Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

On 7/7/21 1:16 PM, Alex Mattioli wrote: > Hi all, > @Wei Zhou @Rohit > Yadav and myself are investigating how to > enable IPV6 support on Isolated and VPC networks and would like your input on > it. > At the moment we are

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

t of IPv6 is equivalent to current /24 subnet of IPv4 that created in Network. and /64  of IPv6 is equivalent to single IP of IPv4 assign to VM. On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 5:31 PM Wido den Hollander mailto:w...@widodh.nl>> wrote: Op 14-07-2021 om 16:44 schreef Hean Seng

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

ated rough schematic on how it could look on VR side: https://dice.lv/acs/ACS_router_v2.pdf On 2021/07/13 13:08:20, Wido den Hollander wrote: On 7/7/21 1:16 PM, Alex Mattioli wrote: Hi all, @Wei Zhou<mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com> @Rohit Yadav<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeb

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

use to calculate their IPv6 address (SLAAC). In drawing VR is in VPC mode how it will work for isolated network where external link/ip is not assigned initially? On 2021/07/15 14:47:24, Wido den Hollander wrote: But you still need routing. See the attached PNG (and draw.io XML). You need

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

3) End-user driven AS number on a per network basis (for bring your own AS and IP scenario) Thoughts? Cheers Alex -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander mailto:w...@widodh.nl>> Sent: 13 July 2021 15:08 To: dev@cloudstack.

Re: Root disk resizing

On 10/10/21 10:35 AM, Ranjit Jadhav wrote: > Hello folks, > > I have implemented cloudstack with Xenserver Host. The template has been > made out of VM with basic centos 7 and following package installed on it > > sudo yum -y cloud-init > sudo yum -y install

Live migration between AMD Epyc and Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04

Hi, I'm trying to debug an issue with live migrations between Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04 machines each with different CPUs: - Ubuntu 18.04 with AMD Epyc 7552 (Rome) - Ubuntu 20.04 with AMD Epyc 7662 (Milan) We are currently using this setting: guest.cpu.mode=custom guest.cpu.model=EPYC This

Re: Live migration between AMD Epyc and Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04

believe the best solution is upgrading all hosts to the same OS > version. > > -Wei > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 16:31, Wido den Hollander wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to debug an issue with live migrations between Ubuntu 18.04 >> and 20.04 machines

Re: Live migration between AMD Epyc and Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04

hat the ibpb CPU feature wasn't available when migrating to the updated OS hosts (even though identical hardware). Upgrading qemu-ev to 2.12 on the originating host, then stopping and starting the VMs, then allowed us to migrate. We couldn't find any solution that didn't involve stopping and startin

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

can always have 'floating' IPv6 addressess. Wido Option with RA and managed flag that DHCPv6 is in use to support preset information and ability to create route information from ACS is not an option as DHCPv6 its failing? On 2021/07/16 15:17:42, Wido den Hollander wrote: Op 16-07-2021 om

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

Wido den Hollander wrote: Op 16-07-2021 om 16:42 schreef Hean Seng: Hi Wido, In current setup, each Cloudstack have own VR, so in this new IPv6 subnet allocation , each VR (which have Frr) will need to have peering with ISP router (and either BGP or Static Route) , and there is 1000 Acocunts

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

- will not work as answer. I understand that as well. Wido On 2021/07/19 09:05:54, Wido den Hollander wrote: Op 16-07-2021 om 21:46 schreef Kristaps Cudars: Hi Wido, Your proposal is to sacrifice ability to reassign IPv6 to instance, have internal domain prefix, and list/db in ACS what IPv6 has

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

understand IPv6 is different then IPv4, and in IPv6 it suppose each devices have own IP. It just how to realize in easy way. On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 8:17 PM Wido den Hollander wrote: Op 16-07-2021 om 05:54 schreef Hean Seng: Hi Wido, My initial thought is not like

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

/15 15:10:38, Wido den Hollander wrote: Op 15-07-2021 om 17:05 schreef Kristaps Cudars: Hi Wido, What is benefit of using Route Advertisement on internal VR networks? The VMs need the Router Advertisement to learn their default gateway. That's the only way with IPv6. The RA also contains

