Yes, the main bug here is not updating the Total Capacity - this is avoiding
the total getting updated on host reconnects.
Bug with the Used and Reserved Capacities gets masked since CapacityManager
also listens to the VM state changes and updates these values.
Prachi
-Original Message-
Darren,
Thanks for the feedback and agreed that to make the RBAC solution pluggable, we
would need to model it using standard authorization entities. As Min mentioned,
this branch is to experiment how closely we can add a true RBAC model to
current CloudStack code having account-domain hierarch
I think commands.properties is not just providing ACL on the API - but it also
serves as a whitelist of APIs available on the deployment.
It can be a one-step configuration option to disable certain functionality.
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph..
I see it on Windows too.
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 4:20 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Min Chen
Subject: Re: Global setting "host" is not set to MS IP anymore on master
Importance: High
I'm facing
Koushik,
The deployment planning process is divided between DeploymentPlanners and
Allocators. The planners are supposed to feed a list of clusters the allocators
should look into to find a potential destination. While the allocators should
provide a avoid set back to the planners consisting of
ut if cluster can be avoided by
considering applicable pools only.
Does this work fine for your scenario?
On 15-Oct-2013, at 11:31 PM, Prachi Damle
wrote:
> Koushik,
>
> The deployment planning process is divided between DeploymentPlanners and
> Allocators. The planners are suppos
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:21 AM
To:
Subject: Re: Possible bug in DeploymentPlanner?
On 16-Oct-2013, at 3:12 AM, Prachi Damle wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailt
}
}
-Koushik
On 17-Oct-2013, at 3:21 AM, Prachi Damle
mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com>> wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com<http://citrix.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:21 AM
To: mailto:dev@
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 11:50 AM
To:
Subject: Re: Possible bug in DeploymentPlanner?
On 17-Oct-2013, at 11:29 PM, Prachi Damle
wrote:
> Koushik,
>
> I don't think you should add this check
Congrats Animesh!
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 1:09 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats Animesh.
On 21/10/13 12:51 PM, "La Motta, David" wrote:
>Awe
Yes, either moving the line to constructor or using a local SearchBuilder will
fix it - however the S3 APIs part in awsapi project is not supported or updated
for a long time and may have many other issues to get it working.
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darre
, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Yes, either moving the line to constructor or using a local SearchBuilder
> will fix it - however the S3 APIs part in awsapi project is not supported or
> updated for a long time and may have many other issues to get it working.
>
>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 1:36 PM
To: Prachi Damle; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Tags on storagePool
I came across a potential bug in the way allocators do volumes placement on
storage, based on storage tags. Prachi, can you please confirm if the bug is
real.
The tags ar
I had encountered this sometime back ... you need to check if your
componentContext.xml or its equivalent has following defined. However I do see
it is present in the 4.2 branch
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, O
rver.handle(Server.java:326)
> >> at
> >> org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:542)
> >> at
> >>
> org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.content(HttpConnection
> .jav
> >> a:945)
> >>
Hi,
Before the Spring modularization, we have some usecases that were using the
com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentContext class directly to inject or to find
a bean of given type or name by invoking ComponentContext :: getComponent().
How should these usecases be ported now after the modulariz
ren
> On Nov 5, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Prachi Damle wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Before the Spring modularization, we have some usecases that were using the
> com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentContext class directly to inject or to
> find a bean of given type or name by invoking
already have a list of AffinityGroupProcessors
injected to the class. Can't you just loop through those?
Darren
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Thanks Darren, it is the listAffinityGroupTypes API, specific code is in
> AffinityGroupServiceImpl :: listAffinit
But in general, is there a way to get hold of a particular bean by name or type?
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 1:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: ComponentContext :: getComponent() ?
I used to call getComponent() to get the
the APIs are exposing accoutnID as an input parameter. CS
has the convention of always using the pair domainId+ accountName to pass
account information and never expose the accountId.
- Please change the APIs to not take in accountID directly.
- Prachi Damle
On May 2, 2013, 2:53 p.m., deepti
an updated
patch.
- Prachi Damle
On May 2, 2013, 2:53 p.m., deepti dohare wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
lines:
- dedicate a host to a test account
- create the explicit dedication affinity group for the test account
- deploy Vm using explicit dedication affinity group
- make sure that the hostId of the running VM is the dedicated host.
- Prachi Damle
On May 2, 2013, 2:53 p.m., deepti dohare wrote
I am looking into CLOUDSTACK-2568
Thanks,
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 1:04 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS41] Outstanding Blockers - Please Read!
Here's where we are. Help resolving or actual
Thank Ove, I am looking at it. Will update the ticket soon.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Ove Ewerlid [mailto:ove.ewer...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:50 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Prachi Damle
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Outstanding Blockers - Please Read!
