[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1602: CLOUDSTACK-9422: Granular 'vmware.create.full.clone'...

Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602 @syed. The default behavior won't change. The proposed enhancement will add an ability to control link/full clone deployment of a primary storage level. If it is not defined there a current

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1600: Support Backup of Snapshots for Managed Storage

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600 My mistake. I forgot that I added that a while ago. :) On Jul 4, 2016, at 12:40 PM, Syed Mushtaq Ahmed > wrote:

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1602: CLOUDSTACK-9422: Granular 'vmware.create.full...

Github user syed commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602#discussion_r69486019 --- Diff: engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/VolumeOrchestrator.java --- @@ -1353,6 +1363,20 @@ public void

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1602: CLOUDSTACK-9422: Granular 'vmware.create.full...

Github user syed commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602#discussion_r69485338 --- Diff: engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/VolumeOrchestrator.java --- @@ -1353,6 +1363,20 @@ public void

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1600: Support Backup of Snapshots for Managed Storage

Github user syed commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600 @mike-tutkowski , the list snapshot already returns the `loacationType`. I think you've already added that. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

Re: [PROPOSAL] 2016-2017 Release Cycle and Calendar

I think 4.9 brings some new features, enhancements and improvements that people would appreciate in a LTS release. Many of them cannot be simply backported and 2 weeks will be far shorter to identify, backport and regression-test all those changes. From my personal experience, I've done a lot

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1602: CLOUDSTACK-9422: Granular 'vmware.create.full.clone'...

Github user nvazquez commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602 @syed adding to use cases that @serg38 mentioned, I edited PR's title which could be confusing --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1602: CLOUDSTACK-9422: Granular VMware vms creation as ful...

Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602 @syed. On Vmware using link cloned was a default behavior. The primary use cases are: - storage saving if underlying arrays don't support deduplication - speed of the deployment if

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1600: Support Backup of Snapshots for Managed Storage

Github user syed commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600 A bit of background on how this feature works. When locationType is specified as `Archve`, a snaphsot is taken at the storage, but the copy to seconday storage is done via the hypervisor as it is

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1602: CLOUDSTACK-9422: Granular VMware vms creation as ful...

Github user syed commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602 @nvazquez is there a use case where you would want some VMWare hypervisors to not do a full clone? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

Re: [PROPOSAL] 2016-2017 Release Cycle and Calendar

> Op 4 juli 2016 om 6:57 schreef John Burwell : > > > All, > > Following up on a our discussions about LTS [1], post 4.9 releases [2], and > 5.0.0/6.0.0 [3], I have assembled a release plan for the next 18-20 months in > the wiki [4]. My original proposal assumed

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1601: CLOUDSTACK-9348: Reduce Nio selector wait time

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1601 @glennwagner can you also comment if you saw any unusual CPU usage? thanks for testing this --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1575: systemvm - Python code cleanup

Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1575 #1547 has been merged, so this no longer does. Maybe you want to send a new PR and close this one? Sorry for the conflicts though! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1601: CLOUDSTACK-9348: Reduce Nio selector wait time

Github user glennwagner commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1601 LGTM Testing 4.9 master with pr 1601 1. Original results without PR KVM hosts failing to add , error in logs were NIO connection errors 2. After the PR was