Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
It is now fwd merged to all the branches. Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
This is pushed to 4.8 but not merged fwd.
looks like 4.8 is not fwd merged for some commits and there are conflicts
now. Need to investigate further. Will continue on monday.
---
If your
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Iso failures are due to URL access issues. All good here. merging this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-88
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
@jburwell a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 116
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=103
Failed=2
Skipped=5
_Link to logs Folder
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
I started another test run on this. If it goes through, I will merge this
tonight.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
The commits have been squashed, commit message updated to make sense (I
think; let me know if it's not right), and rebased against latest 4.8.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
@ProjectMoon can you squash your changes, and rebase against latest base
branch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
No code changes, just updating the commits under it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Iso tests failed as the iso url wasnt accessible from our test environment.
All is well here.
@ProjectMoon were there any code changes in your latest rebase? (meaning,
do we have to run
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
This branch has been rebased to latest 4.8.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 112
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=101
Failed=2
Skipped=4
_Link to logs Folder
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 102
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=99
Failed=2
Skipped=4
_Link to logs Folder
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
I started BVT run(xenserver, advanced zone) on this PR. @cloudmonger will
post the results here in approx. 4 hrs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
@ProjectMoon I want to get this PR into 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, and 4.10.0.0 for
which we will be cutting RCs on 25 Sept 2016. Tests should be the entire
Marvin smoke test suite against VMware,
Github user nnesic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
@blueorangutan kick
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
We can have someone test it. Are you looking for results of a manual test,
reproduction tests, or something automated? A manual test is probably the best
from our side because we don't
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
@ProjectMoon we need a test LGTM. I inquired yesterday -- do you have
someone lined up to test it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Looks like it's ready for merging now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
The pull request has been rebased.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
@ProjectMoon please rebase now, PR 1654 has been merged now. DB upgrades
should not cause errors.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
LGTM. Thanks @ProjectMoon as soon as #1654 is merged, we'll get this merged
as well. Do we have any regression tests results, especially around the changed
code?
---
If your project is set up
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Alright. I'll rebase it once #1654 has been merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
LGTM for code review. Do we have someone testing for the second LGTM?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
@ProjectMoon we have a code review LGTM on #1654, and have someone lined up
to test it and provide the second LGTM. We should have the second LGTM by 1
Sept 2016 at which time you can re-kick
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Until #1654 is fixed and merged, all 4.8 will fail due to db upgrade
failures. /cc @jburwell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Have rebased to latest 4.8. Travis build failed with what looks like
`Unable to execute
/home/travis/build/apache/cloudstack/developer/target/db/templates.simulator.sql:
Unknown column
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Jenkins build log has vanished into 404 oblivion. Will see what happened
with Travis (https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/154436801).
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
@ProjectMoon both the Jenkins and Travis builds are failing. Could you
please investigate?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Has been rebased against latest 4.8 and the `TODO` comments removed. The
map was left alone though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
@ProjectMoon I would like to get this PR merged for the 4.8.2.0 release,
but I need to cut an RC ASAP. Will it be possible for you to address the PR
comments in time?
---
If your project is
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1624
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
A Trillian-Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages and start testing.
I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
@blueorangutan kick
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
36 matches
Mail list logo
