good luck Nicolas,
Are you going to call a code freeze?
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 3:33 PM Nicolas Vazquez <
nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I’d like to put myself forward as the release manager for 4.16.0.0 and my
> colleagues Suresh Anaparti and Rohit Yadav as the co-RMs.
>
thanks Suresh for the hard work,
Are there any remaining actions or arisen issues on this?
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 12:23 PM Suresh Anaparti <
suresh.anapa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The default branch has been renamed to 'main' (from 'master'), for the
> following CloudStack project
grumble
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:45 PM Slavka Peleva
wrote:
> Great to hear that, Rohit, even if you don't complete the book ;) And
> Andrija will survive the interview 😇
>
> I can't wait to watch the interviews with you :)
>
> Kind regards,
> Slavka
>
--
Daan
This is a potential religious debate, I think it makes the most sense to
try and make the provider optional and let the operator or even the
end-user decide. I see how this is an extra challenge, but does it make
sense?
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:24 AM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> All,
>
> We've histori
Junxuan,
Did you get/find an answer? if you did, can you share it here? other people
might want to know as well (and I wouldn't be able to tell them ;)
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 6:09 PM Junxuan Wu wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As the official coding period of GSoC is drawing near,
>
> What are the gene
I added Rene, you should be able to as well now, @Rohit Yadav
.
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 12:08 PM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Rene,
>
> I've pinged ASF-infra on their slack channel. I'm not sure who's the cwiki
> admins with PMCs, maybe @Daan Hoogland<mailto:daa
Welkom Wei, I hope to enjoy your vast understanding of the system even more
now.
On Thu, 6 May 2021, 07:11 Pearl d'Silva, wrote:
> Welcome Wei!
>
> Regards,
> Pearl
>
> From: Suresh Anaparti
> Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 10:18 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
+1 (binding, Though I'm not sure if this is not a regular lazy consensus
vote)
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 1:43 PM Suresh Anaparti <
suresh.anapa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Following the discussion thread on renaming default git branch name and
> inclusiveness [1], I would like to start a
great thanks Suresh,
I think we should merge these with extreme prejudice so we can smoothen our
way of working in time before the 4.16 release pressure kicks in.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:02 PM Suresh Anaparti <
suresh.anapa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is the list of CloudStack r
Abhishek (and others),
I don't think we should make any changes to output parameters unless
they do explicitly not what they describe. It make sense to add
parameters with more explicit names/description. I can not read from
this thread if that is the consensus, so I just add my view to the
a
http://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.15/apis/addNicToVirtualMachine.html
kind regards,
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 7:20 PM Support Admin <
support.ad...@technologyrss.com> wrote:
> *Hi,*
>
> I am successfully setup AD zone with security group. And all instance
> connect using guest public ip. Bu
parabens e successo, Gabriel.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:50 AM Abhishek Kumar <
abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Congrats Gabriel 👍
>
> From: Paul Angus
> Sent: 18 March 2021 02:40
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ;
> us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: priv.
ird one, I extended my thoughts on that:
export in cloudmonkey command format for recreation of a part of one's
cloud.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:48 PM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Guys, I have some ideas but never got any of my ideas to fruition in the
> past so I'd like to donate/discuss the
have a look at
https://www.shapeblue.com/a-beginners-guide-to-cloudstack-networking/ and
let uys know if that helps.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:38 PM Support Admin <
support.ad...@technologyrss.com> wrote:
> *Hi,*
>
> I needed Advanced networking guide for create Advanced Zone. Than means
> networ
Guys, I have some ideas but never got any of my ideas to fruition in the
past so I'd like to donate/discuss them before taking myself too serious:
1. authentication plugins for public authentication providers like
google/microsoft/facebook/...
2. a new usage subsystem design that basis itself on ev
check package and checksums, all ok. Further based on Abhishek's results:
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:26 AM Abhishek Kumar <
abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> I've tested RC packages while running smoke tests and some manual
> operations.
> Configuration:
>
> * CentOS
conculeagues,
I've gone through all the issues adding milestones to them, but there is
now 39 in a milestone called "unplanned" [1]. I'd like some help in
prioritising those. And feedback on my approach.
