Would try to contribute the code to support VMware ingestion with vSAN.
On 2020/05/25 09:48:51, Andrija Panic wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> code is free/open for merges again.
>
> Regards,
> Andrija
>
> On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 10:12, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> > H all, I've been working with Andrija
Thanks Andrjia !
And appreciated for effort to manage the coming 4.14 release.
Regards,
在 2019-12-24 20:03:51,"Andrija Panic" 写道:
>Jerry,
>
>that all is going to be in both 4.13.1 and 4.14, but 4.13 will be
>**probably** March 2020 or later.
>
>On Tue, 24 Dec 2019, 12:27 li jerry, wrote:
>
Citrix XenDesktp was used to be able to be integrated with Citrix CloudPlatform
(CloudStack). The last version we have tested withou issue is Apache
CloudStack 4.7. 1.
Recently we re-validated the integration with latest version of each
components, but failed this time.
a) Citrix
+1, could be a major change leading to CloudStack 5.0
At 2019-10-08 04:11:28, "Ezequiel Mc Govern"
wrote:
>+1
>
>> On 7 Oct 2019, at 08:31, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> The feedback and response has been positive on the proposal to use Primate
>> as the modern UI for CloudStack
BTW, I think we should update the LTS release calendar on Wiki too, since
4.13 has become the latest LTS.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS
Regards,
At 2019-09-24 21:37:58, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:
>Awesome work ! And
Awesome work ! And also noted a bunch of document update.
Will translate and post it in OpenSource China community .
At 2019-09-24 19:38:21, "Andrija Panic" wrote:
>A great release (lot's of new and interesting features and bug fixes) -
>awesome work everyone!
>Thx @Paul Angus
>
>On Tue,
+1 on 'Scale up running vms on kvm', auto scale will be even better.
At 2019-09-09 09:42:10, "Wei ZHOU" wrote:
>Some ideas from me
>1. Scale up running vms on kvm
>2. Enable security groups on shared networks in advanced zone.
>
>-Wei
>
>On Friday, 6 September 2019, Paul Angus wrote:
>
+1, almost a 'must-have' feature in nowdays.
At 2019-08-09 00:40:57, "Sven Vogel" wrote:
>+1 from me too. I hope so with refactor or without :)
>
>Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
>
>__
>
>Sven Vogel
>Teamlead Platform
>
>EWERK RZ GmbH
>Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
>P +49 341 42649 - 11
>F +49
We have upgraded our production to 4.11.3 last weekend.
Thanks development team ! We are gaining more confidence on ACS.
At 2019-07-14 12:18:30, "Anurag Awasthi" wrote:
>Congratulations everyone!
>
>Regards,
>Anurag Awasthi
>
>From: Rohit Yadav
>Sent: Sunday,
Hi, Community
We have a environment with XenServer 7.1LTS + ACS 4.11.2, some hosts has
multiple Nividia P4 graphic cards installed.
Per business requirement, we need provision VM with passthrough GPUs. We
expect to provide users various offerings, e.g. 1GPU/VM, 2GPU/VM... but it
Understood, awaiting 4.13, thanks !
At 2019-06-06 10:46:35, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>Hi Haijiao,
>
>We cannot accept or back port completely new features on 4.11 branch, we
>should ideally only accept bugfixes but sometimes small infra/operational
>enhance
I know typically 4.11.3 would not accept new features but bug fixes.
We have a couple of clients that need 'uploading local ISO via UI or API', just
wondering if 4.11.3 can include the PR Add local ISO upload via UI #3251 ,
given it's already merged into master?
Thanks !
Hi, Andrija
I think Ceph has a versioning convention that x.2.z means stable release for
production. http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/releases/schedule/
x.0.z - development releases (for early testers and the brave at heart)
x.1.z - release candidates (for test clusters, brave users)
x.2.z -
Noted Nuage's decision on ceasing SDN plugin for CloudStack. Just wondering is
there any other SDN solutoin can be integrated with CloudStack ?
Thanks !
Regards,
Hi, Wei
You rock !It's exactly what we want.
Would suggest community to update the 'deployment planner' part in the doc,
link to these 2 important global parameters.
Thanks again , Wei !
