Re: [4.10] repos

https://builds.cloudstack.org/view/release/job/build-systemvm is configured to push the systemvm for a version taken from a parameter On 12/07/17 08:45, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: AFAIK, there is no job that automatically pushes templates. I manually copied the

Re: Usage Server in Docker Simulator

Hi, Any idea how to start it when running in the Docker simulator? Obviously the service talked about here[1] isn’t available in the container, so I can’t just 'service cloudstack-usage restart’. [1]:

Re: Usage Server in Docker Simulator

maybe a double post due to mail issues: Ok, then it isn’t installed but that it can. # yum install cloudstack-usage assuming centos as base. It makes sense to look at the docker definition and do it there On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:07 AM, John McDonnell wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: Usage Server in Docker Simulator

Ok, then it isn’t installed but that it can. # yum install cloudstack-usageit makes sense to look at the docker definition and do it there On 12/07/17 09:07, "John McDonnell" wrote: Hi, Any idea how to start it when running in the Docker simulator?

Re: next major release

Thanks Rajani, I created the upgrade paths and am no test compiling. Expect a PR in the next hour (I added the new path to every version not just past 4.0) On 12/07/17 08:41, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: I made the pom changes on master to 4.11.0.0-SNAPSHOT 4.10

Re: [4.10] repos

Monsieur, The job should be altered to go into 4.11. lemme look. On 12/07/17 02:06, "Pierre-Luc Dion" wrote: Hi, I've created new jenkins jobs [1] to create package for our release, The jobs pushed rpm's but for systemvm, look like there is a wget job

Re: Usage Server in Docker Simulator

Are you running the usage server? It is a different service and run independently of the mgmt server -- Erik ons. 12. jul. 2017 kl. 00.25 skrev John McDonnell : > Hi, > > I asked this back in April on the Users mailing list and the response > I got was that the

Re: [4.10] repos

AFAIK, there is no job that automatically pushes templates. I manually copied the templates from build https://builds.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-master-systemvm/272/ to http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/ Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On July 12,

Re: next major release

I made the pom changes on master to 4.11.0.0-SNAPSHOT 4.10 branch is created master and 4.10 can now accept changes once the upgrade paths are in place. Release notes and release announcement are the pending items now. Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On July 12, 2017

Re: [DISCUSS] drop support for CentOS6 with 4.10

Hi Will, I'm not sure what you want, but the scripts/files are here: https://github.com/shapeblue/Trillian/tree/master/Ansible/roles - Rohit From: Will Stevens Sent: 11 July 2017 17:47:06 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re:

[DISCUSS] Host HA in 4.11

All, Few months ago I had started discussion on Host HA for CloudStack and given 4.10 is voted and to be announced with master branch cut I would like to re-kick discussion around reviewing and acceptance of the feature that is pending since Feb 2017. To briefly share some key points: -

Re: Travis failing on PRs

All, Based on the reviews and Marvin test runs, I've merged and fwd-merged the branch to 4.10 and master branches. From now onwards, our PRs will get tested against latest Travis images using openjdk (previously used oraclejdk). - Rohit From: Rohit Yadav

Re: [DISCUSS] drop support for CentOS6 with 4.10

Thanks Rohit. On Jul 12, 2017 6:32 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: Hi Will, I'm not sure what you want, but the scripts/files are here: https://github.com/shapeblue/Trillian/tree/master/Ansible/roles - Rohit From: Will Stevens

Re: Usage Server in Docker Simulator

John, too bad but that indeed means it isn’t running. You can double check with # service cloudstack-usage status cloudstack-usage is stopped and if need be # service cloudstack-usage start Starting CloudStack Usage Monitor cloudstack-usage [ OK ] I am not running the

Re: [DISCUSS] Host HA in 4.11

We are very excited about this feature set, as it adds some really important features for KVM. We don't use NFS, so I think our goal will be seeing what we can contribute to include Ceph on the supported storage list. - Si From: Rohit Yadav

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All, Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release plan as soon as next week. - Rohit From: Wido den Hollander Sent: 12 July 2017

Re: Cloudstack dev Noob start :-)

Sorry Oliver, I don't think we use such a tag. Good suggestion though. For now, look at findbugs and such tools for things you could re-factor. On 12/07/17 13:42, "Olivier Lamy" wrote: Hi Yes I dropped all databases. But I was trying to create manually by myself

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > > Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can > freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a > release plan as soon as next week. > > Support for

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9813) Use configdrive for userdata, metadata & password

We've also seen in the past initiatives like object store and 'secondary storage free' zones. We may not want to cement the idea that we have secondary storage as a mountable filesystem that is highly available. On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:40 PM Marcus wrote: > Can we not

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9813) Use configdrive for userdata, metadata & password

Can we not rely on secondary storage for config drive? I'd much rather see it generated dynamically into a temp space during VM start, or (less desirable) even during VM create on primary storage (perhaps in a configdrive) directory where the root disk resides. It just seems like a bad idea to