Hi Rohit,
As it turned out ACS 4.9 is fine and issue is only in ACP/CCP 4.7 which I
believe is pretty close to ACS 4.7. Interestingly enough if I copy console URL
and open a tab in main Chrome window it works just fine. I took 3 more
screenshots of Chrome Development tools to compare. It looks
Hi,all
we constructed a advance network in cloudstack , it work fine early , but when
I added some VR rules ,it execute slow more and more.
About total 100 rules already exist , I add a port forward rule , it would
execute about 3 minutes , that we changed the agent source set more seconds
Hi,all
we constructed a advance network in cloudstack , it work fine early , but when
I added some VR rules ,it execute slow more and more.
About total 100 rules already exist , I add a port forward rule , it would
execute about 3 minutes , that we changed the agent source set more seconds
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@jburwell Have we as a community defined what a test review must encompass?
Is there a set of particular tests that must generally be run for each PR?
---
If your project is set up for
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@mike-tukowski any committer may merge a PR with at least one code review
LGTM, at least one test LGTM, and no -1s. For this PR, I don't see a test LGTM
with test results. Until it has at
That would be great. I think adding the ability hide GUI elements based on role
inside the GUI would be a great step.
Regards,
Marty Godsey
-Original Message-
From: Rashmi Dixit [mailto:rashmi_di...@accelerite.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 8:15 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Thank you Will. I will look at this now.
Regards,
Marty Godsey
-Original Message-
From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Will Stevens
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 5:21 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Editable Documentation
Marty,
I see. Thank you Simon. I also just received the email from Will. Let me see
what I can do. I appreciate all the help. If any of the developers are ever in
Lexington KY let me know.. Beers are on me.
Regards,
Marty Godsey
-Original Message-
From: Simon Weller [mailto:swel...@ena.com]
Marty, here are the docs:
https://github.com/apache?utf8=%E2%9C%93=cloudstack
As you can see there are quite a few different locations. If you send me a
link to the docs you are referring to, I can point you towards which repo
it is built from.
The docs are built as static websites from the
Marty,
I think Will is asking what ACS docs you are wanting in an editable format.
- Si
From: Marty Godsey
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 4:11 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Editable Documentation
Yes,,, however I would
Yes,,, however I would like to add branding.
Regards,
Marty Godsey
-Original Message-
From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Will Stevens
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 5:08 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Editable Documentation
can
can you link to the documentation you are referencing?
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Marty Godsey wrote:
> Is there an
Is there an editable form of the documentation? Like a Word Doc or something? I
know I can download the HTML and go through it but was wondering if there was a
less "tedious" way.
Regards,
Marty Godsey
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Thank you both for providing your reviews and subsequent LGTMs. :)
I believe this PR is ready to be merged.
Who is responsible for doing that these days? Can I or do we
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605
Thanks @sateesh-chodapuneedi!
You've mentioned before that you will test this in your env, can you please
share your tests results?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605
LGTM ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1541
@rhtyd That's a total merge hell with all the version number conflicts in
the pom.xml files.
This PR has been open since May this year, far before 4.9 was even cut.
Can't we merge
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599
@rhtyd that explanation makes sense, and the code seems to address that
issue. Could you please amend the explanation to the commit message?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Is there any way I could be added to the list of people who can be assigned
bugs in Jira? My username is nathanejohnson .
Thanks in advance,
Nathan
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
CLOUDSTACK-9461
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Hi Stephan,
Glad it resolved your issue. When you upgrade CloudStack always make sure to
shutdown all usage servers, as sometimes if the usage server tries to add
data/entries to cloud_usage db while the upgraded mgmt server is trying to
change the schema (of any tables in cloud_usage db) you
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
@wido This is also nice for users of Ceph.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1644
@wido Nice feature for Ceph users.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1644
LGTM, tested in our lab.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
LGTM, tested in our lab.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1646
@jburwell this makes sense, I'll update the PR and also fix this on master.
Regarding 4.8 branch, I'm not sure so I'll ask @swill -- Will can you run
setnextversion.sh on 4.8 branch to say
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599
Marvin: Fix codegenerator to work with API discovery
This fixes Marvin cloudstackAPI generator to work with a live running mgmt
server's api discovery.
