[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add lsb-release dependency to mgmt server...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1412#issuecomment-183277819 LGTM, simple change --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add lsb-release dependency to mgmt server...

GitHub user ProjectMoon opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1412 Add lsb-release dependency to mgmt server on Debian/Ubuntu. The cloudstack-setup-management script needs the lsb_release command. This command is provided by the `lsb-release` package on

Proxied management UI no longer opens the virtual console

Hi, I'm proxying the cloudstack UI via apache+mod_ssl (easiest way to get ssl working) with these options: LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so LoadModule proxy_ajp_module modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so ProxyPass /client ajp://localhost:20400/client ProxyPassReverse /client

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9012 :automation of cores feat...

Github user NuxRo commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1011#discussion_r52766006 --- Diff: tools/marvin/marvin/config/test_data.py --- @@ -784,6 +784,18 @@ "format": "OVA", "ispublic": "true" }, +

Re: Proxied management UI no longer opens the virtual console

Ok, ignore. It's just me being stupid. Firefox (Chrome too) decided I should not be able to access http content linked from a https page ... -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Nux!" > To: "dev"

Re: [Propose][New Feature] Storage Snapshots

> Situation: Global setting value is changed to a non-default value. > > 2) Action: Volume snapshot is taken with managed storage. Result: ??? I'm > not sure which scenario we're looking at here now. > In this situation, volume snapshots will end up on secondary storage and the snapshot on the

Re: [Propose][New Feature] Storage Snapshots

I think so. Just to confirm: The default behavior for a volume snapshot with managed storage is equivalent to a storage snapshot. When the global setting value is changed, the data ends up on secondary storage (NFS). Is that accurate? On Friday, February 12, 2016, Syed Mushtaq

Re: [Propose][New Feature] Storage Snapshots

Correct. Keeping the snapshot on managed storage should be the default behaviour as it will not break backward compatibility. -Syed On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > I think so. > > Just to confirm: The default behavior for a volume

Re: [Propose][New Feature] Storage Snapshots

OK, then - perfect. I agree with this approach. Global setting's value for volume snapshots on managed storage: Default value: Volume snapshot on managed storage = storage snapshot Non-default value: Take snapshot on primary storage, but move it to NFS. On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Syed

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9012 :automation of cores feat...

Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1011#discussion_r52769282 --- Diff: tools/marvin/marvin/config/test_data.py --- @@ -784,6 +784,18 @@ "format": "OVA", "ispublic": "true" },

Re: [Propose][New Feature] Storage Snapshots

I agree with Mike's concern about backward compatibility. We can add a global flag which makes sure that the way volume snapshots work currently on managed storage (stay on the device) is retained after upgrade. We can then safely implement the Storage Snapshot API while making the Volume Snpashot

Re: [Propose][New Feature] Storage Snapshots

Hi Syed, Can you clarify how you see these behaviors (below) working now that we are considering a global settings value applicable to managed storage with volume snapshots? State: Global setting value defaults to keep snapshot on storage system (primary storage) for managed storage. 1) Action:

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3221

See -- [...truncated 824 lines...] at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:155) at