Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
@karuturi why do we need an explicit JIRA ID, I would copy the same things
as on this PR. It duplicates effort on my end with no benefits. When you a
merge a PR, it contains the history and ID of
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
I just realised that I started bulding centos7 pacakges on 4.7 which is not
supported now. Do you want this in 4.7 given that we dont do anymore releases
on it?
---
If your project is set
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
I can see the following packages after a successful build on 4.7
cloudstack-agent-4.7.2-SNAPSHOT.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
cloudstack-baremetal-agent-4.7.2-SNAPSHOT.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
@karuturi thanks, I understand now. You're right, I sent for 4.7 as we
support fwd-merging since 4.7 and we might need to test a 4.7 based security
release in future.
---
If your project is set
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/29
corrected the list of rpms
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/karuturi/cloudstack-docs-install patch-4
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
I meant 4.7 is not a supported release by the community and there wont be
any more releases from it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@ProjectMoon can you push -f or close+open this PR to re-kick Travis?
@jburwell Travis was failing on master due to a missing db path, a fix was
merged yesterday. All PRs with failing
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/351
@anshul1886 can you rebase against latest master and push -f ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
@karuturi I don't understand your comment, centos7 packages have been
supported since 4.6 (actually 4.5 too ships a centos7 repository). The PR is
for 4.7 as it would fix and improve testing for
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
@karuturi it would be difficult to create and send PRs for every bug. I
understand that it makes things easier, and I'll update the JIRA ID. That said,
please understand that while I try to be
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
@karuturi done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
@karuturi done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/28
corrected -d value while building rpm packages
Its listed as centos6 while its centos63.
Also added the help section for other available options
You can merge this pull request
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
1. github is readonly and its difficult for me to track anything here. I
would not need if we had github issues and all the flexibility.
2. release notes etc. can be generated. In case
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
LGTM on code review and tested the systemvm build on OSX.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
After we move to the new template for readthedocs, "fork on github" button
is lost. It was very useful for quick corrections.
Anyone knows how to bring it back?
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626#discussion_r73648560
--- Diff: tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/definition.rb ---
@@ -27,15 +27,15 @@
architectures = {
:i386 => {
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/540
@jburwell Likitha has moved on, unlikely we'll hear from her or see further
development activity
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
I see the following successfully built packages on 4.8
cloudstack-agent-4.8.1-SNAPSHOT.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
cloudstack-baremetal-agent-4.8.1-SNAPSHOT.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1620
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1620
oobm: simply change password transactional logic
- Simplifies change password transactional logic without using pessmistic
locks
- Adds a re-enter password field in the UI to valid
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1621
The changes won't be tested by Trillian as it does not support upgrade
tests yet. Based on the packaging result, we can accept it if anyone has
performed an upgrade test manually. /cc @karuturi
CLOUDSTACK-9437 has been fixed and applied on 4.9+. This can be closed.
CLOUDSTACK-9420 needs a checking against latest 4.9.0 release or master.
We also have a build blocker which is around systemvm template building: (not
exactly a road-block but would be great to get it merged)
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1627
Merge 4.9 to master
Initial merge of 4.9 to master
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/karuturi/cloudstack merge-49-to-master
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1628
updated contributing.md
As this is the doc that is showed while creating a pull request, updated it
with information from release principles wiki.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
Alright, your PR did not break packaging! Packages built and available at:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/custom/github-1615
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1621
Alright, your PR did not break packaging! Packages built and available at:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/custom/github-1621
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
Thank you @karuturi
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607
SSVM downloader now handles redirects properly.
Previously it was using the HttpClient to make an initial request to an
ISO. This would follow redirects. Then it would make another
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Will check the smoke tests for Marvin.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
This is merged to all the branches
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/2875af71126cbfb6ebd0d47c2d593ff6d9c61c20
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
We have the following list of blockers currently open.
CLOUDSTACK-9437: Outbound traffic fails to work after VR is upgraded to
post 4.6+ release
CLOUDSTACK-9420: Process encryption hangs
CLOUDSTACK-9408: remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com
If you have some time, please take a
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1627
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
Thanks @karuturi
I'm not sure why the PR did not close, closing it manually now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
@rhtyd I couldn't find either. Let me know if you see any issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1620
Failed to build one or more CloudStack packages that would have been
available at: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/custom/github-1620
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623
JIRA ticket is CLOUDSTACK-9317. Have not run the Marvin tests, but will do
so.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623#discussion_r73664374
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/IpAddressManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1698,6 +1698,22 @@ public String acquireGuestIpAddress(Network network,
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
@karuturi can we merge this as well, this is the last of build blockers.
I'm currently increasing Jenkins slave capacity so @blueorangutan can kick
packaging and eventually start testing against
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602
@rhtyd can you re-kick this PR for @blueorangutan?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Bump...
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Will Stevens
wrote:
> Link didn't get auto-created correctly, so here it is again for everyone
> who is using something like gmail as a client:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=s
>
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@ProjectMoon Travis is now passing, but Jenkins failed. Could you please
investigate the failure and fix it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1619
Nevermind @blueorangutan centos7 packaging worked, debian builder had an
issue so it failed. I've fixed them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607
SSVM downloader now handles redirects properly.
Previously it was using the HttpClient to make an initial request to an
ISO. This would follow redirects. Then it would make another
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1621
@jburwell I can do it late next week, pretty stacked up currently.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1621
@borisstoyanov do you have the bandwidth to manually test upgrading 4.8 to
4.9 using this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1621
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1621
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1619
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1619
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1602
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599
Marvin: Fix codegenerator to work with API discovery
This fixes Marvin cloudstackAPI generator to work with a live running mgmt
server's api discovery.
You can merge this pull request into a
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1611
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1611
marvin: deploy clusters in separate threads
This speeds up cluster deployment by Marvin, each cluster deployment can be
executed in separate threads. This for example, allows for setting up
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1619
Packaging result: âcentos7 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1619
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1607
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1620
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1620
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1606
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1606
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1600
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1606
LGTM (did not test it, kicked a packaging build)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607
Nevermind @blueorangutan the jenkins job died due to git/github related
errors:
error: index-pack died of signal 15
fatal: index-pack failed
I'll kick it again
---
If your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1622
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602#discussion_r73744970
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
---
@@ -537,15 +540,51 @@ public Answer
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Will check it out on Monday. Very weird that the end of the build is not an
error specifically. Just "ending due to build failure" or some such.
The first exception I see is:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1622
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Hello,
I have this error when I try to build the debian packages (on ubuntu 14.04)
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @
cloudstack-framework ---
[INFO] Building jar:
/root/CS/cloudstack-dev/tools/checkstyle/target/checkstyle-4.8.1.jar
[...]
[ERROR] Failed to
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1619
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1619
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1600
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
We're running this in production with a few back ported patches from 4.9.
Environment:
3 Management servers load balanced
KVM hosts
Ceph primary storage with multiple Ceph pods tied to different ACS clusters.
Advanced networking with VPCs.
+1
From: Will
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602#discussion_r73742107
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/VolumeOrchestrator.java
---
@@ -1353,6 +1363,20 @@ public void
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
testing - ignore me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602#discussion_r73742358
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/VolumeOrchestrator.java
---
@@ -1353,6 +1363,20 @@ public void
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602#discussion_r73744705
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
---
@@ -537,15 +540,51 @@ public Answer
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602#discussion_r73745286
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/storage/resource/VmwareStorageSubsystemCommandHandler.java
---
@@ -66,19 +68,28 @@ public
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
@blueorangutan kickpkgs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
@blueorangutan showprogress
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
@blueorangutan echo
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1620
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1620
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602
I rebased master branch and pushed again, could it be ran again?
@blueorangutan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Hi,
I'm trying to use the CS 4.5.2 Load Balancer in https mode (SSL Termination
done on the LB) but I'm unable to upload the certificates.
I follow the instructions on this wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSL+Termination+Support#SSLTerminationSupport-Introduction
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
@blueorangutan hello
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602#discussion_r73753271
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/VolumeOrchestrator.java
---
@@ -1353,6 +1363,20 @@ public void
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
@blueorangutan help
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1602
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1606
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1606
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
@rhtyd I understand these comments: "help", "hello", "thanks", "kick",
"results?"
Authorized contributors for kicking Trillian Jenkins job are: ['rhtyd',
'jburwell']
---
If your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
hello @rhtyd
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1607
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602#discussion_r73753387
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
---
@@ -537,15 +540,51 @@ public Answer
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602#discussion_r73753345
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
---
@@ -537,15 +540,51 @@ public Answer
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1541
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1541
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
you're welcome @rhtyd
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
@blueorangutan thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
@blueorangutan kick
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1626
A Trillian-Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages and start testing.
I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615#discussion_r73765448
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -520,6 +528,16 @@ public String updateConfiguration(final long
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615#discussion_r73765615
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/ImageStoreDetailsUtil.java ---
@@ -20,48 +20,68 @@
import javax.inject.Inject;
+import
I've been thinking that it could be easier to adapt existing Nicira NVP
Plugin than creating a new one. A possible approach could be this one:
Add a parameter to addNiciraNvpDeviceCmd, say isnsxtransformers, that could
work like this:
- if it is false (or null): actual nicira nvp device will be
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo