Re: [Feature Request] VM Snapshot based on KVM+Ceph

> Op 9 jul. 2016 om 20:48 heeft Lv Haijiao het volgende > geschreven: > > Hi, Developers > > We deployed ACS+KVM+Ceph in our environment. Everything looks fine except > the VM snapshot feature (not volume backup) is missing in current ACS > version. > You mean you

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1608: Cleanup RBD contexts after exceptions to prev...

Github user leprechau closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1608: Cleanup RBD contexts after exceptions to prev...

GitHub user leprechau reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608 Cleanup RBD contexts after exceptions to prevent potential agent crash We noticed that when an exception occurs within the cleanup loop inside the deletePhysicalDisk routine that the

[Feature Request] VM Snapshot based on KVM+Ceph

Hi, Developers We deployed ACS+KVM+Ceph in our environment. Everything looks fine except the VM snapshot feature (not volume backup) is missing in current ACS version. Seems OpenStack can be in cooperation with Ceph well with VM snapshot enabled, wondoering if we can have this on the roadmap

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

will get back to you.. On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > Milamber, can you describe the steps to reproduce this? > > Sanjeev, would you mind reviewing this and give some guidance as to what > could be the issue? > > Thanks, > > *Will STEVENS* > Lead

[Feature Request] VM Snapshot based on KVM+Ceph

Hi, Developers We deployed ACS+KVM+Ceph in our environment. Everything looks fine except the VM snapshot feature (not volume backup) is missing in current ACS version which seems only supported by XenServer/ESXi. Wondering if we can have this on the roadmap as well. @Wido, do you have

Re: VMware compatibility

Hi Will/Rohit, Cloudstack was supporting addition of VMware vCenter 6.0 datacenter (and ESXi 6.0 hosts in it) to the Zone since the merge of PR , which fixed the underlying issues. The current VMware API build version is 6.0 and the SDK points to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

On 09/07/2016 04:48, Will Stevens wrote: Milamber, so that problem seems to be resolved? Yes the build is ok now. Let me know how the rest of your testing goes. Thanks. :) I will run my tests today and send the results (and vote) *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud

Re: VMware compatibility

Hi Will, Yes while we don't have VMware 6.0 official listed as a supported hypervisor, I've reports from some users who have claim that it works for them in their environment. We have not confirmed that it works for all major environment permutations (basic zone with/without SG, with/without

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

I am +1 based on having successfully run the following tests: TestVolumes.py (once using newly introduced XenSever SR-resigning logic and once without doing so) TestSnapshots.py TestVMSnapshots.py TestAddRemoveHosts.py Test Details: TestVolumes (using XenServer SR-resigning logic):

Re: Trillian.

Paul, Thanks for pushing hard on getting Trillian GA. We've lately became vmware allergic :( Hoping KVM would be on the roadmap soon. Thanks ilya On 7/8/16 7:38 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > I can answer this for you. No, it does not support KVM as the base > hypervisor. This was a design