Something like Liquibase would be nice. Hibernate might be even better.
Even idempotent migrations would be a step in the right direction. Perhaps
reject any migration changes that aren't INSERT IGNORE, DROP IF EXISTS, etc?
I'm not sure why the DAO was originally hand-rolled. Perhaps the original
Github user nitin-maharana commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771#discussion_r102173991
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java ---
@@ -3085,9 +3085,10 @@ public GuestVlan
Github user HrWiggles commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102187534
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java ---
@@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO vm)
{
Github user HrWiggles commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102177792
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java ---
@@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO vm)
{
Github user HrWiggles commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102181285
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java ---
@@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO vm)
{
Github user HrWiggles commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102179249
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java ---
@@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO vm)
{
Github user HrWiggles commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102178630
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java ---
@@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO vm)
{
Github user HrWiggles commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102184780
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java ---
@@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO vm)
{
Good strategy and I would make that not a warning but a fatal, as the
resulting ACS version will probably not work.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Then you have to create your own branch forked from 4.10.0
>
> In our branch, I moved some table changes
Sure Daan. I'll publish the design on cwiki and share the link.
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 7:27 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [PROPOSAL] add native vm-cluster orchestration service (was:
See inline.
Thanks,
Koushik
On 21/02/17, 11:47 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
Hi Koushik,
Thanks for sharing your comments and questions.
1. Yes, the FS is divided into two parts - a general HA framework which makes
no assumption about the type
Github user ramkatru commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1897
@sureshanaparti, please look into these failures.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1881
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Marc-Aurele, you are totally right and people agree with you but no one seems
to give this priority
daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Utrecht Utrecht 3531 VENetherlands
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Marc-Aurèle Brothier
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/859
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 369
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=104
Failed=1
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1824#discussion_r102192868
--- Diff: scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vmops ---
@@ -232,28 +233,50 @@ def deleteFile(session, args):
return txt
+#using
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1861
@borisstoyanov, thanks for running tets.
I see 1 test error in the above results, this test has been failing in many
other PRs as well, and doesn't seem related to changes
IMO the database changes should be idempotent as much as possible with
"CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW..." "DROP IF EXISTS". For other things like
altering a table, it's more complicated to achieve that in pure SQL.
A good call would be to integrate http://www.liquibase.org/ to manage the
schema and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1882
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/859
@kishankavala i forgot about this one, guess we won't make 4.7 ;)
can you appease cloudmonger?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10895969/can-newer-jre-versions-run-java-programs-compiled-with-older-jdk-versions
You can run code compiled by the java 1.7 or 1.6 or earlier SDKs on a
Java 8 JVM.
This gets you the improved speed of the Java 8 JVM even if you do not
rebuild the code.
If
Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1768
@rhtyd Changing the sequence is only idempotent if you have been upgrading
to each new versions step by step. If you jumped other versions, then the path
is different for each original
Github user dmabry commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955
We are deploying this to our QA environment right now and hope to have it
tested in a few days. Great work @kiwiflyer and @nathanejohnson.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user Ashadeepa commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1957#discussion_r10411
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/vpn/RemoteAccessVpnManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -621,6 +627,10 @@ public void
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878#discussion_r102226833
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
---
@@ -2071,6 +2120,14 @@ protected
Github user ustcweizhou commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1957#discussion_r102209429
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/vpn/RemoteAccessVpnManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -621,6 +627,10 @@ public void
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1773
@priyankparihar I agree with @ustcweizhou regarding the default value of
`forced` in terms of backwards compatibility.
Also, why we permit deletion of a template when it is associated
GitHub user Ashadeepa opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1957
CLOUDSTACK-9748:VPN Users search functionality broken
VPN Users search functionality broken
If you try to search VPN users with itâs user name, you will not be able
to search.
Github user Ashadeepa commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1910
@ustcweizhou : Thanks. I have made the changes.
New PR : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1957.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Is there any chance we can fix the 'roles' issue with the API doc so we can
get the docs split into the 'Admin', 'Domain Admin' and 'User' again? The
introduction of the dynamic roles broke the generation of the API docs with
the different roles and I was not able to figure out how to fix it.
