Some questions:
- Is there a concept of generic permission (any action, any resource etc.)?
There shouldn't be a need to define hundreds of explicit permissions for admin
account.
- I think it would be good to have a notion of parent policy. This will avoid
duplication of permissions.
- Can
Team,
Regarding note1 below, if we can have status\fault\return codes returned for
every API atleast for new additions going ahead as part of the response, that
should be good i believe.
Even for blocking\nonblocking calls, we can have some status codes provided, so
that we user can take
On Jan 21, 2014, at 10:57 PM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote:
Min and myself would like to propose an identity and access management plugin
for CloudStack for the ACS 4.4 release.
Here is the functional spec we have drafted for the first phase:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17116/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2014, 10:54 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Girish
Please find the FS for this proposal at below link. I will be sending out
a different proposal covering the enhancements called out in the FS.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Region+level+VPC+and
+guest+network+spanning+multiple+zones
On 19/12/13 5:54 PM, Murali Reddy
Heya,
In the past there have been several occasions where people missed the required
headers when committing a files (and a disproportionate amount of those commits
were mine ;-) ). Look at how other projects solve that issue i ran into the
mycila license plugin. This is a maven plugin that
Heya,
The disable profile is in the pom now. If you add the profile disablecheckstyle
to your eclipse m2e configuration for cloudstack, all checkstyle configuration
from maven will be ignored.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 16 jan. 2014, at 16:11, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
That
Demetrius,
From a development point of view I would oppose to such a feature. Of
course we can en-/disable it by a build profile.
Further more it should imo be configurable as to what the format must
be that the password adheres to.
Hope this spikes some opposition,
Daan
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16249/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2014, 2:07 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Murali
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15280/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2014, 2:09 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and daan
Are you using the revert process or the one that makes a branch for
the release? (is my commit the latest on the build_asf.sh script?)
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
While building the ACS 4.3 RC I ran into the same issue as seen by Abhi
Please check again guys, it would seems that my code was used (does
not do a revert but commits on a new branch.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com wrote:
One solution was given by Dan where he suggested that for RC we create a
branch. That I guess
some questions I have:
1. Do we need groups and policies? Cant we derive group information from policy
applied? ie) any user can become domain admin if he is given the right policies.
2. Can we restrict the permission to Resource Type's CRUD? permissions at api
level seems to be like too much of
Hi Dan,
Sorry, I missed this email when you sent it. I double checked 4.2 today
and doesn't look like this was applied.
Here is what I currently see on 4.2
in server/src/com/cloud/network/lb/LoadBalancingRulesManagerImpl.java:
if (generateUsageEvent) {
// Generate usage
I would +1 Demetrius' initial suggestion, however its not just blacklists, its
masking to make sure that the pwd's are of sufficient strength
I expect some form of password strength control in every aspect of IT these
days and I shudder when I type Root and password into our labs builds !
I
Definitely needs to be something that users can turn off/on.
Maybe a visual tool on the interface showing the 'strength' of the password,
like most user facing sites have these days.
Alex Hitchins
+44 7788 423 969
-Original Message-
From: Giles Sirett
On 21.01.2014 22:56, Prabhakaran Ganesan wrote:
Hi Wido
Thanks a lot for your response. I happened to have a i686 Centos
host,
hence the question. Let me upgrade the server to x86_64 and give it a
try.
At best you will be able to use a 32bit machine as a management server,
(RH)EL 6
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17188/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
Thanks, Nux. I have upgraded my host to x86_64.
BTW, I was able to get VirtualBox working on my 32-bit host. Devcloud VM
came up fine on the host and I was able to run the management server also
as a VM (on centos x86_64). But I had trouble getting the management
server working on the host. But I
Hi,
Prior to the break we had a discussion to move to a new doc format RST.
In investigating the process and the infra needed for this, David and I thought
that having a repo for each guide/book would be good.
Otherwise the readthedocs build infra will create one massive pdf/epub, think
~400
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17188/#review32499
---
Ship it!
Thanks for the patch Alex. applied to 4.3 forward
Personally, I think if possible;
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org could go to a page with both sets available,
linking to
http://admin.docs.cloudstack.apache.org
http://install.docs.cloudstack.apache.org
My thinking is docs.cloudstack.apache.org is easier to remember.
I wonder if there is a
Animesh, et al:
Please consider cherry-picking
78f62c63479a81383ff8957a12c88ee4c181cfda from 4.3-forward if you
haven't cut the release yet.
--David
Comments/Critiques/Additions to this list as well as implementation
suggestions are requested.
After looking at the differences between Public cloud routing and Virtual
Private Cloud Routing it appears the main differences are:
Public Cloud VPC
Hi Koushik,
See my answers in line.
Thanks.
