On 09/26/2013 01:38 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
Is there any technical reason why we couldn't use ubuntu LTS (12.04
and soon to be 14.04) for the system VM. Additionally is there any
technical reason we couldn't switch to 64bit. I don't necesarily want
to get into fight for you favorite
Yes. 4.2 has Wheezy with the 3.2 kernel. Theoretically with RPS/RFS we
could use multiple cores effectively, but it may be harder in practice.
On 9/25/13 10:53 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, for sure 32bit PV is faster. Do we require a specific minimum
kernel
That enabled running without a system vm. But you'd still need a VR if you
wanted network services.
On 9/26/13 12:47 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 26, 2013, at 3:27 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 09/26/2013 01:38 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
Is
Is there any technical reason why we couldn't use ubuntu LTS (12.04
and soon to be 14.04) for the system VM. Additionally is there any
technical reason we couldn't switch to 64bit. I don't necesarily want
to get into fight for you favorite distro discussion, just curious.
Darren
32-bit theoretically performs better on Xen.
Debian is just more stable than Ubuntu, hence the preference.
On 9/25/13 4:38 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any technical reason why we couldn't use ubuntu LTS (12.04
and soon to be 14.04) for the system VM.
Yeah, for sure 32bit PV is faster. Do we require a specific minimum kernel
version? I though I heard something about upgrading the template for multicore
networking or something like that.
Darren
On Sep 25, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
wrote:
32-bit
