+1 (binding), considering the latest changes, I’ve did a quick test and checked
the smoketests results, all looking good.
Bobby.
From: Rohit Yadav
Date: Monday, 28 June 2021, 13:58
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ,
us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.15.1.0 (RC3)
Hi
You confused me David - that API seems new in 4.15 and is related to the
SECONDARY storage, not primary storage - but is great to learn new stuff
every day!
cheers,
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 18:22, David Jumani
wrote:
> You set it as readonly via the updateImageStore API
>
You set it as readonly via the updateImageStore API
From: Rakesh Venkatesh
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 7:14 PM
To: users ; dev
Subject: Disabling a storage pool
Hello folks
Is there a way to disable a particular storage pool so that it won't be
used for
i was able to hack the db to make it work with storage and service offering
tags but thats not useful all the time in production
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 5:23 PM Andrija Panic
wrote:
> (you can also hack the DB... just saying...)
>
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 17:20, Rakesh Venkatesh
> wrote:
>
> >
(you can also hack the DB... just saying...)
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 17:20, Rakesh Venkatesh
wrote:
> Thanks all for the response. I was on 4.14 and didnt see this. will check
> it in 4.16
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 5:12 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
>
> > yes.
> >
> > There is an icon on the UI which
Thanks all for the response. I was on 4.14 and didnt see this. will check
it in 4.16
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 5:12 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
> yes.
>
> There is an icon on the UI which does exactly the same.
>
> -Wei
>
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 16:16, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Op
yes.
There is an icon on the UI which does exactly the same.
-Wei
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 16:16, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> Op 29-06-2021 om 15:44 schreef Rakesh Venkatesh:
> > Hello folks
> >
> > Is there a way to disable a particular storage pool so that it won't be
> > used for further
joschi36 commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/32#issuecomment-870644101
@rhtyd @davidjumani I also vote to move this out of v1.0, so we finally can
get the first release done. Never intended to be in 1.0
--
This is an
Op 29-06-2021 om 15:44 schreef Rakesh Venkatesh:
Hello folks
Is there a way to disable a particular storage pool so that it won't be
used for further volume allocation? I don't want to enable the maintenance
mode as that will turn off the VM's whose volumes running on that pool. I
don't want
dredknight commented on pull request #215:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/215#issuecomment-870341452
@andrijapanicsb I believe this is done now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
sureshanaparti commented on a change in pull request #223:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/223#discussion_r660340873
##
File path: source/adminguide/reliability.rst
##
@@ -78,25 +156,8 @@ HA features work with iSCSI or NFS primary storage. HA with
Hello folks
Is there a way to disable a particular storage pool so that it won't be
used for further volume allocation? I don't want to enable the maintenance
mode as that will turn off the VM's whose volumes running on that pool. I
don't want to use a global setting also since this will come
sureshanaparti commented on a change in pull request #223:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/223#discussion_r660378898
##
File path: source/adminguide/reliability.rst
##
@@ -126,6 +187,150 @@ that you want to dedicate to HA-enabled VMs.
a crash.
sureshanaparti commented on a change in pull request #223:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/223#discussion_r660371331
##
File path: source/adminguide/reliability.rst
##
@@ -61,6 +61,84 @@ still available but the system VMs will not be able to
sureshanaparti commented on a change in pull request #223:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/223#discussion_r660350789
##
File path: source/adminguide/reliability.rst
##
@@ -61,6 +61,84 @@ still available but the system VMs will not be able to
sureshanaparti commented on a change in pull request #223:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/223#discussion_r660349696
##
File path: source/adminguide/reliability.rst
##
@@ -61,6 +61,84 @@ still available but the system VMs will not be able to
dredknight commented on pull request #215:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/215#issuecomment-870341452
@andrijapanicsb I believe this is done now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
sureshanaparti commented on a change in pull request #223:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/223#discussion_r660340873
##
File path: source/adminguide/reliability.rst
##
@@ -78,25 +156,8 @@ HA features work with iSCSI or NFS primary storage. HA with
18 matches
Mail list logo
