Re: [DISCUSS] Why we MARK packets?

Rohit, My comments inline. On Apr 19, 2018, at 1:52 AM, Rohit Yadav > wrote: Nevermind, found the use of custom routing tables. In case someone want to refer, hints are here:

Re: [DISCUSS] Why we MARK packets?

Nevermind, found the use of custom routing tables. In case someone want to refer, hints are here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2514#issuecomment-382510915 Jayapal and others - I've another one, is there a way to do routing without marking packets at all, even in case of VRs with

Re: [DISCUSS] Why we MARK packets?

Hi Jayapal, Thanks for replying. Can you point me to the code/rules that use the marking for packet routing (in case of additional public nics) in latest 4.11 or master branch? Don't we have routing tables and nat rules for routing across interfaces? This started from reviewing Rafael's PR,

Re: [DISCUSS] Why we MARK packets?

Hi, Below are the uses of marking packets. 1. Marking is required to route the packets into correct interface in case additional public interfaces in VR. 2. Packets with VPN marking are accepted in first place of NAT POSTROUTING. Without marking these packets source ip will be replaced with

[DISCUSS] Why we MARK packets?

All, I could not find any history around 'why' we MARK or CONNMARK packets in mangle table in VRs? I found an issue in case of VPCs where `MARK` iptable rules failed hair-pin nat (as described in this PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2514) The valid usage I found was wrt

Re: Community opinion regarding Apache events banner in CloudStack's website

Done. Site updated. If we feel that it requires changes, we can do so later. On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote: > I wish that there was this much excitement about the problems in the > installation docs! > > Lets make a decision and live with

Re: Community opinion regarding Apache events banner in CloudStack's website

I wish that there was this much excitement about the problems in the installation docs! Lets make a decision and live with layout for a few weeks and see how placement number 3 affects the community and how many people who did not plan to go to ApacheCon decide to go because of the placement

Re: Management of Transifex resources

Can somebody add me to the Spanish team? I am not able to add myself. Or, can someone port the keys updated here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2571/files? On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Folks, > Today I was going to

Management of Transifex resources

Hello Folks, Today I was going to upload new keys to transifex and translate some strings proposed in [1]. It looks a little messy the Transifex resources. As I user, when I get there, I have no idea where I should work. Can we have/use a single resource file there? If we only use the

Re: Community opinion regarding Apache events banner in CloudStack's website

I vote 4 On Wed, Apr 18, 2018, 7:13 AM Rafael Weingärtner, < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am confused as well. Here goes a link with all image suggestions [1]. The > tally so far is the following: > >- Option 1 (banner in the middle of the main CloudStack section)- 1 >vote

Re: Community opinion regarding Apache events banner in CloudStack's website

My vote is for 3. On 4/18/18, 5:13 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner" wrote: I am confused as well. Here goes a link with all image suggestions [1]. The tally so far is the following: - Option 1 (banner in the middle of the main CloudStack section)- 1

Re: Community opinion regarding Apache events banner in CloudStack's website

I like option 3 the best. On 4/17/18, 12:43 PM, "Dag Sonstebo" wrote: A biased +1 for option 3 from me. Regards, Dag Sonstebo Cloud Architect ShapeBlue On 17/04/2018, 19:42, "Rafael Weingärtner" wrote:

Re: Community opinion regarding Apache events banner in CloudStack's website

I am confused as well. Here goes a link with all image suggestions [1]. The tally so far is the following: - Option 1 (banner in the middle of the main CloudStack section)- 1 vote (Rafael) - Option 2 (a new section called “Apache events”)- 1 vote (Gabriel) - Option 3 (Banner aligned

Re: Community opinion regarding Apache events banner in CloudStack's website

Can we list the options and their voting numbers? I am a bit confused right now. I like the one that is left aligned under the text and keeps the logo on the right full size. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 10:41 PM Nitin Maharana, wrote: > +1 for the third option. I think It

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack graceful shutdown

As we are already using a list management server API calls to handle the scripting of the shutdown/upgrade/start, I manually backported the code: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2578 On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:31 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ron, that