-min
On 1/22/14 12:30 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
Some questions:
- Is there a concept of generic permission (any action, any resource
etc.)? There shouldn't be a need to define hundreds of explicit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17188/#review32508
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alexander Hitchins
On Jan. 22, 2014, 5:03
Sorry for this email all - Please ignore.
Alex Hitchins
+44 7788 423 969
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Hitchins [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of
Alexander Hitchins
Sent: 22 January 2014 18:10
To: Alex Hitchins; cloudstack
Subject: Re: Review Request 17188: CS-5438
All,
I've just been looking at the Developer Resources for Apache CloudStack guide :
http://cloudstack.apache.org/developers.html
At the bottom it states that once the review has been approved you need to go
in to the review dashboard, select outgoing requests then mark as closed
selecting
Please consider cherry picking the following from 4.3-forward:
0679af343453bf888f0ddefdd36937713aacbc28
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
Hi Rajani,
See my answers in line.
Thanks
On 1/22/14 6:29 AM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
some questions I have:
1. Do we need groups and policies? Cant we derive group information from
policy applied? ie) any user can become domain admin if he is given the
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:16 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal]CloudStack IAM plugin feature (CLOUDSTACK-5920)
Hi Rajani,
See my answers in line.
Thanks
On 1/22/14 6:29 AM,
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:41 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal]CloudStack IAM plugin feature (CLOUDSTACK-5920)
On Jan 21, 2014, at 10:57 PM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote:
Min and
I am trying to bring up DevCloud with 4.3 and ran into this issue. Can I
use the cloud-install-sys-tmplt script to upgrade the system vm template
inside DevCloud VM (/opt/storage/secondary)?
Thanks
Prabhakar
On 1/20/14 12:07 AM, Kishan Kavala kishan.kav...@citrix.com wrote:
After commit
I was able to bring up the tinylinux VM on DevCloud by setting
router.version.check to false.
Thanks
Prabhakar
On 1/22/14 10:45 AM, Prabhakaran Ganesan gprab...@juniper.net wrote:
I am trying to bring up DevCloud with 4.3 and ran into this issue. Can I
use the cloud-install-sys-tmplt script to
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Alex Hitchins
alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com wrote:
All,
I've just been looking at the Developer Resources for Apache CloudStack guide
: http://cloudstack.apache.org/developers.html
At the bottom it states that once the review has been approved you need to go
Thanks David for letting me know and thanks for doing all the necessary to the
review! Much appreciated.
Cheers,
Alex
Alex Hitchins
+44 7788 423 969
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: 22 January 2014 19:49
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Again, Karl, please keep the relevant things in ONE mail thread.
Please don't start one thread every time you posted in the community.
You can simply reply the thread you posted before, address people's
comment, and also would keep the people involved know what's going on.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014
Hope I get this thread correct.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Again, Karl, please keep the relevant things in ONE mail thread.
Please don't start one thread every time you posted in the community.
You can simply reply the thread you posted before,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16867/#review32543
---
test/integration/component/test_remotevpn_vpc.py
Hi,
James Page from Canonical just pointed me to a thread [0] on the Ubuntu
Cloud list where the discussion started to remove OpenJDK7/Tomcat from
Ubuntu main.
He asked me what the impact would be regarding to CloudStack if users
would have to fetch OpenJDK and Tomcat from a 3rd party repo,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
Hi,
James Page from Canonical just pointed me to a thread [0] on the Ubuntu
Cloud list where the discussion started to remove OpenJDK7/Tomcat from
Ubuntu main.
He asked me what the impact would be regarding to
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.comwrote:
Hope I get this thread correct.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Again, Karl, please keep the relevant things in ONE mail thread.
Please don't start one thread every time you
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Public Cloud VPC
One private network connection Multiple (1…n) private
networks (tiers?)
Single router/1 NIC public/1 NIC private Single
Reached out to @strikesme and @danwendlandt
On 1/21/14 10:14 PM, Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
We are now again at the exact same point as where Darren was.
This is the legal ticket relevant to the license discussion:
Done, should see an RC build soon
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 9:43 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 4.3.0 patch request (CLOUDSTACK-5438)
Animesh, et al:
Please consider cherry-picking
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 6:27 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Xapi version in pom.xml updated erroneously
Are you using the revert process or the one that makes a branch for the
release? (is my commit the latest
Done
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:15 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 4.3.0 Patch Request (CLOUDSTACK-5873)
Please consider cherry picking the following from 4.3-forward:
Hi,
I was wondering if we had any plans in the near future to order information
in our tables, combo boxes, etc. in some expected way by default?
For example, I recently created five VMs: VM-1, VM-2, VM-3, VM-4, and VM-5
(created in that order).