Some of them are maybe too epic to put a milestone on, others just done
have traction. Can ever
certainly not your privkey.pem. whether it is chain.pem or fullchain.pem
depends but as you say you are using let's encrypt I think you don't really
have a full chain yourself. no harm in trying both I'd say.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 9:47 AM Support Admin <
support.ad...@technologyrss.com> wrote:
Can you be more specific to what you observe? I see errors in your logs,
but those at approximately 17:40 are the same as those at =/- 06:30. Have
you investigated network (i.e used tools like telnet, ping, tracerout and
investigated the ipconfig settings)
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 2:28 PM Support A
As a draft announcement and discussion item the text for an announcement
mail below. Note that the features list is far from complete and any
suggestions on that will be incorporated.
*The Apache Software Foundation Announces Apache**®** CloudStack**®** v4.15*
The Apache CloudStack project is pl
LS,
After the last vote yesterday, it was decided we have a blocker. I created
a new release candidate today. We now have an RC4, The changes (other than
bundling) are only significant for ceph users.
We are voting for the new UI and the main code.
The candidate release branch is 4.15.0.0-RC2021
I will revert the version updates if and as soon as we are ready to merge a
fix for the new blocker.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 3:04 PM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> sorry to second guess this announcement, but after the vote an issue was
> decided to be a blocker anyway. Please refrain from mer
sorry to second guess this announcement, but after the vote an issue was
decided to be a blocker anyway. Please refrain from merging a while more,
thanks.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:37 AM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Finally, both master and the new 4.15 branch are open for merging given
> our
not covered by jenkins/travis/trillian tests.
>
> -Wei
>
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 13:18, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > ok, can you expand Wei?
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:51 AM Wei ZHOU wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Daan and Rohit,
> > >
> &
ok, can you expand Wei?
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:51 AM Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Daan and Rohit,
>
> Sorry I would like to recall my +1.
>
> I think the ceph issue is a blocker.
>
> -Wei
>
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 12:18, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> >
Finally, both master and the new 4.15 branch are open for merging given our
merge guidelines. I wish all of us much productivity.
--
Daan
I forgot to rename the thread so for archive purposes, this.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:18 AM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After 72 hours (+the holidays), the vote for CloudStack 4.15.0.0 *passes* with
> 4 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes.
>
> +1 (PMC / binding)
> * Wei, Boris,
after 24 hours
to give the mirrors time to catch up.
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 5:43 PM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> LS,
> After fixing another few blockers, we have an RC3, The changes (other than
> bundling) are mostly interesting for those working with templates and on
> vmware.
>
>
o be added.
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Daan Hoogland
> 发送时间: 2021年1月4日 14:57
> 收件人: users
> 抄送: dev
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>
> looks good Jerry,
> Are you making a PR? It seems to me that this would not be a blocker and
> shoul
port", disk));
> int port = 0;
> String _xmlPort = getAttrValue("host", "port", disk);
> if ( ! _xmlPort.isEmpty()) {
> port = Integer.parseInt(_xmlPort);
>
> ","wait":"0"}}] }
> 2021-01-03 13:15:43,241 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
> (UgentTask-2:null) (logid:) Executing:
> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/network/security_group.py
> get_rule_logs_for_vms
>
>
>
>
>
> After
installation or perform an installation step.
> * We've added support for CentOS8 with 4.15 but CentOS8 will EOL
> in Dec 2021 (https://wiki.centos.org/About/Product).
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Daan Hoogland
>
thanks for starting this discussion thread @Giles Sirett
. Personally I'd like to not "vote" on
anything. Especially not at this moment. I think a discussion is good
though. My personal (and most definitely not my business) take on this is
to go for fedora. It is unlikely it will find business tra
LS,
After fixing another few blockers, we have an RC3, The changes (other than
bundling) are mostly interesting for those working with templates and on
vmware.
We are voting for the new UI and the main code.
The candidate release branch is 4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632. The UI is still
separate but as
Most users don't need to do any
> > separate installation or perform an installation step.