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

usand static route which is not possible . On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 10:47 PM Wido den Hollander wrote: But you still need routing. See the attached PNG (and draw.io XML). You need to route the /48 subnet TO the VR which can then route it to the Virtual Networks behind the VR. There is

KVM: Out of subnet 'secondary' IPs for Virtual Machines (Anycast/floating IPs)

Hi, Use-case: I have a SG enabled shared network where a VM establishes a BGP session with the upstream router. Over this BGP session the VM announces a /32 (IPv4) and/or /128 (IPv6) address and the router now installs this route. I do the same (with the same IPs) on a few different VMs

Re: KVM: Out of subnet 'secondary' IPs for Virtual Machines (Anycast/floating IPs)

to the closest VM in the network. Let's say you would announce 8.8.8.8/32 or 2001:4860:4860::/128 from multiple VPS to create a highly available DNS server as an example. Wido just checking on your envisioned business case, not implying an answer here/yet. On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 2:37 PM Wido den

Re: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2022 - November 14-16

Sounds good! I'll do my best to be present! (And make sure there's a bar nearby! ;-) ) Wido Op 05-04-2022 om 16:57 schreef Alex Mattioli: Sounds amazing @Ivet Petrova -Original Message- From: Daman Arora Sent: 05 April 2022 16:51 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users

Re: KVM: Out of subnet 'secondary' IPs for Virtual Machines (Anycast/floating IPs)

hout it being checked. Just allow any address to be added as a secondary address. This would already be sufficient. Wido > -Wei > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 14:37, Wido den Hollander wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Use-case: I have a SG enabled shared network where a VM establis

Build in main branch failing due to SSL exception when downloading a resource

Hi, On my Ubuntu laptop I tried building the main branch and this fails: [INFO] --- download-maven-plugin:1.6.3:wget (download-checksums) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [WARNING] Ignoring download failure. [WARNING] Could not get content javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: PKIX path building

Re: [DISCUSS] New Design for the Apache CloudStack Website

Op 31-08-2023 om 11:41 schreef Rohit Yadav: Thanks Ivet, the new iterated design looks impressive especially some of the new graphical elements. +1 to moving forward with the proposed design. Let's collect any further feedback and ideas from the community and if there are no objections go

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

can then allocate /64s from that larger subnet. Wido Cheers Alex -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander Sent: 12 May 2022 16:04 To: Abhishek Kumar ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks On 5/12/22 09:55, Abhishek Kumar wrote: Hi Wido, I

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

/64s coming from a specific /56 or /48 to make things logical, but underneath it's all /64s which we need to route. Wido -Wei On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 11:30, Wido den Hollander wrote: Op 12-05-2022 om 16:10 schreef Alex Mattioli: ipv6 route fd23:313a:2f53:3cbf::/64 fd23:313a:2f53:3000:1c00

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

I do wonder what happens if you destroy the VR and create a new one. The WAN address then changes (due to SLAAC) and thus the routes need to be re-programmed. Wido > > Regards, > Abhishek > > >    > >    > > ----------

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

resses can be changed (4) an Ipv6 addresses can be re-used by multiple vms. The problem is, stateful dhcpv6 does not support routers,nameservers, etc. we need to figure it out (probably use radvd/frr and dnsmasq both). -Wei On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 at 12:19, Wido den Hollander wr

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

ult as you would then also need to do a API-call to gather that information. Wido P.S.: Who controls the DNS of qa.cloudstack.cloud? It lacks an -record for IPv6! ], "name": "routing_test" } ] } From: Wi

Re: Running the UI on Docker container

of the company and other portals. Wido hth --- Nux www.nux.ro On 2022-09-06 15:56, Wido den Hollander wrote: Hi, Anybody there running the UI outside the Management Server in a Docker container like described here? https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/main/ui I have a use-case

Running the UI on Docker container

Hi, Anybody there running the UI outside the Management Server in a Docker container like described here? https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/main/ui I have a use-case for this we would like to investigate, but the build currently fails [0]. Is this still relevant and supported?