在2019年04月09 15时18分, "Wei ZHOU"写道:
Hi Haijiao,
Try the following global conf
Even we have ran CloudStack for years,still not quite clear about how 'First
Fit' method exactly works ?
It's stated in http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org that if select 'First Fit'
method in 'Deployment Planner', user shall 'places new VMs on the first host
that is found having
Great job, new RM and new release !
在2019年03月20 05时36分, "Gabriel Beims Bräscher"写道:
Hi all,
After 3 business days, the vote for CloudStack 4.12.0.0 *passes* with 4 PMC
+ 2 non-PMC votes.
+1 (PMC / binding)
* Wido den Hollander
* Simon Weller
* Rafael Weingärtner
* Rohit Yadav
+1
will stay on 4.11.x for another 3-6 months at least.
Another 4.11 LTS release will give users more confidence and prove the value of
LTS.
Just my 2 cents.
在2019年03月14 17时48分, "Giles Sirett"写道:
Hi Haijiao
I would *expect* 4.13.0 (LTS) to be released in Q2, which will supersede
HI, Community
According to the LTS roadmap
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS , current 4.11.x is
supposed to reach EOL on Jul.1 this year.
Seems the next candidate of LTS is not available yet ( 4.13 ?) , do we have
plan to extend the life of 4.11.x and at
y command 'ethtool -k eth0 tso off', the issue is
just gone, we can run iperf for testing without any drop for a couple of hours.
Does it make sense ? Any improvement can be implemented from ACS side ?
Thanks !
在2019年02月22 23时20分, "Haijiao"<18602198...@163.com>写道:
Th
Thanks Dag, you are always helpful !
We will look into your sharing and come back.
在2019年02月22 17时26分, "Dag Sonstebo"写道:
Hi Haijiao,
We've come across similar things in the past. In short - what is your XenServer
bond mode? Is it active-active (mode 7) or LACP (mode 4)? (
Hi, Devs and Community Users
To be more specific, our environment is built with
* 2 Dell R740XD Servers + Dell Compellent Storage w/ iSCSI
* Each server equiped with two Mellanox Connect-4 LX 25GbE network adapters,
and configured with bond mode(active+active) in XenServer
* CloudStack 4.11.2
This is a fresh installation (XenSever 7.1.2+ACS 4.11.2).
We simply can not revert the VM snapshot though there's no changes at all to VM
or template.
We can consistently reproduce this issue in our environtment with the error log
attached. And we believe the issue doesn't exisit in
Great !
Is it possible to add XenServer 7.6 and XCP-ng 7.6 support into ACS 4.12,
though there's no PR to address it yet ?
Regards,
在2018年12月27 19时02分, "Gabriel Beims Bräscher"写道:
Thanks for the feedback, Rafael.
Updated the PRs/features list:
I – IPv6 support for Advanced network;
Hi,All
Maybe it’s a stupid question, but from the CloudStack API docs, the API
‘revertSnapshot’ is ONLY supported with KVM, but not others, e.g. XenServer or
VMware .
Is there any special reason for this ? Shall we expect this feature included
in coming release ACS ?
Agree. And I suppose 4.11 will be the next LTS ?
I think community has lots of good initiatives in past years, but most
important is to 'insist' and make it happen. LTS concept is one of good
references.
Regards,
在2017年11月22 14时13分, "Milamber"写道:
Sound good for
Hi, Dev team
Not see much info about the next version of CloudStack.
Keen to know as we are evaluating the proper version to upgrade this year.
1. Will ACS 4.11 be the next LTS version according to road map ?
2. What's the design targets and key features to be included in 4.11?
3. Who
Awesome work, I know lots of community users will love it .
在2017年08月29 13时57分, "sachin patil"写道:
Hello,
I have integrated noVNC to cloudstack as my gsoc project for this year,
under the guidance of my mentors @Syed Ahmed and @Rohit Yadav.
The features that have
Agree, unless we bring in architecture changes and/or significant improvments,
we should still stay on the 4.1x
Personally, i think these features may make ACS really qualified to 5.0
- VR enhancement, e.g. Vyos
- API 2.0
- Fully redundant VPC ( it's broken in current version)
-
Finally 4.10 arrives. True achievement of whole community !
Thanks Rajani !