> > * We've added support for CentOS8 with 4.15 but CentOS8 will EOL in
> > Dec 2021 (https://wiki.centos.org/About/Product).
> >
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> &
LS,
After a user called a blocker we worked this weekend on his PR for it, and
have an RC2 as before,
We are voting for the new UI and the main code.
The candidate release branch is 4.15.0.0-RC20201214T1124. The UI is still
separate but as agreed upon before this will be merged in coming rele
ion or perform an installation step.
> * We've added support for CentOS8 with 4.15 but CentOS8 will EOL in
> Dec 2021 (https://wiki.centos.org/About/Product).
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Daan Hoogland
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 16:33
"setup/dev/advanced.cfg"
>
> What I miss however, where to specify API client configuration, like the
> URL of the instance and access/secret keys?
>
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Marvin+-+Testing+with+Python#MarvinTestingwithPython-Compili
open until the 18th (of December!)
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:43 AM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> LS,
> Long overdue we have a set of artifacts to call version 4.15.0.0 \o/
>
> We are voting for the new UI (former secret project name primate) and the
> main code pack. the commit
LS,
Long overdue we have a set of artifacts to call version 4.15.0.0 \o/
We are voting for the new UI (former secret project name primate) and the
main code pack. the commitish are
main code: acce0c9ee733b0e343fe01a5972016f355f3a560
ui code: d9e5e65781b88caa3b58d1874190ed5a4cce5239
The candidate
his.
> I don't believe there are any other outstanding items from what I can see.
> Looks like we're ready!
>
> -Si
>
> ____
> From: Daan Hoogland
> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 8:14 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][RELEASE]
Good summary Rohit,
Just one addition, in my original reaction I meant the following:
Option D: Introduce a new cloudstack-ui rpm/deb pkg which is independent.
Create a new "virtual" package cloudstack that depends on both
cloudstack-ui and cloudstack-management (and consequently
cloudstack-common
Paul, not much reaction so far, :(
I would prefer to have them both be installed separately when I `require
cloudstack` or ` install cloudstack`, but still be able to install
them separately if i want them on different machines i.e. `install
cloudstack-management` or alternatively `install cloudst
Hello again,
I have just merged the last critical item for 4.14 and 4.15. All other PRs
are (or should be) moved to future milestones.
I think we are ready for releases. thoughts anyone?
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:45 PM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> as of now there are one PR marked as critical
tps://serverspec.org/
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:34 AM wrote:
>
> > Hi there Dan,
> >
> > we work to setup the test environment and will share relevant output
> > fragments with the limitation we can't share complete logs publicly.
> >
> >
cloudstack/pull/4413
>
> -Wei
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 12:23, Andrija Panic
> wrote:
>
> > These have been consistently unreliable for many releases, nothing to do
> > with you, afaik.
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 10:09, Daan Hoo
17, 2020 at 7:48 PM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Devs, we have 11 open PRs in milestone 4.15 and 2 in 4.14.1. Not all of
> them are urgent (lots of severity:minor actually) and some are
> enhancements. Can we agree to move all of those to 4.14.2, 4.15.1 or 4.16?
> if not please give th
welcome Suresh, happy coding (may the source be with you)
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:48 PM Sven Vogel wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has invited Suresh Anaparti to become a committer and we are pleased
> to announce that he has accepte
happy rides Nguyen, hope you enjoy
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:49 PM Sven Vogel wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has invited Nguyen Mai Hoang to become a committer and we are pleased
> to announce that he has accepted.
>
> Please join m
welkom Rakesh, keep on it!
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:49 PM Sven Vogel wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has invited Rakesh Venkatesh to become a committer and we are pleased
>
> to announce that he has accepted.
>
> Please join me in c
welcome Shwstppr ;)
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:48 PM Sven Vogel wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has invited Abhishek Kumar to become a committer and we are pleased
> to announce that he has accepted.