Re: Register for the CCC - Physical Attendance

Looking forward to it! We'll join with 4 people from our company (Netherlands). Great to see the community again. Learn from and help each other and afterwards enjoy a few beers. See you all in Bulgaria! Wido On 10/26/22 12:59, Ivet Petrova wrote: Hi all, I would like to kindly ask all of

Introducing Bart and Ruben

Hi devs, Recently Bart and Ruben (CC) joined CLDIN (was PCextreme) as DevOps engineers and will be working on CloudStack and start to contribute to the project. In the coming months they'll finding their way around in the community and code and you should start seeing Pull Requests from

Re: Missing ubuntu 4.18 packages

Hi, We are aware. Those need to be build and uploaded. Wido Op 18-03-2023 om 13:39 schreef Curious Pandora: Hello, it looks like the 4.18 packages for focal/jammy/bionic are missing at download.cloudstack.org. Regards,

Re: OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2023 CFP and Registration Now Open!

Hi Ivet, Thanks for organizing this! I was just sharing this internally with our colleagues throughout Europe and I noticed that the link to the hotel is broken. The correct URL is: https://www.ihg.com/voco/hotels/gb/en/clichy/parpc/hoteldetail A few things in addition: - Is there a deal

Re: OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2023 CFP and Registration Now Open!

://events.hubilo.com/cloudstack-collaboration-conference-2023/register and that does contain the information needed. All good! Wido Kind regards, On 25 Jul 2023, at 12:01, Wido den Hollander mailto:w...@widodh.nl>> wrote: Hi, Op 24-07-2023 om 08:53 schreef Ivet Petrova: Hi All, - As Gr

Re: OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2023 CFP and Registration Now Open!

Hi Ivet, Thanks for organizing this! I was just sharing this internally with our colleagues throughout Europe and I noticed that the link to the hotel is broken. The correct URL is: https://www.ihg.com/voco/hotels/gb/en/clichy/parpc/hoteldetail A few things in addition: - Is there a deal

Re: OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2023 CFP and Registration Now Open!

arrange a beer / diner session. Maybe we can discuss this @Ivet Petrova and @Jamie Pell ? Btw, very happy to welcome the community in France next november ! Gregoire LAMODIERE Co-fondateur & Solution architect -----Message d'origine- De : Wido den Hollander mailto:w...@widodh.nl>>

Re: OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2023 CFP and Registration Now Open!

arrange a beer / diner session. Maybe we can discuss this @Ivet Petrova and @Jamie Pell ? Btw, very happy to welcome the community in France next november ! Gregoire LAMODIERE Co-fondateur & Solution architect -----Message d'origine- De : Wido den Hollander mailto:w...@widodh.nl>>

Re: [PROPOSAL] version naming : drop the 4.

: drop the 4. An interesting proposition, I like it. It would also relieve us from having to come up with any over-the-top feature or change for a major version change. On 2024-01-23 14:49, Wido den Hollander wrote: We could look at Ubuntu, and other projects, and call it 2025.01 if we release

Re: [PROPOSAL] version naming : drop the 4.

from having to come up with any over-the-top feature or change for a major version change. On 2024-01-23 14:49, Wido den Hollander wrote: We could look at Ubuntu, and other projects, and call it 2025.01 if we release it in Jan 2025. A great post on the website, mailinglists and social media could

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

+1 Op 19/02/2024 om 13:49 schreef Daan Hoogland: LS, This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be counted please reply to dev@. As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning scheme. The result would be that the next major version will be 20

Re: new website is life

Nice, very nice! Op 07/02/2024 om 09:22 schreef Daan Hoogland: People, we brought the new website. Please all have a look at https://cloudstack.apache.org thanks for any feedback

Re: New Object Storage - Huawei OBS

solve it. The module seems to load according to the mgmt server log, but I can't add the storage. Exception is the same. Wido -Wei On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 at 13:40, Wido den Hollander wrote: On 12/15/23 09:41, Ronald Feicht wrote: Hi Kishan, when I add my module to client/pom.xml I get

Re: New Object Storage - Huawei OBS

Op 14/12/2023 om 10:51 schreef Ronald Feicht: Hi, I am trying to write an Object Storage plugin for Huawei OBS using Minio as example. I added my plugin code to the plugins/storage/object/ directory, added my plugin into plugins/pom.xml and added the string 'Huawei OBS' to