在2017年07月06 19时54分, "Wido den Hollander"写道:
> Op 6 juli 2017 om 12:09 schreef Wei ZHOU :
>
>
> nice!!
Indeed! Let's go for 4.11 :)
Wido
>
> 2017-07-06 11:56 GMT+02:00
I saw Pierre-Luc Dion is working on a PR upon this, but it's not included in
4.10 yet, maybe 4.11
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9839
在2017年06月21 10时24分, "Marty Godsey"写道:
Is XenServer 7.1 support being added in this release?
Regards,
Marty Godsey
HI, Rajani
I think these 4 are ready and good for merging into RC3.
CLOUDSTACK-9690: Scale CentOS7 VM fails with error #1849
CLOUDSTACK-9017 : VPC VR DHCP broken for multihomed guest VMs #2082
CLOUDSTACK-9824: Resource count for Primary storage is considered twice - while
creating and while
.
Thanks for your effort, good job !
在2017年05月09 10时04分, "Rajani Karuturi"<raj...@apache.org>写道:
It's waiting on test update from haijiao
~Rajani
Sent from phone.
On 8 May 2017 8:05 p.m., "Will Stevens" <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote:
> https://github.com
Hi,
Happy to see most of blockers are already addressed in the latest 4.10 master.
But we still see the issue that the password provided by ACS is incorrect while
user try to reset the VM password. It seems that old problem comes back again.
Can anyone test and confirm ? Thanks !
时33分, "Haijiao"<18602198...@163.com>写道:
Thanks Will,
will test this week.
在2017年04月25 04时03分, "Will Stevens"<wstev...@cloudops.com>写道:
Here is the fix to this: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2062
Will STEVENS
Lead Developer
On Mon, A
Thanks Will,
will test this week.
在2017年04月25 04时03分, "Will Stevens"<wstev...@cloudops.com>写道:
Here is the fix to this: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2062
Will STEVENS
Lead Developer
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Haijiao <18602198...@
Hi Will
Any progress about this issue ?
tks
Sent from my mobile
- 转发的邮件 -
发件人: Haijiao
发送日期: 2017年04月14日 23:21
收件人: dev
抄送人:
主题: Re:Re: [4.10] VPN disconnected while network changes taken
Sure, Karuturi
Logged a bug in Jira, thanks!
CLOUDSTACK-9878 Remote Access VPN
@accelerite.com>写道:
Hi Rajani,
I will pickup CLOUDSTACK-9849.
Regards,
Sateesh
On 10/04/17, 11:21 AM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org> wrote:
@Nicolas and @Haijiao
Noted the PRs. I will see what all can be merged and do the
needful.
@All
Any take
n April 19, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Haijiao (18602198...@163.com) wrote:
Can we merge the rest of PRs already have 2 LGTMs while community is still
dealing with these blokcers ?
在2017年04月19 13时55分, "Rajani Karuturi"<raj...@apache.org>写道:
A quick update one RC2:
There are the cur
* H3J 1S6
>>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <
>>> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I have this on my to-do list. It might take me a while, though. At the
>>> > time
Sure, Karuturi
Logged a bug in Jira, thanks!
CLOUDSTACK-9878 Remote Access VPN that losing connection when new network
configs are introduced
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9878
在2017年04月14 13时14分, "Rajani Karuturi"<raj...@apache.org>写道:
Hi
network configs are introduced?
Thanks,
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
<https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Haijiao <18602198...@163.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We built and tested the ACS 4.10 from the latest master (Apr.7, 2017)
>
>
>
>
Hi,
We built and tested the ACS 4.10 from the latest master (Apr.7, 2017)
Our environment is,
- ACS: 4.10.0.0-SNAPSHOT
- Management Server: Centos7.2 1151
- Host: Centos7.2 1151
- System VM: systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2
- Network: Isolated Network
- Network Offering:
this on my to-do list. It might take me a while, though. At the
>> > time being, I’m busy with a customer project that is making use of the
>> two
>> > CloudStack environments that I have in my lab. Then, toward the end of
>> next
>> > week, I’m heading to Europe for about
very few people who test/vote on a release and taking more and more
fixes after RC delays it even more if the merged fixes uncover more
blockers.
Also, we don't backport. We forward merge(there can be exceptions).
~Rajani
Sent from phone.
On 30 Mar 2017 7:18 p.m., "Haijiao" &
ote:
>
> To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been
> removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system
> VMs isn’t working properly.
>
> On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:
>
> Seems o
Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?
CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - Daan
Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:
We still have below three blockers open. I will create
Hi, Wido
Maybe it's a good timing to organize community to discuss and refresh the
roadmap of ACS in this year. (current one on Wiki is supposed to be updated)
We need prioritze the tasks and concentrate our resource. That's quite
important to make ACS successfully evolved IMHO.
Regards,
, "Rajani Karuturi"<raj...@apache.org>写道:
1866 - failed BVT results(may not be related. But, needs to be
checked. Also, jenkins and travis failed)
1967 - no test results
rest merged.
Thanks,
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On March 4, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Haijiao (18602198...@163.com
I think these PRs have met the criteria for merging. Can we have them included
in RC2 ?
CLOUDSTACK-9569: propagate global configuration
router.aggregation.command.each.timeout to KVM agent #1856
Advanced isolated network egress destination cidr support added#1866
CLOUDSTACK-9698 [VMware]
Expect the following PRs to be merged into 4.10, thanks !
PR #1929CLOUDSTACK-9770: fix missing ip routes in VR,
2 LGTM ready
PR #1915CLOUDSTACK-9746 system-vm: logrotate config causes critical
failures
Thanks for testing and summarizing.
2 PRs are actually available for review, can we validate and include them in
4.10 as they addresss important VR issues.
CLOUDSTACK-9692->PR #1871 Fix password server issue in redundant
VRs
CLOUDSTACK-9712->PR #1890 FIX issue
I am not a developer, but thanks you all for this another great achievement !
Understand how hard to get all the things sorted out. Just thinking we
probably need 1-2 assistants to support RM going forward, share the workload
like documentation, release notes, PR tracking...
These
Hi Rohit
Thanks for your hardworking like Santa Claus !
Is that possible to include the PRs below in 4.9.2 LTS as well ?
#977 VM Snapshotting implementation for KVM (lots of people awaiting for
this)
#1794added more guest os (a simple to one to support latest OS)
#1849Scale
The chang log seems not working
Sent from my mobile
On 2016-12-10 11:11 , Rohit Yadav Wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.9.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
Hi, John
Is that possible to include these 2 PRs in 4.10 since 4.10 is supposed to be a
release with new features.
#1711 XenServer 7 Supporthttps://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
#977 VM Snapshotting implementation for KVM
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/977
So cool, thats the feature lots of people awaiting and makes 4.10 shinning
Sent from my mobile
On 2016-10-17 23:28 , Syed Ahmed Wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have some free time on my hands and was trying to add XenServer 7
support. There seems to be only one line change that was required to add
it. I
Though I am one of the silent majority, I would thank John the dev team for
your continuous effort, you keep ACS alive and better !
Just heard one of biggest finance company in China running 10,000+ VMs on ACS
4.4 for production/dev/QAS, you guys should be proud of that.
Salute to you!
Hi, Devs
We have a small production environment consists of 5 hosts (KVM, Ubuntu 14.04)
and the secondary storage is NFS running on an separated management host.
Days ago, we wrongly put one host in 'maintenance' which caused all the VMs
running on that host to migrate to other available
Hi, Gents
Anyone tested RC2 with redudant VR configuration ? I think there are some
issues not fixed yet, e.g. password server.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9385
We will test these days and come back.
supports storage backends that
utilize QCOW2.
The PR is here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/977
- Si
________
From: Haijiao <18602198...@163.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 9:25 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [Feature Request] VM Snapshot based on K
Understand the technical complexity of this feature.
Just curious how the other ‘stacks’ get the VM live snapshot to work, e.g.
Proxmox VE
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Live_Snapshots
Hi, Developers
We deployed ACS+KVM+Ceph in our environment. Everything looks fine except
the VM snapshot feature (not volume backup) is missing in current ACS
version.
Seems OpenStack can be in cooperation with Ceph well with VM snapshot
enabled, wondoering if we can have this on the roadmap
Hi, Will
Can you put #1410 'fix issue disk I/O throttling not applied'
(CLOUDSTACK-6928) on your radar too ?
thanks!
64 matches
Mail list logo