>
> Please join me in congratulating
Devs, we have 11 open PRs in milestone 4.15 and 2 in 4.14.1. Not all of
them are urgent (lots of severity:minor actually) and some are
enhancements. Can we agree to move all of those to 4.14.2, 4.15.1 or 4.16?
if not please give them some love urgently. We are slacking traditionally
and personally
sounds like I am on my own. Any body cares to chime in?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:21 PM Nicolas Vazquez <
nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> LGTM
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nicolas Vazquez
>
> ____
> From: Daan Hoogland
> Sent: Thur
ate backwards compatibility
> though..
>
> Bobby.
>
> On 11.11.20, 21:28, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>
> devs,
> Investigating an new organization of test categories , I found that
> our framework in use, nose, is no longer in maintenance. Its maintainer has
>
devs,
Investigating an new organization of test categories , I found that our
framework in use, nose, is no longer in maintenance. Its maintainer has stopped
his support in 2017. As it is quite stable it has slipped our attention, but it
is urgent that we discuss and choose a way forward. There
ards,
> Rafael
>
> On Tue, 2020-10-20 02:49 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
> > People,
> > A quick call for volunteers.
> > As we are approaching code freeze once more test effort is going to be in
> > high demand, anybody that has any stake in open PRs, please cont
Please all keep an eye out. Something was merged (probably by me) that
broke the tests for VPCs [1] I have seen it in at least three smoke test
runs for different PRs and I don't know what to revert/fix. I'll be looking
at it but do appreciate help.
[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/42
People,
A quick call for volunteers.
As we are approaching code freeze once more test effort is going to be in
high demand, anybody that has any stake in open PRs, please contribute your
efforts. It is unlikely that the release manager will be able to do a good
fraction of the work so every help is
with it... makes sense?
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 11:10 AM David Jumani
wrote:
> Sounds good. And do you think it would be better to have the user provide
> the API keys or create a service account and use its keys?
> ____
> From: Daan Hoogland
> Sent
sal was to simplify it for the user so they can just pass
> min / max size as well as API keys if needed (so no tweaking a yaml file)
> > The scaleAPI could have a flag to indicate whether it enables
> autoscaling or not, and if enabled, the additional fields provided.
> >
David,
as a general principle an API called scale should not be used to
configure autoscaling of in my opinion.
So option 1 seems the best to me (an submitYamlForKubernetes-API?) However
instead of requiring an yaml we could just ask for the required fields
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 12:51 PM David
In general, I'm fine with giving karma to any user on request for those
abilities. I don't think a trial for a limited set of users makes sense.
And I don't think the PMC or committers will be able to control and revert
on abuse. we'll need infra for both awarding and retracting.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2
e. for
> me thats okay.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sven Vogel
> Apache CloudStack PMC member
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Saturday, 07/11/2020 at 21:17 Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
>
> Did you do any verification, Sven?
>
> O
checked checksum,
did a test on darwin on
- local and remote profiles
- basic list users and filter.
looks good: +1 (binding)
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 9:17 PM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Did you do any verification, Sven?
>
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 8:24 PM Sven Vogel wrote:
>
>>
Did you do any verification, Sven?
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 8:24 PM Sven Vogel wrote:
> your changes can always be relied upon :)
>
>
>
> +1 for me Rohit
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sven Vogel
> Apache CloudStack PMC member
>
>
>
> On Friday
sorry Rohit, I have not given this any attention at all. Hopefully over the
weekend...
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 5:28 PM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Bump - kindly participate.
>
> We require lazy concensus with at least three PMC +1s to go forward.
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
>
> ___
I had a look at the travis output, there was a log too long, which could
mean there is a problem but often is a false positive. We used to be able
to restart individual testsuites, but these are disabled by travis. I am
starting integration tests.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:53 AM li jerry wrote:
great initiative Sina, I did leave a comment on the PR, about
configurability.
in short two worries:
1. an operator uses a different log host than the MS (i.e an ip/hostname
config)
2. an operator wants to not use the feature (i.e. a boolean flag)
I'm not sure how much this would require, but it se
Thanks Bobby,
All, I've been closely working with Bobby and seen the same things. Does
anybody see any issues releasing 4.14 based on this code? I can confirm
that it is not Pavernalli's UEFI PR and we should not create a new PR to
revert it.
thanks for all of your patience,
(this is me giving a b
On Mon, 18 May 2020, 23:12 Daan Hoogland, wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 May 2020, 22:01 Marcus, wrote:
>
>> ...
>
>> Does it only affect new templates, or is there a risk that an existing
>> template out in vSphere could suddenly cause problems?
>>
> The boot m
Hey Marcus, i tried to partially disable it today but it seems I can still
corrupt a system so, I'll create a block for all of the VMware
functionality tomorrow.
On Mon, 18 May 2020, 22:01 Marcus, wrote:
> The issue sounds severe enough that a release note probably won't suffice -
> unless there
LS, please take note of the following;
[CVEID]:CVE-2019-17562
[PRODUCT]:Apache CloudStack
[VERSION]:Apache CloudStack all versions up to 4.13.0.0
[PROBLEMTYPE]:buffer overflow exploit
[DESCRIPTION]:A buffer overflow vulnerability has been found in the baremetal
component of Apache CloudStack.
Hey Rohit,
This is a lot to take in at once. We have discussed some of those off line
but let me give my initial answers to your discussion points inline.
Hopefully those more directly involved and with more at stake can give some
input as well.
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 3:03 PM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
Liridon,
"Not owner of usage job, skipping" means there is a PID in the record for
this job that isn't the current process. If recognise this and have
remedied by setting the process id to null in the record. I'm sure there is
some underlying issue that you hit though. Just a workaround.
On Mon, M
looks good Wei,
I have minor questions about the implementation but please go ahead.
I see you introduce a scope and also fields for network, vpc *and*
loadbalancer UUIDs. Is this not redundant? scope and UUID would seem enough
as the scope already defines the object type of the UUID, not?
You cre
+1 (binding)
verified signatures, too much involvement in teh fixing and release process
itself to give further independent opinion.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 8:54 AM Boris Stoyanov
wrote:
> [+1](binding)
>
> I've done upgrade tests with the following environments and they all were
> successful:
never mind found it 3959
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:03 AM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Jerry,
> you say you have a PR but point to the issue. Please give me the PR so I
> can review. It sounds like a blocker indeed and we need to fix this.
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:45 AM li jerry
Jerry,
you say you have a PR but point to the issue. Please give me the PR so I
can review. It sounds like a blocker indeed and we need to fix this.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:45 AM li jerry wrote:
> Hi Andrija Panic,
> we encountered this bug in production
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack
People,
This to give anybody busy testing a heads-up. I haven't heard from
anyone so a general mail to all. We are expecting a second RC as we
found some bugs. Please report quickly if you have found issues while
testing 4.13 or master/4.14 so we can include fixes if you have them.
so far any ext
good journey Suresh, hope you settle quick and fare well.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:28 PM Pavan Kumar Aravapalli <
pavankuma...@accelerite.com> wrote:
> All the Best Suresh.
>
>
> Regards,
> Pavan.
>
>
> From: Suresh Anaparti
> Sent: 14 April 2020 15:03
> To: dev
I'd love it to have a nightly @Gabriel Beims Bräscher
and in general i like the idea. Maybe (running in front of myself here) it
can have a build from custom commitish?
anyway :+1:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 12:46 PM Gabriel Beims Bräscher <
gabrasc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello @dev,
>
> Since rele
welcome Sven and thank you Paul, may we all overcome and prosper!
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 9:34 AM Paul Angus wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> It gives me great pleasure to announce that ASF board last night
> accepted our PMC's nomination of Sven Vogel as the next VP of the
> project.
>
> As I hand ove
ke Friday the 13th - means nobody would commit anything 😀
> >
> > On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 19:29, Daan Hoogland
> > wrote:
> >
> >> And leave master open for disaster all of Friday the 13th? You hero! 😉
> >>
> >> On Fri, 6 Mar 2020, 18:37 Giles Siret
And leave master open for disaster all of Friday the 13th? You hero! 😉
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020, 18:37 Giles Sirett, wrote:
> In case there is anybody superstitious, could we make it Saturday 14th at
> 00:01 ? 😊
>
>
> Kind regards
> Giles
>
> giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London B
Evgeniy,
you can see that there are PRs out for the milestones 4.14 and 4.13.1 on
github. When we get enough support to have these tested and merged we can
release.