Re: New Object Storage - Huawei OBS

/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) -Wei On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 at 17:18, Wido den Hollander wrote: Op 15/12/2023 om 13:54 schreef Wei ZHOU: Hi Wido, It looks you need a file like https://github.com

Re: Question about ObjectStoreDriver for implementing Ceph driver

it, thanks for the feedback! I'll work on this in two different commits. Wido Regards. Regards. From: Wido den Hollander Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 1:28:56 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; kis...@apache.org Subject: Question about ObjectStoreDriver

Re: New Object Storage - Huawei OBS

It is working now! PR is out: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8389 On 12/16/23 13:14, Wido den Hollander wrote: On 12/15/23 20:09, Wei ZHOU wrote: Hi Wido, I just tested your branch, it looks ok ( https://github.com/wido/cloudstack/commits/ceph-object-store). Yes, it works now

Object Store browser connects over HTTP while HTTPS is set in URL

Hi, While testing the Ceph RGW plugin [0] for the Object Store driver I noticed the bucket browser isn't working. So I debugged my Firefox browser and I noticed that it tries to connect to http://ceph01.holfra.eu/ (not SSL) while the store's URL is httpS://ceph01.holfra.eu/ My debugger

Question about ObjectStoreDriver for implementing Ceph driver

Hi (Kishan), I am making a first attempt [0] to implement a Ceph RGW [1] Object Store Driver for CloudStack and I have a few questions about the code. While implementing the Ceph RGW driver I have noticed that some methods are provided the bucket's name (as a String) as an argument, but I'd

Re: New Object Storage - Huawei OBS

On 12/15/23 09:41, Ronald Feicht wrote: Hi Kishan, when I add my module to client/pom.xml I get the following error and http://192.168.17.252:8080/client/ returns "HTTP ERROR 503 Service Unavailable" because of the following exception: [WARNING] Failed startup of context

Re: Apache CloudStack and Ceph Day - February 22, Amsterdam

Op 09/01/2024 om 13:45 schreef Ivet Petrova: Dear community members, We managed to finalised the date for our joint event with the Ceph community. I am happy to share that we are doing it on February 22nd, in Amsterdam, Netherlands. The event will be hosted by Adyen, the address is: Rokin

Re: New Object Storage - Huawei OBS

Op 14/12/2023 om 10:51 schreef Ronald Feicht: Hi, I am trying to write an Object Storage plugin for Huawei OBS using Minio as example. I added my plugin code to the plugins/storage/object/ directory, added my plugin into plugins/pom.xml and added the string 'Huawei OBS' to

Re: [VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum

-0: Agree with Nux (see his concern in another e-mail) Op 04/12/2023 om 22:56 schreef Nux: -0 - I have voiced my concerns already. On 2023-12-04 08:01, Rohit Yadav wrote: All, Following the discussion thread on adopting Github Discussions as users forum [1], I put the following proposal

Re: [VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum

-0: Agree with Nux (see his concern in another e-mail) Op 04/12/2023 om 22:56 schreef Nux: -0 - I have voiced my concerns already. On 2023-12-04 08:01, Rohit Yadav wrote: All, Following the discussion thread on adopting Github Discussions as users forum [1], I put the following proposal

Re: [PROPOSAL] version naming : drop the 4.

Op 22/01/2024 om 12:17 schreef Wei ZHOU: +1 with 20.0 5.0 sounds like a leap with lots of significant changes. Unfortunately it has not been discussed what needs to be done. 20.0 (or 24.0) looks better. We could look at Ubuntu, and other projects, and call it 2025.01 if we release it in

Re: CSEUG - September, Germany

Op 28/02/2024 om 16:29 schreef Ivet Petrova: Hi all, I would like to propose to organise the CSEUG next meeting on September 12th in Germany. I already had a few informal conversations with community members in Germany, who are willing to help. Do you all think the date is OK and we can

Re: CloudStack Collaboration conference 2024 - Registration is NOW OPEN

Great! I'm going to be there! :-) Wido Op 08/04/2024 om 16:41 schreef Ivet Petrova: Hi All, I am delighted to announce that the registration for CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2024 is now open. I also would like to encourage you all to register here:

<    5   6   7   8   9   10