I'm also in favor of Liquibase.
Hibernate might be smart enough to add new columns,
but to be able to for example change the type of a column,
more complex data migration might be necessary.
Liquibase preconditions, combined with good identifiers
make up that upgrades will be more granular.
On 18 February 2017 at 20:51:42, Suresh Anaparti (
suresh.anapa...@accelerite.com) wrote:
I checked the limits set for VMware hypervisor and observed some
discrepancies. These can be either updated from the
updateHypervisorCapabilities API (max_data_volumes_limit,
max_hosts_per_cluster after
Github user dmabry commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1915
@serbaut I agree with @ustcweizhou. Please remove delaycompress and up to
10. I'd like to get this PR in as it is the second part of the problem
resolution for my issue. After that LGTM.
Actually, minor correction. When adding to VM/templates the name of the detail
is rootDiskController for Root controller and dataDiskController for additional
disks.
Also, if you want to make changes on a global scale the changes need to go to
vm_template_details and user_vm_details tables
Sergey Levitskiy wrote:
> Here it is the logic.
> 1. Default value is taken from a global configuration
> vmware.root.disk.controller
> 2. To override add the same config to template or VM (starting from 4.10
> UI allows adding advanced settings to templates
Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>> Op 25 januari 2017 om 4:44 schreef Simon Weller :
>>
>>
>> Maybe this is a good opportunity to discuss modernizing the OS
>> selections so that drivers (and other features) could be selectable per
>> OS.
>
> That seems like a
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
There are not failed test cases on CI run.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Sergey Levitskiy wrote:
> On vmware rootdiskcontroller is passed over to the hypervisor in VM start
> command. I know for the fact that the following rootdiskcontroller option
> specified in template/vm details work fine:
> ide
> scsi
> lsilogic
> lsilogic1068
Here it is the logic.
1. Default value is taken from a global configuration
vmware.root.disk.controller
2. To override add the same config to template or VM (starting from 4.10 UI
allows adding advanced settings to templates and/or VMs). If added to a
template all VMs deployed from it
Sergey Levitskiy wrote:
> Actually, minor correction. When adding to VM/templates the name of the
> detail is rootDiskController for Root controller and dataDiskController
> for additional disks.
> Also, if you want to make changes on a global scale the changes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953
Trillian test result (tid-877)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 26001 seconds
Marvin logs:
On vmware rootdiskcontroller is passed over to the hypervisor in VM start
command. I know for the fact that the following rootdiskcontroller option
specified in template/vm details work fine:
ide
scsi
lsilogic
lsilogic1068
In general, any scsi controller option that vmware recognizes should
Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1768
@serg38 Not sure to understand what you mean with:
> If I get it right with your proposed changes, upgrade scripts become
obsolete since all the changes can be done in upgrade scripts.
GitHub user Ashadeepa opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1959
CLOUDSTACK-9786:API reference guide entry for associateIpAddress needs
additional information
Going through the code & implementation, it seems like either of the
parameters are not
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1957
tested. LGTM
btw, you can use "git push --force" to overwrite the code
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Will, any specific use-case? For a live running cloudstack an apidocs plugin
could also be written that displays apidocs for a role/user-account consuming
from listApis.
Regards.
