Re: CentOS 7 is reaching EOL

Yes, I understood, that's what I was addressing. :) On 2024-01-23 23:03, Wei ZHOU wrote: Hi Lucian, I think what Vishesh meant is removing the support of CentOS 7 as a management server or kvm host. -Wei On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 22:07, Nux wrote: I would not be so hasty. I am sure there are

Re: [PROPOSAL] version naming : drop the 4.

Yes, the ubuntu version naming is the best in my opinion. Other than the version naming, we need to decide the frequency of major releases and minor releases, which version will be LTS, how long the LTS/normal version will be supported, etc. Maybe a vote in the dev/users/pmc mailing list? 在

Re: CentOS 7 is reaching EOL

Hi Lucian, I think what Vishesh meant is removing the support of CentOS 7 as a management server or kvm host. -Wei On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 22:07, Nux wrote: > I would not be so hasty. I am sure there are still CentOS 5 instances in > existence somewhere, similarly I think CentOS 7 will not go

Re: [PROPOSAL] version naming : drop the 4.

I like this idea as well, even if its .MM or YY.MM. Would we want to define delivery months for releases similar to Ubuntu .04 and .10? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Nux Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 6:11 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Wei ZHOU

Re: [PROPOSAL] version naming : drop the 4.

An interesting proposition, I like it. It would also relieve us from having to come up with any over-the-top feature or change for a major version change. On 2024-01-23 14:49, Wido den Hollander wrote: We could look at Ubuntu, and other projects, and call it 2025.01 if we release it in Jan

Re: CentOS 7 is reaching EOL

I would not be so hasty. I am sure there are still CentOS 5 instances in existence somewhere, similarly I think CentOS 7 will not go down without a fight. I'm not saying to never kill support for it, but I'd leave it maybe 1-2 more releases. Corporate users especially will take a lot of time to

[PR] Fixup drs docs [cloudstack-documentation]

vishesh92 opened a new pull request, #376: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/376 cc: @andrijapanicsb -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

CentOS 7 is reaching EOL

Hi all While working on a PR[1] to upgrade JRE, I noticed that CentOS 7 is reaching end of life on 30 June, 2024 [2]. Should we remove support for CentOS 7 after 4.19 is released? Because by the time 4.20 is out, CentOS 7 would already have reached its EOL and IMO it doesn't make sense to

Re: Apache CloudStack and Ceph Day - February 22, Amsterdam

Looking forward to it! See you there. On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 3:03 PM Daan Hoogland wrote: > I live in his backyard, will there as well. > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 3:58 PM Wido den Hollander > wrote: > > > > > > > > Op 09/01/2024 om 13:45 schreef Ivet Petrova: > > > Dear community members, > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] version naming : drop the 4.

Op 22/01/2024 om 12:17 schreef Wei ZHOU: +1 with 20.0 5.0 sounds like a leap with lots of significant changes. Unfortunately it has not been discussed what needs to be done. 20.0 (or 24.0) looks better. We could look at Ubuntu, and other projects, and call it 2025.01 if we release it in

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC3

Thanks Abhishek and all involved for your hard work - it's not uncommon to create multiple RCs for a major .0 release - hope to get there with the next one. Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 18:55 To: users ;

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC3

Hi all, We have found an issue with RC3 which would cause regression for UEFI functionality on KVM hosts and VM deployment. We already have a pull request to fix it, https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8547 I'll work with contributors and cut a new RC with this fix. Regards, Abhishek On

Re: new website design

+1 overall, but there are a few things I would consider blockers: 1. the blog page doesn't look same as on current blog (prod). https://cloudstack.staged.apache.org/blog (staging blog) versus https://cloudstack.apache.org/blog/ (current blog/prod.) If we can fix the blog listing and the

Re: Setup Linstor Plugin for ACS

Hi, I got my rough notes here; https://gist.github.com/rohityadavcloud/7844bfa8cbc9586408ce3596c71caa50 And there is a guide here - https://linbit.com/drbd-user-guide/linstor-guide-1_0-en Regards.