On 05/21
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 12:49 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Outstanding Blockers - Please Read!
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:51:29PM +0000, Prachi Damle wrote:
> I am looking into CLOUDSTACK-2568
Thank you Prachi!
ing
---
Manual testing done, also the fix has been already verified on a test
environment by the bug reporter.
Thanks,
Prachi Damle
s of other accounts are
running on that host/cluster/pod/zone. If yes, dedication should fail.
- Prachi Damle
On May 2, 2013, 2:53 p.m., deepti dohare wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To re
Congratulations Sangeetha!!
-Original Message-
From: Sowmya Krishnan [mailto:sowmya.krish...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 12:22 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan
Congratulations Sangeetha!
> -Original Message-
>
ods - refer the listServiceOffering API to see this
pattern
- Prachi Damle
On May 24, 2013, 7:30 p.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https:/
actual
planner logic. We should make both consistent.
- Prachi Damle
On May 29, 2013, 10:16 a.m., Rajesh Battala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
,
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 6:55 AM
To: CloudStack Dev; Prachi Damle
Subject: Re: Renaming updateVMAffinityGroup -> updateAffinityGroup
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:28:20AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>
-> updateAffinityGroup
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:59:40PM +0000, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Hi Prasanna,
> deleteAffinityGroup API should not take the VM Id parameter - I have
> updated the FS. This API is supposed to disassociate all VMs from the
> group and delete the affinity group entity in the
.
- Prachi Damle
On May 28, 2013, 1:05 p.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11380/#review21179
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Prachi Damle
On May 28, 2013, 1:07 p.m
013 9:48 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Prachi Damle
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:23:31AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> I think we need to add an 'mvn clean' to the cloud.spec prior to
> building. Normally, I
dependency: expected at least 1 bean which qualifies as autowire candidate
for this dependency. Dependency annotations: {@javax.inject.Inject()}
- Prachi Damle
On May 30, 2013, 4:39 p.m., Rajesh Battala wrote:
>
> ---
> This
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11510/#review21243
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Prachi Damle
On May 31, 2013, 2:51 a.m
Shane,
Can you share the management server log file?
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Shane Witbeck [mailto:sh...@digitalsanctum.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 9:18 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: tests involving deploying a vm fail
Hi all,
I'm attempting to run the foll
Hi Pouya,
All of CloudStack's RA heuristics are applied by deployment planner modules and
host/storagepool allocators to decide the order in which
resource(pods,clusters,hosts,storage pools) will be considered for a VM
deployment/migration.
Following are the existing flavors of these modules:
Hey Maurice,
You should check logs prior to this error, that will show the real problem
causing CS to put the host in avoid set.
-Prachi
From: Maurice Lawler [mailto:maurice.law...@me.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 12:40 PM
To: Cloud Dev
Subject: Console Proxy VM failed to start
Hello,
I
Yes seeing this issue too.
Checked the code and looks like a regression due to the following commit.
---
Author: Bharat Kumar (bharat.ku...@citrix.com)
Author date:2 days ago (Wed Jun 26 20:55:30 2013 +0530)
Commit hash:7f2f25d640b47c8e72381bfc318a71ca2bfd
Cloudstack-21
?
Pl do revert if it doesn't cause other issues.
-Original Message-----
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 1:44 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: On master updatephysicalnetwork won't enable the phy. net?
Yes seeing
then we will let the planners figure out
the pools to use for deployment always, so passing the poolId null for now.
- Prachi Damle
On June 30, 2013, 5:52 a.m., Dave Brosius wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e
Hi Prasanna,
For the following two test failures:
-
integration.smoke.test_affinity_groups.TestDeployVmWithAffinityGroup.test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup
It looks to be some issue with the test itself. The test is failing to find
the affinity group created duri
+ 1
Please upload the code template for reference.
-Original Message-
From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 5:08 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Coding Convention Reminder
We'd better export the code template from Eclipse, then everybody
Maurice,
You should check the logs before this exception trace is logged, just follow
the consoleproxy-1 thread to see what went wrong in the deployment process.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 6:59 AM
To: dev
Currently for storage allocators, only random or firstfit or user-dispersing
strategies are present. This is governed by the 'vm.allocation.algorithm'
global config.
So for you case with storage tags, if you choose random, either of the pools
can get chosen. For firstfit, you will mostly see one
en you say "random," does that mean random among the storage pools that
have, say, the necessary storage tag or does random ignore storage tags?
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
wrote:
> OK, thanks!
>
>
> On Wed,
Code for S3 API is lying under awsapi project. Only EC2 API under awsapi is
functionally tested.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:40 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Prachi Damle
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] What other "features" or code
ll not be referred in this case.