From: williamstev...@gmail.com on behalf of Will
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935
@rafaelweingartner I think I got your point, I tried to keep code as
similar as it was before, by declaring `rollBackState` as static class variable
on line 114. This way inner `finally` block
Github user Ashadeepa closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1910
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user Ashadeepa commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1957
@rafaelweingartner : This is due to the change in my remote urls. Closing
the old PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/1910.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935
Trillian test result (tid-876)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 35807 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1768
I'll try to make my point clearer with a better use case. Let say you were
running version ACS 4.4.2 and wish to upgrade to 4.7.1. After installing the
4.7.1, when ACS starts for the first
Github user sureshanaparti commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102301645
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java ---
@@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO vm)
Github user serbaut commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1915
Is it safe to remove delaycompress across the board, I assume it is there
for a reason?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user serbaut commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1915
Ok. I removed it from rsyslog since it should be safe there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-520
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1773
Trillian test result (tid-875)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 27492 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user nathanejohnson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956#discussion_r102309146
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -744,14 +744,17 @@ protected boolean checkWorkItems(final
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956#discussion_r102309517
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -744,14 +744,17 @@ protected boolean
Github user nathanejohnson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956#discussion_r102310032
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -744,14 +744,17 @@ protected boolean checkWorkItems(final
Github user sureshanaparti commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102309898
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java ---
@@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO vm)
Github user nathanejohnson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956#discussion_r102305779
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -744,14 +744,17 @@ protected boolean checkWorkItems(final
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956#discussion_r102308166
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -744,14 +744,17 @@ protected boolean
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1879
Trillian test result (tid-869)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 46839 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user sureshanaparti commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953
@remibergsma @borisstoyanov Updated the KVM code to generate the valid
device name above id 25.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user sureshanaparti commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102311697
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtVMDef.java
---
@@ -716,11 +734,6 @@ public DiskFmtType
Github user sureshanaparti commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953
@borisstoyanov Can you kick off Jenkins job on this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956#discussion_r102310842
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -744,14 +744,17 @@ protected boolean
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1875
Trillian test result (tid-867)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 48400 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935#discussion_r102265150
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/user/DomainManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -273,79 +274,97 @@ public boolean deleteDomain(long domainId, Boolean
cleanup) {
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935#discussion_r102265306
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/user/DomainManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -273,79 +274,97 @@ public boolean deleteDomain(long domainId, Boolean
cleanup) {
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935#discussion_r102264841
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/user/DomainManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -273,79 +274,97 @@ public boolean deleteDomain(long domainId, Boolean
cleanup) {
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878
Trillian test result (tid-873)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 33766 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user remibergsma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878
@sureshanaparti why do the mac addresses need to be the same on both
routers? We're also executing arpings to update our neighbours. Networking wise
there is no need for them to be the
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1957
@Ashadeepa why do we have 2 PRs for the same problem?
It seems that one of them can be closed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956#discussion_r102289931
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -744,14 +744,17 @@ protected boolean
Github user nathanejohnson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956#discussion_r102290456
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -744,14 +744,17 @@ protected boolean checkWorkItems(final
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102291066
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java ---
@@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956#discussion_r102292787
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -744,14 +744,17 @@ protected boolean
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102294407
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java ---
@@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO
Github user nathanejohnson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956#discussion_r102295771
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -744,14 +744,17 @@ protected boolean checkWorkItems(final
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1861
yes @sateesh-chodapuneedi this failure has been a pain for a while... it'll
be good to invest some time in fixing it..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
@Rajani @Rohit I missed this mail and fixed the apidoc on build.a.o yesterday.
I can disable it or throw it away might we so wish
daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Utrecht Utrecht 3531 VENetherlands
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From:
No there isn't any issue except having the bugs & fixes of the JDK you're
using. You can compile it with a JDK 1.8 as long as you don't change the
target bytecode version for 1.7
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Marco,
>
> Good point. Is there any issue
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
Trillian test result (tid-864)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 43562 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955
Very nice indeed! I will take a look asap.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user priyankparihar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1773
Hi @koushik-das @rajesh-battala ,
>The default value of forced is false, might cause issue on backwards
compatibility.
Should i make changes according to @serg38 and
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1872
Trillian test result (tid-860)
Environment: vmware-60u2 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 45192 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1779
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-517
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669
Added the missing license on one js file.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-519
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1949
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-518
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1949
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1949
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935
@nvazquez great work.
However, there is a catch there that I think you might have overlooked.
This problem is caused by the method extraction I suggested.
If you take a
Github user dmabry commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1915
@serbaut Can you do a force push to kick off jenkins again. I'm guessing
Jenkins just had an issue and not the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user sureshanaparti commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878
@remibergsma Same MAC for RVR has been re-introducted as part of
[CLOUDSTACK-985](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-985). It
confirms that peer NICs of RVRs should have
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo