Github user ramkatru commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1855
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user ramkatru commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1868
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r106313430
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +92,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r106311985
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +92,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r106306374
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +92,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r106303439
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +92,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Hi,
This one appears to have been fixed a long time ago. I marked it as Fixed and
closed the ticket.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1524
This one is not a big deal. I marked it as Won’t Fix and closed the ticket.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1432
I went
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@swill
first_i_p in json -> firstIP in java. This is formatted by google.gson
it is defined in api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/IpAddressTO.java, and used
in
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
Does anyone know what `first_i_p` represents in the `ips.json` dbag? I am
assuming it is the Source NAT IP, but I can't find it represented anywhere in
the code (other than in a test). If it
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r106001103
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +92,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
As far as I know, the log exists for a long time. However, I am not
aware of potential issues.
Hope that someone can share his/her wisdom on this one.
Cheers, Gabriel.
Em 15/03/2017 13:10, Jeff Hair escreveu:
It's coming from the config scripts on the routers, yes. This is version
4.9.2.0
It's coming from the config scripts on the routers, yes. This is version
4.9.2.0 (it's a fork, but should be similar enough to vanilla). I'm not
necessarily noticing problems with it. Connectivity from public IPs on
Isolated networks seem to be working. I'm just wondering what this message
means,
Hi Jeff,
Could you please provide more details (e.g. CloudStack version,
CloudStack management log)?
Seems that the log came from [1]. I will check on it.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/cs/CsAddress.py
Cheers,
Gabriel.
Em
sorry Rafael, I haven't taken the time to look at more then a few. Go
ahead, for my part
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Rafael Weingärtner
wrote:
> Folks,
> It has been a week. I am assuming that no one knows about these tickets.
>
> In the last years, our workflow
GitHub user olivierlemasle opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2008
Fix datetime format of snapshots events
Include the timezone in datetime format of snapshot events, to be
consistent with every other events.
"eventDateTime" was added by
Folks,
It has been a week. I am assuming that no one knows about these tickets.
In the last years, our workflow has been improved greatly; most of the PRs
I see have Jira ticket associated and everything seems to be getting better
by the time; let’s not loose momentum. However, we still have some
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r106188366
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/alert/AlertManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -767,7 +767,9 @@ public void sendAlert(AlertType alertType, long
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r106186279
--- Diff:
plugins/network-elements/netscaler/src/com/cloud/network/element/NetscalerElement.java
---
@@ -512,7 +512,11 @@ public void
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r106185631
--- Diff: engine/components-api/src/com/cloud/agent/AgentManager.java ---
@@ -141,7 +142,7 @@
public void
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r106185108
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/host/ReconnectHostCmd.java ---
@@ -100,17 +103,18 @@ public Long getInstanceId() {
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1918
Awesome! This seems a good approach to deal with the issue.
@jayakarteek and @nvazquez thanks for the effort.
@jayakarteek sorry for all of the stubbornness ;)
You
Github user GabrielBrascher commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1269
Thanks for the response @anshul1886.
I am sorry, but I disagree with you. I think that it gets more stable and
readable with less duplicated code. In my humble opinion, it is
Complete removal of the plugin was my solution to the problem of the jar
file's dependencies. If it's not used or maintained, then it should be
removed, in my opinion. Disabling it in the build is a good first step.
*Jeff Hair*
Technical Lead and Software Developer
Tel: (+354) 415 0200
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
nics in database seems ok, so it looks some issue in creating
ip_associations.json
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1918
@rafaelweingartner
Tried using both cpuentitlement cpu reservedCapacity but retrieved values
from vmware are zero.
While going through docs , I saw
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853#discussion_r106138864
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/dc/dao/DedicatedResourceDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -312,6 +317,65 @@ public DedicatedResourceVO findByHostId(Long hostId) {
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853#discussion_r106142726
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/deploy/DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -584,105 +583,64 @@ private void
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853#discussion_r106145072
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/deploy/DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -584,105 +583,64 @@ private void
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 469
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=102
Failed=3
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867#discussion_r106133214
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/SnapshotObject.java
---
@@ -191,7 +191,8 @@ public void
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867#discussion_r103894706
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1181,6 +1181,17 @@ public boolean configure(String name,
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867#discussion_r106134695
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java
---
@@ -194,18 +194,22 @@ protected
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867#discussion_r106137098
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1078,6 +1082,16 @@ public void cleanupStorage(boolean recurring) {
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2007
CLOUDSTACK-9834: prepareTemplate API call doesn't work well with XenServer
& Local SR (Db_exn.Uniqueness_constraint_violation)
removed the host uuid from SR label so that any host which has
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1988
@ustcweizhou @sebgoa @rhtyd can you review this as a first version of an
integrated plugin for application clusters. It is still very k8s specific and I
want to defer making it more
Hi,
I'm seeing this message in the logs when detaching IPs with
disableStaticNat. This is on a network without redundant routers. What
exactly dose "Not able to setup source-nat for a regular router yet" mean?
Does this cause functionality problems for non-redundant routers?
Jeff
Github user harikrishna-patnala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1180
Added test for the case where we need to list only clusters which has hosts
with host tag specified in the offering.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user sureshanaparti commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1879
@nvazquez Thanks for testing. I'll check and update accordingly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1944
@karuturi ping? can this be merged as well, this greatly improves the UI
performance for the existing metrics view feature as well as improves the load
time of the infrastructure tab
+1 as others have noted
Disable the plugin from the default build for next few releases and eventually
deprecate/remove the plugin from the codebase. The roadmap can look something
like:
- Announce on the MLs that we're planning to do this, send a PR and get it
accepted
- During the release
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@ustcweizhou
- I was able to restart the network with cleanup. New VR came up with
duplicated eth2 and eth3.
![screen shot 2017-03-15 at 9 48 33
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
code LGTM
@yvsubhash it would be nice if you can reformat part of the code with java
code conventions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@borisstoyanov moreover, can you please restart the network with cleanup,
to see if the new VRs can start ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user rashmidixit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1884
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user rashmidixit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1884
Closing this based on the new PR #1944.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
you are in.
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On March 14, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Pavan Kumar Aravapalli
(pavankuma...@persistent.com) wrote:
Hi,
I am unable to edit/add pages for the cwiki link
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.9+Design+Documents.
Can some one
Disable with a maven profile to enable? mvn –P withThisOrThat
Delete but only after a time span. A number of releases is not any kind of
promise in our case.
On 15/03/17 04:40, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote:
Disable, then delete works for me, too.
On 3/14/17,
GitHub user harikrishna-patnala opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2006
CLOUDSTACK-9833: Move configuration parameters from Config.java to use
configdepot
Following parameters are moved from config.java to configdepot.
This will make the management
48 matches
Mail list logo