Hi Santhosh,
Alex has reviewed below review request and marked it as “Ship it”, so can you
please assign it to appropriate person to get it committed.
Thanks,
Vinay
From: Alex Brett [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Alex Brett
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 9:45 PM
To: Alex
my 2 cents again:
Whether we have this LTS release or not - is not just about having release
- we need a WAY to focus here on FIXING, POLISHING product and more
important to stimulate/make developers interested in doing so.
If this was company owned product, it would be very easy to set goals,
But being such a small community right now, I think its great to see Exoscale
creating developer roles around Cloudstack and agree, right now, that this is
the most sensible place to post them - really good news Antoine.
At the same time its worth mentioning that ShapeBlue have a number of
On Nov 27, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
my 2 cents again:
Whether we have this LTS release or not - is not just about having release
- we need a WAY to focus here on FIXING, POLISHING product and more
important to stimulate/make developers interested in
I don't mind seeing job offers from good guy companies like Exoscale who are
active in the community and contribute back, especially at this moment in time
when this kind of thing is a rarity so to say.
If the volume of postings increases it will become annoying and linkedin or
some other
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17941/
---
(Updated Nov. 27, 2014, 9:22 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal
See this diff:
Hugos-MacBook-Pro-7:cloudstack hugo (master)$ git diff master 4.5
setup/db/db/schema-442to450.sql
diff --git a/setup/db/db/schema-442to450.sql b/setup/db/db/schema-442to450.sql
index f84bca6..083943b 100644
--- a/setup/db/db/schema-442to450.sql
+++ b/setup/db/db/schema-442to450.sql
List of commit that introduced the changes in master, hope this helps a bit in
tracking down where to look. If i can help let me know.
057ba164 Sanjay Tripathi
e02c3824 Anthony Xu
6f413c22 Frank Zhang
1091d458 Kishan Kavala
Cheers,
Hugo
On 27 nov. 2014, at 10:32, Hugo Trippaers
Please take note that people that made the change probably made it to
schema-441to450.sql which I renamed.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
See this diff:
Hugos-MacBook-Pro-7:cloudstack hugo (master)$ git diff master 4.5
setup/db/db/schema-442to450.sql
Hello,
I clearly hesitated prior to posting it on the ML due to « commercial »
nature of this, but since almost everybody here is actively looking for
talents, it is best if we can make some noise about it.
Hopefully with all those jobs, that will be some great improvements for
the product.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17941/#review63196
---
Ship it!
+1
LGTM, if any of the other designated reviewers don't
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24991/#review63197
---
Heya,
sorry for the late review. I promised to look at it earlier
On Nov. 27, 2014, 10:15 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
+1
LGTM, if any of the other designated reviewers don't object let's merge
this on master/4.5; I've already picked/fixed this for 4.3 branch.
Hari - thanks for the patch, I encourage you to use Github Pull Requests in
future which
On Nov. 27, 2014, 10:15 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
+1
LGTM, if any of the other designated reviewers don't object let's merge
this on master/4.5; I've already picked/fixed this for 4.3 branch.
Hari - thanks for the patch, I encourage you to use Github Pull Requests in
future which
On Nov. 27, 2014, 10:15 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
+1
LGTM, if any of the other designated reviewers don't object let's merge
this on master/4.5; I've already picked/fixed this for 4.3 branch.
Hari - thanks for the patch, I encourage you to use Github Pull Requests in
future which
hi,
LTS means Long Term Support , for ubuntu means 5 years support for both
desktop and server distributions. If we adopt to release cloudstack's LTS
version , how many years should we support ? 5 years ? of course can not
accept ! even 3 years may be too long to old for support as a IAAS
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28511/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7412
On Sept. 4, 2014, 8:28 a.m., Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
applied to master with 355eb72c7d3a3bf29d6d1a2185a5973bc511ed77
and applied to hotfix/4.4-7405
It did not apply cleanly on 4.3, so I will not apply it there and keep it
at Erik's patch in vmdata.py
thanks for the patch,
On Aug. 26, 2014, 8:39 p.m., Fred Clift wrote:
./systemvm/patches/debian/config/var/www/html/latest/.htaccess
That file has a stub-version of the file, and is pre-seeded with one
rewrite rule...
looks like this:
Options +FollowSymLinks
RewriteEngine On
On Nov. 27, 2014, 10:15 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
+1
LGTM, if any of the other designated reviewers don't object let's merge
this on master/4.5; I've already picked/fixed this for 4.3 branch.
Hari - thanks for the patch, I encourage you to use Github Pull Requests in
future which
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/707/changes
If this contains db upgrade code, where did this go in 4.3? In the
review request I see changes to 442to450 upgrade files so this should
not go in 4.3 or 4.4. What am I missing?
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Nov. 27, 2014, 10:15 a.m., Rohit Yadav
On Nov 26, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
wrote:
I’m +1 on this. I hope the original contributors and developers continue to
invest energy into maintaining it (rather than hoping that the community
comes for free, just as a side-effect of being in ACS).
we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28511/#review63211
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rajani Karuturi
On Nov. 27, 2014, 10:38
On Nov. 20, 2014, 6:33 p.m., edison su wrote:
seems it's already checked into master and 4.5 by Nitin? see commit:
5393387bbd4e2d3659fb0c7171e6ff347ad6a07b
David Bierce wrote:
This was a backport to 4.2 and 4.3
David, the applies cleanly on 4.2 so I've merged it but it fails on
On Nov. 27, 2014, 11:30 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Ship It!
