[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-09 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-218069657 @jayapalu I `did not` make any changes, I simply tested your PR. The NAT traversal is explicit in 4.x and in my environment your PR did not work for me for my clien

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-09 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-218066775 @rhtyd Did you configured 5.x ? I remember there is configuration difference compared to 4.5.x If there is no configuration difference for the 5.x then we can us

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-09 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-218065380 @jayapalu I created systemvm templates from your PR and used them: https://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/custom/strongswanvpn I would like to see two

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-09 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-218063912 @rhtyd Previously tested the template generated from this branch remote access vpn and s2s vpn worked., you can find the templates from the comments. I wil

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-06 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-217410505 @jayapalu I've tried the client only one by one, one at a time. To share my environment, I'm on a 192.168.0.0/16 network from where all my clients try to connect to th

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-06 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-217407342 @rhtyd Is single NAT client is not working for you ? Multiple clients at the same time from single NATed public ip will not work. Single nat client (w

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-05 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-217344487 @jayapalu I spent several hours testing this PR, my conclusion is that it cannot be used for production usage yet and need more tweaking; - We should consider

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-05 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-217343777 @rhtyd Except rebase nothing pending from my side. If you look at the my comments on Dec 29, 2015 I have already posted my test results. Please review and give

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-05 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r62286863 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/configure.py --- @@ -542,11 +552,11 @@ def configure_ipsec(self, obj): secret.comm

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-05 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-217129543 I testing this using these templates I built with changes from this PR on master: https://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/custom/strongswanvpn/ --- If your pr

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-05 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r62172409 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/configure.py --- @@ -542,11 +552,11 @@ def configure_ipsec(self, obj): secret.commit(

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-05 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r62172310 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/vpn/etc/ipsec.d/l2tp.conf --- @@ -30,4 +35,5 @@ conn L2TP-PSK # --

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-05 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-217118554 @jburwell @wido @agneya2001 @remibergsma @DaanHoogland @nvazquez @nlivens @resmo @swill and others -- please help review and test this --- If your project is set up f

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-05 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-217117011 @jayapalu I appreciate if you can resolve some of the outstanding issues, and testing efforts -- I hope to see this feature merged before the freeze date this month, i

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-05-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-216193434 @jayapalu please rebase against latest master and push -f, update on status of your PR. Please also squash merge your changes into a single commit. In general,

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-04-18 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-211539172 I would like to get on top of the PRs that have systemvm changes, because it looks like we will have to push new systemvms for the 4.9 release. We still have a bit of

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-04-17 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-211094168 @jayapalu The strongswan service is now started automatically on all systemvms (including console proxy and seconday storage vm). I think we should start it only

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-04-12 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-208922778 I would like to get the LGTM from @remibergsma and @pdion891 before I merge this. Thanks for all the hard work @jayapalu.. --- If your project is set up for it, you

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-04-12 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-208817879 @jayapalu Please talk to @swill before merge. I'll also have another look at it and see if I can get it to work this time. --- If your project is set up

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-04-12 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-208814933 @pdion891 I have rebased this branch with the master. Can you please trigger a template job on this branch. I don't have the permissions. I am planning to ask Bhara

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-04-11 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-208727264 @pdion891 I was worked for me when I connect remote access vpn from Macbook Air. Can you please send the vpn config file (l2tp.conf) --- If your pro

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-04-06 Thread pdion891
Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-206384893 I have an environment to test this PR which as been build from @jayapalu branch, the managment-server and the systemVM template from: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-03-23 Thread bhaisaab
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-200275604 @jayapalu unfortunately missed your message, can you fix any outstanding issues, squash the commits to a single commit, and rebase against latest master. I'll have

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-02-26 Thread pdion891
Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-189313548 On what CloudStack version did you test? and did you had a build using this PR? Because I haven't test from a build of this PR which might be a wrong test too

