Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC2

Hi guys, I’ve did some upgrade testing of RC2. I did upgraded database successfully from 4.5.2.2, 4.9.3 and 4.11.1, but unfortunately I’ve run into a connectivity issue between vmware 4.5u3 environments. Looks like TLS1.2 is not supported at first glance. Caused by: javax.net.ssl.SSLH

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC2

Hi On 09/28/2018 05:21 PM, Boris Stoyanov wrote: > Hi guys, > > I’ve did some upgrade testing of RC2. I did upgraded database successfully > from 4.5.2.2, 4.9.3 and 4.11.1, but unfortunately I’ve run into a > connectivity issue between vmware 4.5u3 environments. > > Looks like TLS1.2 is not s

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC2

Thanks Rene, that worked! We have a +1 then. Bobby. boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue > On 28 Sep 2018, at 11:38, Rene Moser wrote: > > Hi > > On 09/28/2018 05:21 PM, Boris Stoyanov wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I

Re: [DISCUSS] Release effort for 4.11.2.0

Hi, Rohit: Back in July, there was a thread discussion here about CLOUDSTACK-10240. The gist of it is that the PR for CLOUDSTACK-10240 was merged into 4.11.x branch and it introduced a regression. My question here is whether the fix for said regression is included in 4.11.2.0 RC1 and onwards

Re: [DISCUSS] Release effort for 4.11.2.0

Hi Yiping, Based on what I can understand, the fix most likely went into master but not the 4.11 branch. I've pinged Rafael on the PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2761 - Rohit From: Yiping Zhang Sent: Friday,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release effort for 4.11.2.0

Hello Yiping Zhang, It was a misunderstanding. CLOUDSTACK-10240 was never merged into 4.11. It was only merged into master (4.12). Indeed we had a problem with managed storage, but Mike and I already fixed it. However, it did not affect any released version of ACS. On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 12:56 P

Re: [DISCUSS] Release effort for 4.11.2.0

Hi, Rafael: I am glad to get the final word here, and much relieved that 4.11.1.0 was not affected after all! Thanks, Yiping On 9/28/18, 11:54 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner" wrote: Hello Yiping Zhang, It was a misunderstanding. CLOUDSTACK-10240 was never merged into 4.11. It was

Re: [DISCUSS] Release effort for 4.11.2.0

Welcome. The problem is already fixed in 4.12 too. Em sex, 28 de set de 2018 15:25, Yiping Zhang escreveu: > Hi, Rafael: > > I am glad to get the final word here, and much relieved that 4.11.1.0 was > not affected after all! > > Thanks, > > Yiping > > On 9/28/18, 11:54 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner"