Thank you for all the support everyone. This vote is now closed. We have
unanimous support for this proposal with the following votes:
Totals
--
+1: 20 (including myself)
+0: 0
-1: 0
I have opened a support ticket with github to get a clearer understanding
of what the process will be to
+1
Den fredag 18. mars 2016 skrev Will Stevens
følgende:
> We are discussing this proposal in 3 or 4 threads, so I will not try to
> recap everything. Instead I will try to give a brief overview of the
> problem and a proposal for solving it.
>
> *Problem:*
> The
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@accelerite.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 11:57 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' ->
> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'
> >
> &
hu <suresh.sa...@accelerite.com> wrote:
>
> +1.
>
> Regards
> Sadhu
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@accelerite.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 11:57 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move '
+1.
Regards
Sadhu
-Original Message-
From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@accelerite.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 11:57 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'
+1
--Bharat
On 21 Mar 2016 11:51 am, Kis
Makes sense Shane if we can have that role shared amongst several people of
the PMC, not just one as you suggest.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Will Stevens wrote earlier:
> ... snip...
> > *Proposal:*
> > Transfer ownership of the
hunfeng tian [mailto:tianyunqu...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 March 2016 05:22 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'
+1
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa
+1 for the move.
Regards,
Kishan Kavala
Chief Product Engineer,
CloudPlatform Development, Accelerite.
www.accelerite.com
-Original Message-
From: chunfeng tian [mailto:tianyunqu...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 March 2016 05:22 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache
Will Stevens wrote earlier:
... snip...
> *Proposal:*
> Transfer ownership of the 'apache/cloudstack' mirrored repository out of
> the 'apache' github organization into the 'apache-cloudstack' github
> organization (which I have already setup and started inviting users to).
> Both members of the
+1
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> +1..
>
> ++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Chief Architect
> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> NASA Jet
+1..
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:
+1
Good plan
-Original Message-
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@accelerite.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2016 7:03 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'
+1
I'd second that. Move to apa
+1
Note:
———
To be honest I never contemplated this move. Somehow it never occurred to me as
a possibility.
But if the board and infra would let use move the mirror of the apache
canonical repo to apache-cloudstack/cloudstack
then I think we would be all set.
> On Mar 19, 2016, at 5:14 PM,
+1
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> +1 (binding as I saw others mention that. I doubt this is of any concern in
> such a technical decision)
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Stevens
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for
+1 (binding as I saw others mention that. I doubt this is of any concern in
such a technical decision)
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Stevens
wrote:
> Thank you for this information, this is very helpful.
> On Mar 19, 2016 5:29 AM, "Rene Moser"
Thank you for this information, this is very helpful.
On Mar 19, 2016 5:29 AM, "Rene Moser" wrote:
> On 03/18/2016 11:44 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
>
> > *Proposal:*
> > Transfer ownership of the 'apache/cloudstack' mirrored repository out of
> > the 'apache' github organization
+1 (binding)
> Op 18 mrt. 2016 om 23:44 heeft Will Stevens het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> We are discussing this proposal in 3 or 4 threads, so I will not try to
> recap everything. Instead I will try to give a brief overview of the
> problem and a proposal for
+1 (binding)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Will Stevens"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 18 March, 2016 22:44:45
> Subject: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' ->
On 03/18/2016 11:44 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> *Proposal:*
> Transfer ownership of the 'apache/cloudstack' mirrored repository out of
> the 'apache' github organization into the 'apache-cloudstack' github
> organization (which I have already setup and started inviting users to).
> Both members of
+1 for the move to apache-cloudstack/cloudstack
From: Will Stevens
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2016 4:14 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'
We are discussing
, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2016 9:05 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-
> cloudstack/cloudstack'
>
> +1
>
> From: ilya <ilya.mai
+1
From: ilya <ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 9:23 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'
+1 Binding.
I dont see anything wrong with this
+1
Simon Weller/ENA
(615) 312-6068
-Original Message-
From: Will Stevens [williamstev...@gmail.com]
Received: Friday, 18 Mar 2016, 5:45PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org [dev@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'
We are
+1 Binding.
I dont see anything wrong with this approach especially if it helps to
solve our backlog issue.
On 3/18/16 3:44 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> We are discussing this proposal in 3 or 4 threads, so I will not try to
> recap everything. Instead I will try to give a brief overview of the
>
24 matches
Mail list logo