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-02-22 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-187544886 @pdion891 I did not see the issue you are facing. I have enabled the remote access vpn from the cloudstack UI. I can see xl2tpd running. I can also restart the x

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-02-17 Thread pdion891
Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-185506918 Hi John, Here is the l2tp configuration file, IP address voluntarily sabotage: ``` conn L2TP-PSK authby=secret pfs=no

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-02-16 Thread jlk
Github user jlk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-185027829 Any chance you can post /etc/ipsec.d/l2tp.conf, Pierre? I thought they would be compatible... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-02-16 Thread pdion891
Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-184990354 I've just tested systemVM template[1] using strongswan on 4.8.0. inside a VPC, the remote management VPN does not work, starting the service ipsec fail with followi

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-02-05 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-180292881 @remibergsma @bhaisaab I have seen observed the your cloud monkey tests, some thing wrong createvpnconnection steps. create-vpns.sh is not passing the 'pass

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-27 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-176011491 @jayapalu The test may pass, but my manual (scripted cloudmonkey) test doesn't so we need to figure out what goes wrong. See my comments above. --- If your proj

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-27 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-175488909 @remibergsma Can you please try running the below tests once and let me know. For me the tests are passed. $nosetests-2.7 --with-marvin --marvin-co

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-18 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-172485592 @remibergsma conflict got resolved. I have tried running this test. There were some test setup issue while I am running I resolved those in my local. The test go

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-16 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-172254915 @jayapalu That didn't help unfortunately. Also, there is now a conflict. Can you resolve it please? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-16 Thread wilderrodrigues
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r49930246 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/configure.py --- @@ -479,13 +479,13 @@ def process(self): def deletevpn(self,

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-11 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-170782564 @remibergsma status get updated in 'router.check.interval'. Please set that interval to low 30 sec to update the status immediately and try running once. --- If yo

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-10 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-170361427 @jayapalu Repeated the test, same result. The first connections gets in Error state. It does actually connect, even without "reset VPN connection" but it seems n

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-10 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-170360605 What could have caused the "error" is that it actually timed out. The script that was suppose to start the connection was hanging: ``` root 3237

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-10 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-170360426 When I do a "reset vpn connection" it worked. Hmm.. will destroy everything and try again. Want to see a few times that this works without errors. --- If your p

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-10 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-170359977 The weird thing is that it is in error state, but it seems to work: ``` root@r-3-VM:~# /opt/cloud/bin/checks2svpn.sh 192.168.23.54 ISAKMP SA found

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-10 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-170359050 Systemvm template seems right. ![screen shot 2016-01-10 at 16 17 32](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1630096/1209/bfd4bc64-b7b5-11e5-9690-bd170

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-10 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-170352243 @jayapalu Unfortunately it didn't work for me. ``` Error 534, Resource [Site2SiteVpnConnection:1] is unreachable: Failed to apply site-to-site VPN

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-06 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-169546574 @remibergsma Did you find some time to test this ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. I

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-05 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-168948254 @terbolous Thanks for testing it. @resmo Did you find time to test this feature ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-05 Thread terbolous
Github user terbolous commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r48824088 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/configure.py --- @@ -479,13 +479,13 @@ def process(self): def deletevpn(self, ip):

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-04 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r48810627 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/configure.py --- @@ -479,13 +479,13 @@ def process(self): def deletevpn(self, ip):

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-01-04 Thread terbolous
Github user terbolous commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r48774570 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/configure.py --- @@ -479,13 +479,13 @@ def process(self): def deletevpn(self, ip):

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-31 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-168246377 Great that the tests pass now! We need to be careful and test it thoroughly. I will hopefully be able to test it soon and try to finish it before the 4.8 freeze.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-31 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-168152239 @bhaisaab I am waiting for the LGTM. Can u please review the changes and give LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-30 Thread bhaisaab
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-168075694 @jayapalu thanks for the work, now let's get it in master before the 4.8 freeze. @remibergsma we'll have to get a new systemvmtemplate and add upgrade paths if this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-29 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-167932695 @remibergsma @kishankavala @terbolous @bhaisaab Added all the required tests below. Please review the PR. nosetests-2.7 --with-marvin --marvin-config=/