When I go to attach a disk to VM-2, for example,
Master build failing with below error, any one faced this?
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal com.mycila:license-maven-plugin:2.5:check
(cloudstack-checklicence) on project cloud-plugin-network-nvp: Resource
LICENSE.header not found in file system, classpath or URL: no protocol:
LICENSE.header
I am seeing it too.
On 1/22/14, 3:23 PM, Rayees Namathponnan
rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com wrote:
Master build failing with below error, any one faced this?
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal com.mycila:license-maven-plugin:2.5:check
(cloudstack-checklicence) on project cloud-plugin-network-nvp:
Master VMware was broken by this commit
author Hugo
Trippaershttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=search;h=b20add810e5751f53946f695b6223a8016f104a5;s=Hugo+Trippaers;st=author
FYI, I checked in a fix 206c35c620a8e7a707f371e5a9e5dfd795912f5b for this
to unblock my testing.
Thanks
-min
On 1/22/14 5:43 PM, Kelven Yang kelven.y...@citrix.com wrote:
Master VMware was broken by this commit
author Hugo
I am seeing this as well.
On 22/01/14 4:43 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
wrote:
I am seeing it too.
On 1/22/14, 3:23 PM, Rayees Namathponnan
rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com wrote:
Master build failing with below error, any one faced this?
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
I am able to access the URL https://issues.apache.org, but issues filter is not
working.
Regards,
Rayees
Hi,
I was wondering if someone who deals with networking in CloudStack might
know something about this.
I have a development setup with one zone, one pod, and three clusters (one
VMware, one XenServer, and one KVM).
The IP addresses I've given to CloudStack span from 192.168.128.20 to
The IP address that CloudStack says is assigned to VM i-2-11-VM
(192.168.128.28) does not appear to be assigned to any VM in the system
(user or system VM).
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if someone who deals with
Slight correction (this may have been obvious from one of my screen shots):
The VM with the address outside of the range I gave to CloudStack is in a
XenServer cluster.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
The IP address that CloudStack says is
Hi,
Could someone please help me with the location of the System VM Templates for
4.3 release ?
I am unable to access http://download.cloud.com. I assume that they are posted
to templates directory.
Thanks
-Radhika
Hi Mike,
Can you please check the db table user_ip_address to see what are the ips
addresses are there.
IP will be picked from this table.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 23-Jan-2014, at 10:35 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Slight correction (this may have been obvious from one
Hi Jayapal,
That table has 8 rows and includes IP addresses from 192.168.128.23 to
192.168.128.30 (which should be correct).
Thanks
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
Can you please check the db table user_ip_address to see
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
Commit: 43d485c92d5919085cacb1cd0c7e78503ab9788a
List of changes:
Mike, you might have another machine serving up DHCP on that network. If
thats the case get it to ignore cloudstack assigned mac addresses (06
prefix).
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi Jayapal,
That table has 8 rows and includes IP
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16867/#review32596
---
test/integration/component/test_remotevpn_vpc.py
That is an interesting possibility. Thanks, guys
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike, you might have another machine serving up DHCP on that network. If
thats the case get it to ignore cloudstack assigned mac addresses (06
prefix).
On Wed, Jan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16178/#review32598
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On Jan. 14, 2014, 8:51
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16780/
---
(Updated Jan. 23, 2014, 6:17 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
I was able to get them from path like:
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2013-12-23-hyperv.vhd.bz2
Regards,
Abhisek
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:15 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Location of the
Sorry about that :-( Thanks for finding and fixing it.
Where did you encounter the error? I wonder why i didn’t catch it with my tests
against vmware.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 23 jan. 2014, at 03:01, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
FYI, I checked in a fix
The best location for the system vm images is
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm/. There we
have the systemvm images that belong to the latest build agains the 4.3 tree.
Look for the 'Last Successful Artifacts’ on that page.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 23 jan. 2014, at
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16780/
---
(Updated Jan. 23, 2014, 7:13 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17231/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Reddy.
Bugs:
Hi all,
How can I specify the default network of the VM while deploying the VM in
multiple networks? The API deployVirtualMachine has networkids
parameter which takes list of network ids, but how does it decide the
default network?
Regards,
Gaurav
Thanks Sheng!
Regards,
Gaurav
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
The first one in the list would be used as the default network, as design.
--Sheng
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Gaurav Aradhye
gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com
wrote:
Hi all,
How
Team,
1. We are seeing a build failure for latest 4.3-forward branch code. Below is
the error message:
Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine API SUCCESS [2.351s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Core SUCCESS [4.720s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Agents
I am also facing this issue.
-Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 1:20 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Build on 4.3-forward Fails: Shows Failure for Framework-Clustering
Team,
1. We are
75 matches
Mail list logo