to VR stop.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 07-Aug-2015, at 3:18 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
Hi,
We wanted to do some tests against master
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/547#discussion_r36490233
--- Diff: core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/ModifyStoragePoolAnswer.java ---
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
public class ModifyStoragePoolAnswer extends Answer
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/654#discussion_r36490932
--- Diff:
services/console-proxy/server/src/com/cloud/consoleproxy/vnc/packet/server/RawRect.java
---
@@ -50,26 +52,27 @@ public void
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/654#discussion_r36490966
--- Diff: utils/src/com/cloud/utils/nio/NioConnection.java ---
@@ -334,6 +333,7 @@ protected void processTodos() {
try
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/654#issuecomment-12859
Aside from my break question and indentation request, LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/644
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Fair enough
Do you want me to revert this one or are we OK to just live with it?
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Remi Bergsma rberg...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
Hi Mike,
Yes, I want everything to go through a PR.
Otherwise:
- there are no Travis CI and other tests run
- we need to
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/657#issuecomment-128337719
I will merge this to master and keep the bug open so that it can be fixed
in 4.5.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/657
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/661#issuecomment-128342511
Changes LGTM. Make sure travis is green.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/661#issuecomment-128347115
@koushik-das thanks, looks like Travis failed due to some timeout issue and
in other case due to dependency/jar issue. Will force push again to re-kick the
travis
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/659#issuecomment-128469563
LGTM. I tested it on a VM running on KVM and it works fine now with
enable.storage.migration=false. The VM restore itself also still works.
Please see
The Apache web server listens only on the eth0 IP.
I added the 169.* address to eth0 and changed the Apache config to listen on
that IP as well.
While the Apache Webserver now receives the request, it returns a 404. Fiddling
with the .htaccess file could fix that, but now that’s a bigger change
Excellent tip! Didn’t notice this in the docs before:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.5/virtual_machines/user-data.html
From: Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.commailto:car...@reategui.com
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/660
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
How's about this:
Super-Trivial:
:)
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
H Mike,
If you find a good title for such a trivial change bucket pr it makes
creating release notes easier as well. Try to group them by mental state or
character (can you say
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/660#issuecomment-128443925
Sounds good, @karuturi I'll go ahead and check the code in. Thanks for the
comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/657#issuecomment-128373260
Looks like some confusion is going on here; the changes need to go into:
setup/db/db/schema-451to452.sql that I had suggested earlier. If you do that,
then people
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/663#issuecomment-128386362
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user devdeep commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/635#issuecomment-128292255
@DaanHoogland When prepareTemplate is called, it either falls into
prepareTemplateInOneStoragePool if one primary has to be seeded with the
template; or
H Mike,
If you find a good title for such a trivial change bucket pr it makes
creating release notes easier as well. Try to group them by mental state or
character (can you say that in English?)
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Sounds good
I
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/661#issuecomment-128300894
Did functional testing with two KVM hosts, across two Advance Zones with
VLAN isolation:
![screen shot 2015-08-06 at 2 34 24
On 05-08-15 18:37, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On 05-Aug-2015, at 11:01 am, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org
mailto:raj...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Rohit,
Any update on the release timelines for 4.5.2? I think based on the
current
upgrade path, we have to do 4.5.2 before 4.6.0. Else upgrade path
GitHub user bhaisaab opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/661
CLOUDSTACK-8301: Enable configuring local storage use for system VMs â¦
â¦at zone level
Backported from #263 for 4.5 branch
More information on
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/661#issuecomment-128280936
Created PR, still testing on KVM/4.5
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user kishankavala commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/657#issuecomment-128306138
LGTM if 4.5.2 is released before 4.6.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Sounds good
I could always cache those kinds of trivial changes and create a single
PR for them later, too.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:29 AM, Remi Bergsma rberg...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
We'll live with it this time I'd say ;-) Thanks for bringing it up!
Regards, Remi
On 06 Aug 2015, at
BTW you can speed up cloud-init to look for CloudStack first/only by
overriding the datasource_list. The way I do it is by adding a file in my
templates to the /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d directory with only CloudStack in
it:
echo datasource_list: [ CloudStack ]
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/661#issuecomment-128288397
Tests fixed, hoping this will pass Travis now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/657#issuecomment-128293895
I read it as this PR is good for master. If thats the case, can I get some
+1s please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Would it not work to assign the address 169.254.169.254 on the VR?
Erik
Den torsdag 6. august 2015 skrev Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com følgende:
Today the metadata / userdata server is retrieved by the guest from
http://address of DHCP server/latest/meta-data and
42 matches
Mail list logo