Prachi
From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 1:39 PM
To: Mike Tutkowski; Prachi Damle
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Another ISO Question
Let me defer to +Prachi, she knows the tagging system better than I.
On Th
Good work Pranav! All the best for your future.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:psb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:09 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org;
market...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Thank you Apache community
Account and domainId are not required parameters of this API. It works fine
with just an id too.
Account and domain will be used if delete is called providing a name of the
group instead of id, say by an admin for a regular user's group.
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mai
, 2013 at 02:17:46PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 07:14:42AM +, Prachi Damle wrote:
> > Account and domainId are not required parameters of this API. It
> > works fine with just an id too.
> >
> > Account and domain will be used if delete
Prasanna does the regression test scripts call using 8096 port?
If yes then that's the reason why the API is failing.
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 4:13 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Prachi Damle; Alex Huang
Subject: Re: deleteAffinityGroup API
If the API
This code is generic to all APIs - not just for deleteAffinity API.
Alena do you know why does accountmanager deny access to system user?
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 4:39 PM
To: Prachi Damle; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE
from
test/integration/component/. That's how I repro-ed the issue.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:14:19PM +0000, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Prasanna does the regression test scripts call using 8096 port?
>
> If yes then that's the reason why the API is failing.
>
> From: Alen
I cannot reproduce this using latest 4.2. Updated the bug with details of tests.
Is this only seen when using automation tests?
Prachi
From: Girish Shilamkar [mailto:gir...@clogeny.com]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 12:04 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Prachi Damle
Cc: Prasanna Santhanam
Hi,
Seems like the awsapi installation is broken for 4.1 and 4.1.1 releases. Most
of the issues have been identified and fixed in 4.2.
Here is the list to start with:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2777
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3295
https://issues.apache
Congratulations Vijay! Well deserved!
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 10:01 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
:208507a42a4db252dc3d7cf299c146315423a071
Contained in branches: 4.2-forward
Contained in no tag
- Prachi Damle
On Aug. 26, 2013, 8:02 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
Hi Animesh,
Can you cherry-pick the following patch to 4.2:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13804/
Commit hash: 208507a42a4db252dc3d7cf299c146315423a071
Contained in branches: 4.2-forward
Thanks,
Prachi
Hi Animesh,
Can you cherry-pick the following fix to 4.2:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4528
Commit b24e9a6dd5281b2163ce088e6f5b1fa730c33f7d
Commit 52f4683099e03e16916dfdf741f2d5544491aaad
Contained in branch refs/heads/4.2-forward
Thanks,
Prachi
Yes I will be
Thanks,
Prachi
From: Animesh Chaturvedi
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 4:11 PM
To: Prachi Damle
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ACS42] Cherry pick CLOUDSTACK-4528
Can you put the patch into master as well?
From: Prachi Damle
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 4:03 PM
:6354604eedff0c5f4ddef4940ce02df80adb656c
- Prachi Damle
On Aug. 30, 2013, 4:38 p.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
Hi,
Can you check if you have set storage tags on the service offering instead of
the host tags? You can call listServiceOfferings API and check the response
corresponding to your service offering.
The field ' hosttags' is set or is the field ' tags' set?
-Prachi
-Original Message-
F
I think that ServiceOfferings are not tied to a specific zone, so they will be
globally available.
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 6:59 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: serviceofferings per zone
Hi,
I am looki
Congratulations Ahmad!!
-Original Message-
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 10:08 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Ahmad Emneina
Subject: RE: New committer: Ahmad Emneina
Yey! Hearty Congratulations, Ahmad!!
> On 3/24/13 4
adeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 2:12 PM
To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Manan Shah; Alex Huang
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules
On 3/1/13 7:14 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:18:51PM -0800, Prachi
will
wipe out the existing group associations of the VM and create the new
associations.
If you do not include some existing affinity group in this API call, it will
get removed.
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, Apr
should also include the list of affinity group it is
associated with.
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 11:27 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS
This is amazing!!! Reduced build time for me, from 6:45.917s to 1:28.435s
Thanks Edison!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Edison Su wrote:
> As a poor man, don't have luxury build machine as Alex has, I find a
> way may help you a little bit to build cloudstack as quick as possible:
> mvn -pl
to master
On 6 April 2013 05:56, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I would like to merge the Affinity/Anti-Affinity feature developed in
> affinity_groups branch to master.
>
>
>
> - Functional Specs for this feature can be found here:
> https://cw
Hi Sangeetha,
The test plan looks fine. A few comments
1) UpdateVMAffinityGroup API - We should add to the testcases, the scenario
where an already existing VM say on host1, is updated to have affinity group
A1 that asks to avoid host1.
In this case, the VM cannot restart on host1, but should
live migrating.
>> Vm migration in such cases will succeed. But when Vms are stopped and
>> started , it will fail to start since the anti-affinity group check will
>> fail ?
-Thanks
Sangeetha
Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@ci
If you are seeing the tags honored sometimes then I guess this might be related
to ordering of allocators.
Kelven, is your fix to maintain the order in which allocators are loaded, in
4.1 as well?
Prachi
On Apr 8, 2013, at 6:45 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
wrote:
> Yeah, that dawned on me later,
M, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
>> Could it just be that it occasionally chooses the right storage by chance?
>> On Apr 8, 2013 8:36 PM, "Prachi Damle" wrote:
>>
>> > If you are seeing the tags honored sometimes then I guess this
>> > might be rel
n Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:56:55PM -0700, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Prasanna,
> Affinity Group Processing is a pre-planning step. It will set the
> scope for the deployment planners, there is no conflict between the
> planner strategies and affinity groups. These are separate steps of
>
Prasanna,
Actually the PRD or the FS lists some other placement planning usecases this
can facilitate:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Affinity+-+Anti-affinity+rules
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday
, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to merge the Affinity/Anti-Affinity feature developed in
> affinity_groups branch to master.
>
>
> - Functional Specs for this feature can be found here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+
I will take a look at CLOUDSTACK-1987.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 5:17 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ACS41] Help needed clearing bugs!
Probably, it's a setup issue, e.g openvswitch doesn't work
first?
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10426/
On Apr 11, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Prachi Damle wrote:
> I will take a look at CLOUDSTACK-1987.
>
> -Prachi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2
I would like to propose a new feature - DeploymentPlanner choice via
ServiceOffering
Jira ticket created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2056
This is to expose the choice of Deployment Planner via Service Offering and let
Admin use a mix of Planners in a CS deployment.
The i
s in Svc Offering, some offerings might choose
>> 'FirstFitPlanner', while some other might choose 'UserDispersingPlanner'.
>>Thus all planners can get used in the same CS deployment - since the choice
>>will no longer be global. All such planners will app
On 18/04/13 11:01 AM, "Koushik Das" wrote:
>I have some comments inline
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:17 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
FS is @
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+for+Granular+Glob
al+Configuration+Parameters. Just search for vm.allocation
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 18/04/13 12:16 AM, "Prachi Damle" wrote:
>Hi Nitin,
>
>Thanks for the feedback. I have added comments inline.
>
Congratulations Prasanna!
-Original Message-
From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 10:27 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam
Congrats Prasanna!
~Talluri
> -Original Messa
I will take a look at CLOUDSTACK-2158
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 6:55 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a
new RC for 4.1
Hi al
Looking at it.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:50 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed!
CLOUDSTACK-2158 is a blocker bug for 4.1.0, and I need an allocator expert to
It should be set by Spring by looking at the applicationContext or
componentContext
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:58 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed!
I looked
Hi,
Comments Inline.
Thanks,
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: MEHDI ALI SOLTANI [mailto:mehdi_alisolt...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:34 AM
To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: DISCUSS
Hi
I am new in Devcloud and I want to push my algorithm in Devcloud.
I hav
--Original Message-----
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 11:00 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed!
It should be set by Spring by looking at the applicationContext or
componentContext
-Prachi
-Origin
This will ensure that when this component is loaded by Spring, the allocators
gets initialized.
Contained in branches: master
Contained in no tag
Thanks,
Prachi
-Original Message-----
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 11:22
ources and
call it from planDeployment(), for readability.
- Can Use DAO methods to load group of type 'explicit dedication' for the VM
id, instead of loading all groups and iterating.
- Prachi Damle
On April 26, 2013, 12:48 p.m.,
I will take a look at it.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 2:07 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS41] New blocker... CLOUDSTACK-2281
CLOUDSTACK-2281 has to do with apparent deployment planner corru
Marcus,
I will need some more information to analyze this, I just commented the ticket.
Can you please let me know the details needed?
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 2:12 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
adding it!
- Prachi Damle
On April 29, 2013, 10:01 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 7:25 AM
To: CloudStack Dev
Cc: Prachi Damle
Subject: Renaming updateVMAffinityGroup -> updateAffinityGroup
Hi Prachi,
Sorry for bringing this up so late -
Since the featu
I have updated the FS with some more details regarding the design of this
feature,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/DeploymentPlanner+choice+via+ServiceOffering
Please provide any comments.
Thanks,
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da
+1! Thanks for removing the need of 3 files per test!
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 8:26 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [TIPS] Writing unit tests with Spring injection...
I made an improvement to how we write our
global config vm.deployment.planner points to
ImplicitDedicationPlanner
- Prachi Damle
On May 10, 2013, 4:09 p.m., Devdeep Singh wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
