Just discovered this, which seems like a possible diamond,
http://capgemini.github.io/devops/apollo/
I'll be trying to find some spare time to see if it's possible to get
running on CloudStack with a reasonable CloudStack, but would love to hear
from anyone doing the same.
--
Erik
Saw it too , +1
-Sebastien
On 8 May 2015, at 07:34, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
Just discovered this, which seems like a possible diamond,
http://capgemini.github.io/devops/apollo/
I'll be trying to find some spare time to see if it's possible to get
running on CloudStack with
Yes, for that matter - I place question for any S3 style storage :)
Just need some integration guidelines...
Thx
On May 8, 2015 2:58 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Not entirely sure, but is there anything about the other object stores(S3)?
They should all work the same with NFS
Hi Dakshesh,
It seems no change in analysis. Is it like it has not hit the schedule yet
and so is the reason? Right now, it still reflects march 16, 2015 as last
analyzed date on scan portal.
Santhosh
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Dakshesh Vyas dv...@coverity.com wrote:
Hi,
We have
Fixed the checkstyle issue, somehow the version string in that module's pom.xml
did not update.
On 08-May-2015, at 2:59 am, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Unfortunately, no - it seems that dependency has never been cached before.
On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Marcus
Jenkins on that slave didn't start up after a reboot, I'm looking into it
(just have to update Java first).
Has anyone tried to compile it on Linux?
--
Erik
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Anshul Gangwar anshul.gang...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi,
It seems CloudStack Hyper-V agent on jenkins
I hear beer is cheap in Dublin (compared to Norway atleast), so shouldn't
be much of a problem? :-)
--
Erik
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
Nice try Daan, but you still own us a beer ;)
Cheers,
Le jeudi 7 mai 2015, Daan Hoogland
Looking at the code, it seems the SwiftImageStoreDriverImpl selects an
SSVM(EndPoint) and issues a DownloadCommand to it. So the SSVM would need
access to it, most likely via the public interface, but you could also
probably get to it via the management interface via the
all your beer is belong to us
Op vr 8 mei 2015 om 01:30 schreef Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com:
Nice try Daan, but you still own us a beer ;)
Cheers,
Le jeudi 7 mai 2015, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com a écrit :
I will never admit to anything again and as a matter of fact I
Hi,
It seems CloudStack Hyper-V agent on jenkins
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-master-hyperv-agent is not
building on master from march 12.
Please check.
Regards,
Anshul
It's back up again, sorry for the downtime.
--
Erik
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
Jenkins on that slave didn't start up after a reboot, I'm looking into it
(just have to update Java first).
Has anyone tried to compile it on Linux?
--
Erik
On
Yes.
Its building fine on linux with mono.
Regards,
Anshul
On 08-May-2015, at 2:05 pm, Erik Weber
terbol...@gmail.commailto:terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
Jenkins on that slave didn't start up after a reboot, I'm looking into it
(just have to update Java first).
Has anyone tried to compile it on
Thx Marcus - we might go than over Public S3/Swift URL - its all local
network and over 10G - so would work for us fine - I will check.
Otherwise, I might trunk secondary storage network to Swift nodes as well,
so no routing, local attached swiftSSVM.
Thanks again
On 8 May 2015 at 09:10,
GitHub user miurahr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/pull/3
Fix KeyError: 'TERM' when no TERM exist
There is no TERM environment variable if CLI is called from python script
in docker container.
It cause ```KeyError: 'TERM'``` because it
In the New Features section I would suggest clarifying that the
Baremetal Provisioning for Advanced Networks feature is only supported
by VMware, at least according to the spec page.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Rohit Yadav
Thanks!
On Friday, May 8, 2015, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Fixed the checkstyle issue, somehow the version string in that module's
pom.xml did not update.
On 08-May-2015, at 2:59 am, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
javascript:; wrote:
Unfortunately, no -
Appreciated info Rohit.
As we verified our NFS storage there is no permission restrictions (* FULL
ACCESS).
Validated the same NFS share on the Cloud Stack Hypervisors, already mounted
and data visible.
We try to mount the NFS volume in the SSVM manually but its throwing error.
Unable to
GitHub user gauravaradhye opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/239
CLOUDSTACK-8453: Fix DB result check in test_VirtualRouter_alerts.py
After stopping the apache service, the alerts in database is matched
currently with the string Monitoring Service on
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/239
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hi Logan,
On 08-May-2015, at 4:14 pm, Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com wrote:
In the New Features section I would suggest clarifying that the
Baremetal Provisioning for Advanced Networks feature is only supported
by VMware, at least according to the spec page.
Good points, can you
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#issuecomment-100262595
Looks good, I see you've remove tomcat requirement as a package dependency.
Is this embedding tomcat so we won't need to install on the distro? I can help
test it
Srini,
you need to make sure the nfs server is configured properly to allow access
from SSVM, as you can see, the access is denied. please check that the nfs
server supports the same protocol version as ssvm is requesting. Most likely,
it's nfs v3.
Check logs on the nfs server to verify why
https://github.com/citrix/foreman-cloudstack
--David
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hello,
I'm playing with The Foreman these days and promises a lot. Ideally I'd like
to use ACS as a Foreman provider (ie Foreman should be able to provision ACS
instances), but
Thanks David, I found that, but thought it was for deploying/managing
hypervisors.
Anyway, it does not help me as I do not use Adv zone. Good job, though!
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: David Nalley
What user are you trying to mount with? If using root, try to add
no_root_squash to the exports file on the NFS server, or just mount as a
different user.