You can merge this pull request into a
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599
@jburwell the Travis build failed due to tearDown error in one of the tests:
=== TestName: test_listVM_by_id_as_user_vmsfromotherdomain | Status :
EXCEPTION ===
I'll re-kick it. The
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599
@jburwell yes, this PR does not implement API-discovery based generation
but rather fixes the fields that the (api discovery based) codegenerator
should produce in the generated python classes
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1646
@rhtyd we are moving to four position to version numbers to support our
recent security release change where the fourth position is used to reflect
security patch. Therefore, the (release
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599
@rhtyd Is my understanding correct that auto discovery was implemented in a
previous commit and this PR fixes an defect in that work? If so, could you
please provide a detailed explanation of
Based on the error message of not being able to find the
PremiumSecondaryStorageResource class, this seems to be the following error (#9
on this page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting):
SSVM agent not running - You see
In /var/log/cloud/cloud.out, I see the following repeated over and over again
(below).
I'm running version 4.10.0 of the management server (but the implementation
version of the agent looks to be 4.9.0). I do have systemvm-4.10.0-SNAPSHOT.iso
accessible at /export/secondary/systemvm
Thanks for the comments, Simon.
I went ahead and tried to telnet into 8250 on my management server (first from
the SSVM and then from another machine). In both cases, this was the result:
telnet 192.168.129.50 8250
Trying 192.168.129.50...
Connected to 192.168.129.50.
Escape character is '^]'.
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599
The code seams to make sense. I like the idea of api auto-discovery so
it's a LGTM I guest.
I'm a bit out of context on this one but if it's usefull lets merge it.
Cheers,
---
Mike,
I wonder whether this could be related to the NIO connection improvements. We
saw this type of problem quite a bit when we were testing it (with all types of
agents). Typically you'll see the agent logs indicating they can't connect to
the management server if this is the case. Try
Hi Rohit,
thanks!
Having a recent DB backup at hand and only based on guesses, I did some
further experiments yesterday :)
- Rerun /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/util/migrate-
dynamicroles.py
- Checked cloudstack-usage 4.8.0.1 instead of 4.9
- Updated back to cloudstack-usage 4.9
... and
Hi Marty,
We could add an "actionPreFilter" for "actions" defined in the widgets which
will filter out the buttons based on role.
There are preFilters already implemented for fields in a listView - we need to
follow the same principle. We need to check for this filter where the buttons
are
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1646
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1646
Job ID-90
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1541
@wido can you reopen or edit the PR for base branch 4.9? Let's get this
merged, as we'll need to support Ubuntu 16.04 for our LTS release.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511
rebased against latest master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599
Pinging for review -- @karuturi @jburwell @koushik-das @swill @pdion891 and
others. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1646
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1646
[4.9/LTS] Add upgrade path from 4.9.0 to 4.9.1
This adds db upgrade path from 4.9.0 to 4.9.1 and fixes a typo in default
user role description (CLOUDSTACK-9449)
/cc @karuturi @jburwell
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1629
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1634
@karuturi @jburwell can we merge this, this is only packaging related fix.
Using above packages, installation confirmed that argparse was installed on
el6/el7 kvm hosts.
---
If your project is
Hi Marty, Will,
I've heard about such a request before. Due to our legacy UI, there is no way
to use api-discovery for a logged in user (based on their role etc.) to
enable/disable UI elements such as buttons, views etc. Though a specific
element may be hidden or displayed based on custom
Hi Stephan,
In cloud_usage.account `role_id` can be NULL as there is no user of this field
within the usage server. In cloud.account, the `role_id` should be
automatically populated/migrated when you upgraded. From your shared db query
result, I'm not sure if that's a select query on
Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
I understand your point of the release, but we're not in an ideal world
where everyone runs the latest version. I try to do my best to look at the
current code in CS to find possible fixes
Hi Sergey,
Can you open console in Chrome and then click on Tools-> Developer Tools. It
would open a separate window from where you can debug what's going wrong. In
the developer tools window, head over to the console tab and share if you're
seeing any errors. Head over to the network tab,
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
Please use a proper ACS release for reporting bugs. In your case you may
have to do some additional cherry-picks.
"Schedule restart" does multiple tasks. There is a method by this
role_id in account table shouldn't be null. If the upgrade was
successful, it should have updated it with proper mapping from
account type. (check the db upgrade log for any exceptions)
I suggest you do the update manually following the logic at
Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
@koushik-das We are running a fork based on 4.4.2 with lots of
cherry-pickings.
But even if the host is down, why would you want to schedule a restart if
the VM are not HA enabled?
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
@marcaurele Based on the initial few lines of the logs the agent went to
Alert state.
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,895 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
> Would you mind adding these notes to the bug ticket?
@jburwell All PR comments are going automatically into the jira ticket
comment thanks to the ID matching (I think).
---
If
Github user marcaurele commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640#discussion_r75252604
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/ha/HighAvailabilityManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -497,7 +498,7 @@ protected Long restart(final HaWorkVO work) {
57 matches
Mail list logo