Thanks for the detailed explanation and the patch. I will push this to the
relevant branches.
- Rajani
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20518/#review63214
---
Hi Hari, should we backport this to 4.3? If yes, please send a
On Nov. 27, 2014, 11:30 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Ship It!
Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Thanks for the detailed explanation and the patch. I will push this to
the relevant branches.
4.3: 0e0827f07c47289dc210dd50551c4c6df26d0573
4.4: d15033675b05a116905d5b19c697a1ef7bf52aaf
4.5:
On Nov. 20, 2014, 6:33 p.m., edison su wrote:
seems it's already checked into master and 4.5 by Nitin? see commit:
5393387bbd4e2d3659fb0c7171e6ff347ad6a07b
David Bierce wrote:
This was a backport to 4.2 and 4.3
Rohit Yadav wrote:
David, the applies cleanly on 4.2 so I've
ok, so that would go in 442to443?
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Daan,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
If this contains db upgrade code, where did this go in 4.3? In the
review request I see changes to
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
ok, so that would go in 442to443?
Yes, but do you plan to do a 4.4.3? The whole debate around maintaining 4.3
vs 4.4 comes down to stakeholder's interests, you've shared that you may
not want to put a lot of efforts
ChunFeng,
I think as long as there is a change to the current efforts it will improve the
stability of the product. At the moment, it is clearly not working very well
for the end users, otherwise, we would not be discussing this topic.
As to answer your previous concerns, I agree, having a 5
Added commit 1091d458 to 4.5 branch.
Regards,
Kishan
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 3:14 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Differences in schema-442to450.sql between 4.5 and master
Please take note that people that made
I dont like the idea of release manager cherry-picking/backporting the
fixes to the release branches.
As a community we are supporting past two releases. ie) at this point we
have to support 4.3 and 4.4
As a developer/contributor, if I feel a bug is relevant for 4.3 I should be
committing it to
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/708/changes
Thanks Kishan!
Cheers,
Hugo
On 27 nov. 2014, at 13:50, Kishan Kavala kishan.kav...@citrix.com wrote:
Added commit 1091d458 to 4.5 branch.
Regards,
Kishan
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 3:14 PM
To:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/46
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
HiI viewed the bash script that resets Linux password
(http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/bindir/cloud-set-guest-password.in)It
seems that it doesn't use a secure way for transferring password string to
instance.Instances on a shared network can sniff password requests and export
Hi Rajani,
I've already started a thread on user/dev ML around LTS releases, we should
have discussion there.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
I dont like the idea of release manager cherry-picking/backporting the
fixes to the release branches.
As a
Just a quick note to confirm that Interoute is indeed hiring as well a
Cloudstack developer to be based in our London office, feel free to drop me an
email directly for additional info. I was wondering if maybe we could have a
separate mailing list for CS-related roles (e.g.
+1 on this, Alireza I think it would be best if you submitted a bug in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Alireza Eskandari astro.alir...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Lucian, I send email here to see developers opinion about this issue and
discuss about it.I'll open a jira ticket about it soon.Thanks for your +1 :)
From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alireza Eskandari astro.alir...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 7:58
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
If I understand this clearly, this annotation was introduced by Kelven to
prevent people from mistakenly removing those annotated methods if they find
from IDE that those methods are not explicitly called anywhere. These methods
are actually invoked through reflection.
Thanks
-min
On Nov
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
If any one needs something build or tested on CentOS 7 let me know or
create a build tagged for cloudstack-buildslave-centos7
Cheers,
Hugo
P.S. Still looking for people willing to add slaves to jenkins. What we
need
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Thanks to Rohit Andrei shares focus on this topic .
I am +1 on we should reshape the rhythm of new release .
btw,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel
Since the 2004 release of the 2.6 kernel, Linux no longer uses this system,
and has a much shorter release cycle.
In 2004,
sorry for the late response, I've tested following upgrade:
4.4.0 - 4.4.1 - 4.4.2
4.4.0 - 4.4.2
so far all work fine, but from frest 4.4.0 , manual alter table in MySQL
is require. I'll update the Release Notes...
PL
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
What is your
It came in through the discussion on this thread
http://markmail.org/message/j7ird7yzb3pvszbw
~Rajani
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
If I understand this clearly, this annotation was introduced by Kelven to
prevent people from mistakenly removing those
Hi,
This patch was only intended to put in 4.5 and master and later it was back
ported to 4.3.
If you can help me adding the upgrade path from 4.4.2 to 4.4.3, I’ll put the PR
for back porting to 4.4.3
Thanks,
Harikrishna
On 27-Nov-2014, at 8:59 pm, Rohit Yadav
How to skip some child projects maven test intentionally ?
I am now building my coding development environment , of course , I do not need
some sub projects , such as : Network Brocade VCS, Midokura Midonet etc .
When I run command : mvn install -P developer,systemvm , maven list all sub
Try -D skiTests
---
Thanks,
Yitao(依涛 姜)
jiangyt.github.io
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 3:12 PM, ChunFeng chunf...@domolo.com wrote:
How to skip some child projects maven test intentionally ?
I am now building my coding development environment , of course , I do not
need some sub projects ,
55 matches
Mail list logo