4.14: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/12
4.13.1: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/11
On Tue, Feb 18, 202
ny disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents
> is strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately
> and then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you.
> > Am 14.02.2020 um 19:45 schrieb Daan Hoogland :
> >
>
gt;
> Rohit Yadav
>
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> https://www.shapeblue.com
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Daan Hoogland
> *Sent:* Friday, February 14, 2020 17:33
> *To:
devs, I thought I had already sent a mail about this but i cannot find it.
I'm sure i had mentioned it somewhere (probably on github).
this is a follow up on [1] and hopefully you'll agree, a slight improvement.
here it comes:
At the moment we are creating PRs with a [WIP] or [DO NOT MERGE] tag i
Hello devs,
I know most of us have been using jenv (http://jenv.be) to develop in
parallel on different branches in the past. In view of our recent upgrade
(and our ongoing support for 4.13), I've been taking this up with INFRA and
they suggested that we use the maven toolchain plugin instead. I op
wilkommen mein herr Nguyen,
hope you enjoy and expand your involvement.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 9:03 AM Hoang Nguyen wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> My name is Hoang and I'm working for Ewerk. It is my great pleasure to
> have a chance to join Cloudstack Primate project. It has been a wonderful
> ti
all good Rohit,
I just did a pull on both branches and no merge happened, so i think you
did the right thing.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 6:54 AM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> All,
>
> I made a forward merge error and accidentally merged master into 4.13,
> rather than the opposite (while using Github, should
t; >> > From: Andrija Panic
> >> > Sent: 03 February 2020 16:35
> >> > To: dev
> >> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1
> >> >
> >> > This issue is here from before (i.e. not new to 4.14), so we can argue
>
People,
A ticket has been raised as a blocker but i don't think anybody here has
the resources to fix it. It is a regression of kinds, and a known issue but
in my not so humble opinion won't block anybody from using a future
release. The Issue [1] describes the problem and a PR [2] gives a partial
gave you the default access, ping if it doesn't suffice (blogs/delete/etc)
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:47 PM Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can someone please grant me Star Wars karma to be able to edit pages on
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
>
> My email address is: andrijapa...@apach
I ref'd Nux to the ui fix. I think he is good (still definite enough for
you is it Andrija?)
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 8:21 AM Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Err, it's either fixed or not?
> @Abhishek Kumar ?
>
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 14:24, Nux! wrote:
>
> > It is backed up to sec stor.
> > @shwstppr he
Got some Darrin, ping back if it isn't enough.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:26 PM Darrin Hüsselmann <
darrin.husselm...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have done some work on a Cloudstack feature and would like to add it to
> the wiki. May I have karma please? My username is spaceman1984.
>
>
are you committer Pavan, and did you register your google account in apache
ldap? if so contact infra for help, otherwise, you are refused on purpose.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:33 PM Pavan Kumar Aravapalli <
pavankuma...@accelerite.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am facing below exception while pushing
correction, you github account, not your google account!
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 1:42 PM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> are you committer Pavan, and did you register your google account in
> apache ldap? if so contact infra for help, otherwise, you are refused on
> purpose.
>
> On Wed,
doesn't do anything that it's not supposed to). It looks to me
> that sometimes passing regression tests is seen as the change has been
> tested. IMO regression test passing is a prerequisite of a PR being ready
> for anyone other than the author(s) to start reviewing the PR.
>
LS,
I want to run an integration test (for LDAP but that is irrelevant) and
marvin does not cleanup resources
I isolated the problem like so:
```
#Import Local Modules
import marvin
from marvin.cloudstackTestCase import *
from marvin.cloudstackAPI import *
from marvin.lib.utils import *
from marvi
201 - 300 of 3867 matches
Mail list logo