Check SELinux, depending on the mountpoint's location, this may be an issue
(check the audit log for avc's or just set to permissive/disabled
Github user rsafonseca commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#issuecomment-100282638
Yes, it completely removes the need to have tomcat installed in the distro,
and at the same time won't conflict if there is any other version of tomcat
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#issuecomment-100315706
Thanks @rsafonseca, it sounds great. While I think I had removed awsapi
related tomcat stuff with commit 58999da it's possible I may have missed few
spots, or a
Dave,
I'll pull a new log of me trying to move the virtual router from one
agent to another later today. I'll be sure to include logs from both
agents and the management server.
-- Mike
On 2015-05-08 13:58, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Moving this to dev, Mike. Probably more understanding of
On 2015-05-08 13:58, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Moving this to dev, Mike. Probably more understanding of the matter available
there.
I don't understand the periode between 2015-05-08 09:58:13,766 until
2015-05-08 09:58:14,491
All of your log from the source host is between only two of
Github user rsafonseca commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#issuecomment-100317657
Yes, I'll take care of that.. i just haven't removed the old tomcat files
of other installers so that this PR wouldn't break building on any OS, as
is.
Hi Mike,
From the logs, there seems to be something wrong with the configured interface:
Cannot get interface MTU on
'brbond0-1209': No such device
It mixes bridge/bond... How did you configure it? Can you post agent.properties
and/or explain a bit about the setup you are using?
Regards,
Moving this to dev, Mike. Probably more understanding of the matter
available there.
I don't understand the periode between 2015-05-08 09:58:13,766 until
2015-05-08 09:58:14,491
All of your log from the source host is between only two of the log entries
from the destination.
Can you maybe share
Can you provide some data from the /var/log/libvirt/libvirtd log, and also your
network configuration for both hosts? Also the contents of
/etc/cloudstack/agent.properties would be useful.
- Si
From: Mike C mcrosson_cloudst...@nusku.net
Sent: Friday,
Please help review the following draft and advise some quotes: (I hope at least
Sebastien can share his quotes as our project VP)
# START
Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large
networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable
Yes it deploys instances, not hypervisors.
And yes, it doesn't work on basic zones, but the basic framework is
there, so it's probably extensible to make Basic zones work; just no
one has scratched that itch yet.
There were some folks talking about doing work in that area, but not
sure if they
Dont know if its possible,
But somewhere in the release notes we need to state something along the
lines of. Can anyone please help?
If you are experiencing CloudStack UI issues, please consider upgrading
your tomcat instance to version 6.0.43 (tested version, but earlier
versions prior to
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/pull/3#issuecomment-100216963
LGTM. Thanks for the patch @miurahr merging now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/pull/3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
On 08-May-2015, at 2:05 pm, anil lakineni anilkumar459.lakin...@gmail.com
wrote:
and this Secondary Storage path is mounting and working with all other
servers except with SSVM.. Getting error mount.nfs: access denied by
server while mounting xx.xx.xx.xx:/
Check your nfs exports file
While you guys fix it, can you also post the link to wiki or documentation on
it ?
On 08-May-2015, at 1:45 pm, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Dakshesh,
It seems no change in analysis. Is it like it has not hit the schedule yet
and so is the reason? Right now, it
Hello,
I'm playing with The Foreman these days and promises a lot. Ideally I'd like to
use ACS as a Foreman provider (ie Foreman should be able to provision ACS
instances), but I have found nothing about this in my searches.
Is anyone doing anything with Foreman and Cloudstack?
Lucian
--
Sent
Hello everybody,
It seems that we can't create multiple Guest Networks with same VLAN ID in
the same zone on different Physical Networks.
I get this message then I try:
There is a isolated/shared network with vlan id: VLAN ID already exists in
zone Zone ID
Is it a bug?
I use CloudStack
Thanks for answers.
So can we say that VMware nsx-vsphere is not compatible with CloudStack?
Regards
- Original Message -
From: Remi Bergsma rberg...@schubergphilis.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: VMware NSX
Yes, its a bug. We had added that feature and it was working in 4.1+, but
apparently there is a regression. There's no reason the same VLAN ids can't
be reused on different physical networks
On May 8, 2015 10:29 PM, Alireza Eskandari
astro.alir...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote:
Hello everybody,
It
Please keep us posted, i'm in the same shoes, once time allow will try
it out - for now, i'm time crunched with $dayjob..
On 5/7/15 11:34 PM, Erik Weber wrote:
Just discovered this, which seems like a possible diamond,
http://capgemini.github.io/devops/apollo/
I'll be trying to find some
Hi All,
I have a strange issue that our secondary storage (NFS) is not mounting
with SSVM while before it was worked with SSVM.
Cloud-Stack version is 4.3.1
Xen Server version is 6.2.0
and this Secondary Storage path is mounting and working with all other
servers except with SSVM.. Getting
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found
with Coverity Scan.
300 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan.
70 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the
recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
New
Can you confirm that those bridges and bond devices exist prior to
attempting migration, and that the VMs are attached to them and work?
Perhaps a 'brctl show' and 'virsh dumpxml'. Those look like they should be
cloudstack-generated guest network bridges and libvirt is complaining they
don't exist
Hi,
We have resolved the issue.
The build has been analyzed successfully.
You should now be able to view defects.
Thanks
Dakshesh Vyas € Marketing Operations / Technical Manager-Coverity Scan
dv...@coverity.com mailto:jdo...@coverity.com
Office: +1 (415) 935 2957
www.coverity.com
On 2015-05-08 15:18, Remi Bergsma wrote:
It mixes bridge/bond... How did you configure it? Can you post
agent.properties and/or explain a bit about the setup you are using?
I've included a rough overview of my Ubuntu 14.04 network config(s)
below. I followed the standard conventions in the
50 matches
Mail list logo