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-29 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-167769469 Site to site vpn test case results: $nosetests-2.7 --with-marvin --marvin-config=/Users/jayapalreddy/advanced-acs.cfg /Users/jayapalreddy/dev/ccp/internal-clou

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-21 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-166530238 @remibergsma I have tried running the tests site to site vpn test cases on this. I getting the test case issues. Remi can you please run the tests on this i

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-13 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-164340450 @remibergsma This job is success now. I am downloading the template from this. http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-github/ --- If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-10 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r47320168 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/vpn/etc/ipsec.d/l2tp.conf --- @@ -30,4 +35,5 @@ conn L2TP-PSK # ---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-09 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-163343854 @pdion891 Is the systemvmbuilder one of the boxes you manage? Is there another way to build systemvm templates via Jenkins that currently works? --- If your pro

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-09 Thread pdion891
Github user pdion891 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r47089553 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/vpn/etc/ipsec.d/l2tp.conf --- @@ -30,4 +35,5 @@ conn L2TP-PSK # ---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-08 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r47049123 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/vpn/etc/ipsec.d/l2tp.conf --- @@ -30,4 +35,5 @@ conn L2TP-PSK # ---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-08 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r46961653 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/vpn/etc/ipsec.d/l2tp.conf --- @@ -30,4 +35,5 @@ conn L2TP-PSK #

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-08 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162825327 @jayapalu Can you share the right systemvm template somewhere? Otherwise I cannot test this. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-08 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162812927 @remibergsma It seems the systemvmvbuilder machine is down. He is having access to these machines ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-07 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162803159 @jayapalu Hmmm the job is not starting? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-07 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162789887 @terbolous Remote access vpn i have tested It. I have triggered a job for systemvm template on my github branch for strongswan changes. http://jenkins.build

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-07 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162788704 Thanks @jayapalu @terbolous can you test remote access vpn please? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your repl

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-07 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162761653 @remibergsma @bhaisaab I am working on uploading the test case results for the site2site vpn. Meanwhile some one can pick up this branch and generate the syste

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-07 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162668836 @jayapalu Unfortunately I got no response and I cannot merge it without knowing if it is even finished. Please send an update asap and if it is finished

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-07 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162526429 @jayapalu Nice! Did you also test site2site VPN? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-07 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162517321 Remote access vpn test results: nosetests-2.7 --with-marvin --marvin-config=/Users/jayapalreddy/advanced.cfg /Users/jayapalreddy/dev/github/cloudstack/test/

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-07 Thread bhaisaab
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162469649 @jayapalu looks like you're still working on this, making progress. Please ping us when you want us to start some testing today (hopefully before EOD 12PM/CET). Ple

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-07 Thread terbolous
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162467255 @DaanHoogland: yes, we're unable to use 4.6 due to the bug mentioned. now, the original issue may be fixed in 4.6 with openswan later, but i would much rather see

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-07 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162466433 @terbolous @DaanHoogland This seems like a bug fix, but since it needs a new systemvm template there is no way we will add this to 4.6. For the same reason, I wa

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-07 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162466163 @jayapalu I see some new commits. Did you change anything yet? Should we start testing? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-07 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162464916 @terbolous your real question is: Can we get this in 4.6/4.7? right? I sugest you start a discuss thread on dev@ if you feel it should. --- If your project is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-06 Thread terbolous
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162437862 @jayapalu that would be great, but due note that feature freeze is today. @remibergsma @DaanHoogland: is this really a new feature, rather an improvement, no?

