storage failure domains on a cluster basis.
Simon Weller/ENA
(615) 312-6068
-Original Message-
From: Will Stevens [wstev...@cloudops.com]
Received: Friday, 09 Sep 2016, 5:46PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org [dev@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: Re: storage
y not just use different primary storage per cluster. You then can
>>> control your storage failure domains on a cluster basis.
>>>
>>> Simon Weller/ENA
>>> (615) 312-6068
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Will Stevens [wstev...
your storage failure domains on a cluster basis.
>>
>> Simon Weller/ENA
>> (615) 312-6068
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Will Stevens [wstev...@cloudops.com]
>> Received: Friday, 09 Sep 2016, 5:46PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org [dev@clo
> From: Will Stevens [wstev...@cloudops.com]
> Received: Friday, 09 Sep 2016, 5:46PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org [dev@cloudstack.apache.org]
> Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
>
> I have not really thought through this use case, but off the top of my
> head, you MAY be
[dev@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
I have not really thought through this use case, but off the top of my
head, you MAY be able to do something like use host anti-affinity and then
use different primary storage per host affinity. I know this is not the
ideal solution
_
> From: williamstev...@gmail.com <williamstev...@gmail.com> on behalf
> of Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 12:44 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
il.com> on behalf of
Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 12:44 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
My understanding is that he wants to do anti-affinity across primary
storage endpoin
ember 9, 2016 12:44 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
My understanding is that he wants to do anti-affinity across primary
storage endpoints. So if he has two web servers, it would ensure that one
of his web servers is on Primary1 and the
9, 2016 12:44 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
My understanding is that he wants to do anti-affinity across primary
storage endpoints. So if he has two web servers, it would ensure that one
of his web servers is on Primary1 and the other
behalf of Will
Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 12:44 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
My understanding is that he wants to do anti-affinity across primary
storage endpoints. So if he has two web servers, it would ensure that one
of his
.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 11:08 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
>
> I am not a Java developer, so I am at a total loss on Mike’s approach. How
> would end users choose this new storage pool allocator from UI when
> pro
s offline, then it probably means your entire
datacenter is offline (ex. power loss of some sort).
Talk to you later,
Mike
From: Yiping Zhang <yzh...@marketo.com>
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 11:08 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage aff
___
From: Marty Godsey <ma...@gonsource.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 6:27 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: storage affinity groups
So what would be the best way to do it? I use templates to make it simple
for my users so that the Xen tools
.
From: Marty Godsey <ma...@gonsource.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 6:27 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: storage affinity groups
So what would be the best way to do it? I use templates to make it simple for
my users so that the Xen tools are already installed as an e
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
Well, using tags leads to proliferation of templates or service offerings etc.
It is not very scalable and gets out of hand very quickly.
Yiping
On 9/8/16, 4:25 PM, "Marty Godsey" <ma...@gonsource.com> wrote:
I
ow...@netapp.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 7:16 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
If one doesn't already exist, you can write a custom storage allocator to
handle this scenario.
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Yiping Zhang
-
From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 7:16 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: storage affinity groups
If one doesn't already exist, you can write a custom storage allocator to
handle this scenario.
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 4:25
If one doesn't already exist, you can write a custom storage allocator to
handle this scenario.
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Yiping Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi, Devs:
>
> We all know how (anti)-host affinity group works in CloudStack, I am
> wondering if there is a similar
18 matches
Mail list logo