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-06 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162411259 @terbolous I will take care of this issue in strongswan implementation. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-05 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r46761289 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/vpn/etc/ipsec.d/l2tp.conf --- @@ -30,4 +33,6 @@ conn L2TP-PSK #

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-04 Thread terbolous
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162106175 @jayapalu i believe that is broken in 4.6 already, atleast i filed an issue for it with the current openswan implementation at https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-04 Thread bhaisaab
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162040698 @jayapalu thank for the update, unfortunately I couldn't find time to work on it but good to see you're working on it. I'm not sure about the restarts, but on VPC r

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-04 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-161940413 @bhaisaab @remibergsma Started merging these commits into the latest master/4.6. Hopefully Monday it will be ready. @bhaisaab In strongswan ipsec observed

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-02 Thread bhaisaab
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-161222526 @remibergsma no promises but I'll try to meet that made up deadline :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-01 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-161191190 @bhaisaab time is running out, if we want this in 4.7 (and that would be great!) we need to merge on Dec 7 the latest. Can you give this a spin and see if you ca

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-12-01 Thread bhaisaab
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-160909435 We really need this for 4.7, the VPN feature is practically flaky for users @jayapalu any updates on this, if you're not able to work on this. I can help test/fi

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-11-27 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-160189412 @jayapalu OK, no problem. FYI, we freeze on Dec 7. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-11-22 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-158854951 @remibergsma GIve me some time I will take care of it for 4.7 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on G

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-11-17 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-157313386 @jayapalu @karuturi Let's get this into 4.7! Can you respond to the comments please @jayapalu ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-10-29 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-152137705 @terbolous To get started, we need people actually testing / reviewing this and there also are some unaddressed comments. Testing this requires building the syst

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-10-29 Thread terbolous
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-152123825 Any update here @jayapalu? @remibergsma @karuturi what is the chance for this getting into 4.6? replacing the old openswan would be good.. --- If your project is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-10-11 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-147289439 @pdion891 @remibergsma we already have a jenkins systemvm build which takes git branch as parameter. http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/parame

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-10-10 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-147117406 @pdion891 Thanks! Build succeeded :-) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-10-10 Thread pdion891
Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-147113348 The jenkins job is created: build-systemvm64-GithubPullRequest and is currently building this branch as tests. will see the result of the job#1 ... --- If your pr

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-10-10 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-147112657 @jayapalu Please rebase against current master, as in this branch the default route is broken so it doesn't work. Also, there's an open question on 'rightsubnetw

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-10-10 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-147112559 It's not only remote access VPN, also site-to-site VPN. When testing, one need to build a cloud with a systemvm template generated from this branch. Curr

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-10-10 Thread bhaisaab
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-147090386 LGTM, let's merge this once tested with both Windows and OSX clients. Thanks @jayapalu for the fix. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-09-30 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-144499793 @jayapalu Before you run the tests, please rebase as you'll otherwise find many false-positives. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-09-29 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-144292905 @jayapalu Thanks! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-09-29 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-144036889 I will file a ticket for the rightsubnetwithin configuration. I will run the BVT tests and update the results here. --- If your project is set up for it, you ca

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-09-27 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-143589309 @bhaisaab Yes we can consider including it. After rebasing this PR we can run the BVT tests against it to see if there are any issues. We need to be careful thou

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-09-27 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-143589238 @jayapalu Can you please rebase against current master? Did you run the BVT tests against this branch? If so, please post output. I'd recommend doing tha

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-09-24 Thread bhaisaab
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-142919266 @remibergsma @karuturi VPN is sort of broken for 4.5 and below, should we include this in 4.6 if this passes tests and review? --- If your project is set up for it

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-09-22 Thread pdion891
Github user pdion891 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r40155285 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/vpn/etc/ipsec.d/l2tp.conf --- @@ -30,4 +33,6 @@ conn L2TP-PSK # ---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

2015-09-22 Thread terbolous
Github user terbolous commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r40074130 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/vpn/etc/ipsec.d/l2tp.conf --- @@ -30,4 +33,6 @@ conn L2TP-PSK # --

  1   2   >