Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

Thanks Bobby, I've just started the RC1 voting thread.


- Rohit


From: Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 2:57:06 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi Rohit, I don’t think we need to include any other blocker at this point, 
smoketests are passing and it’s looking good.
I’ll be happy to help you out with upgrade testing from 4.9.2

Thanks,
Bobby.

boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On Aug 28, 2017, at 3:22 PM, Rohit Yadav 
<rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:

All,


I'll cut 4.9.3.0 RC1 before end of tomorrow, seeking any comments and blockers 
from the community. Thank you.


- Rohit


From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:49:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


Over the past couple of weeks, we've reviewed, tested and merge several PRs. In 
the recent Trillian test run against latest 4.9 branch, against KVM, VMware and 
XenServer all smoke tests passed except for rVR and rVPC related failures which 
are same as the failures in 4.9.2.0. The most common failure in the rVR setup 
is that the MASTER VR does not work properly, however a workaround is to reboot 
it, which causes BACKUP VR to takeover as MASTER and routes, private gateways 
and other issues resolve themselves.


During this effort, we've also tried to stabilize master branch and currently, 
most smoke tests are passing on master for KVM, XenServer, VMware except for 
rVR, rVPC tests, and some intermittent failures seen for some volume, vpn, 
snapshot related tests.


With this, we'll be running component tests and hopefully cut 4.9.3.0 RC1 for 
voting soon.


4.9 smoketest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2217

Master smoketests PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2225


- Rohit


From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:34:29 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi Alireza,


One of the issues mentioned may have been already fixed in 4.9 branch and will 
make its way in 4.9.3.0. For the other issue, a fix/PR does not exist already. 
Given, it's not a blocker/critical issue and freeze is tomorrow, if we don't 
have a PR soon it will likely get fixed in future releases. Thanks.


- Rohit


From: Alireza Eskandari 
<astro.alir...@gmail.com<mailto:astro.alir...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2017 12:53:41 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi Rohit
Please consider these bugs in next release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10033
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9994

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com><http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/><http://www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/>>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Boris Stoyanov]

Hi Rohit, I don’t think we need to include any other blocker at this point, 
smoketests are passing and it’s looking good.
I’ll be happy to help you out with upgrade testing from 4.9.2

Thanks,
Bobby.

boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On Aug 28, 2017, at 3:22 PM, Rohit Yadav 
<rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:

All,


I'll cut 4.9.3.0 RC1 before end of tomorrow, seeking any comments and blockers 
from the community. Thank you.


- Rohit


From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:49:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


Over the past couple of weeks, we've reviewed, tested and merge several PRs. In 
the recent Trillian test run against latest 4.9 branch, against KVM, VMware and 
XenServer all smoke tests passed except for rVR and rVPC related failures which 
are same as the failures in 4.9.2.0. The most common failure in the rVR setup 
is that the MASTER VR does not work properly, however a workaround is to reboot 
it, which causes BACKUP VR to takeover as MASTER and routes, private gateways 
and other issues resolve themselves.


During this effort, we've also tried to stabilize master branch and currently, 
most smoke tests are passing on master for KVM, XenServer, VMware except for 
rVR, rVPC tests, and some intermittent failures seen for some volume, vpn, 
snapshot related tests.


With this, we'll be running component tests and hopefully cut 4.9.3.0 RC1 for 
voting soon.


4.9 smoketest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2217

Master smoketests PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2225


- Rohit


From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:34:29 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi Alireza,


One of the issues mentioned may have been already fixed in 4.9 branch and will 
make its way in 4.9.3.0. For the other issue, a fix/PR does not exist already. 
Given, it's not a blocker/critical issue and freeze is tomorrow, if we don't 
have a PR soon it will likely get fixed in future releases. Thanks.


- Rohit


From: Alireza Eskandari 
<astro.alir...@gmail.com<mailto:astro.alir...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2017 12:53:41 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi Rohit
Please consider these bugs in next release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10033
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9994

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com><http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/><http://www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/>>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

All,


I'll cut 4.9.3.0 RC1 before end of tomorrow, seeking any comments and blockers 
from the community. Thank you.


- Rohit


From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:49:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


Over the past couple of weeks, we've reviewed, tested and merge several PRs. In 
the recent Trillian test run against latest 4.9 branch, against KVM, VMware and 
XenServer all smoke tests passed except for rVR and rVPC related failures which 
are same as the failures in 4.9.2.0. The most common failure in the rVR setup 
is that the MASTER VR does not work properly, however a workaround is to reboot 
it, which causes BACKUP VR to takeover as MASTER and routes, private gateways 
and other issues resolve themselves.


During this effort, we've also tried to stabilize master branch and currently, 
most smoke tests are passing on master for KVM, XenServer, VMware except for 
rVR, rVPC tests, and some intermittent failures seen for some volume, vpn, 
snapshot related tests.


With this, we'll be running component tests and hopefully cut 4.9.3.0 RC1 for 
voting soon.


4.9 smoketest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2217

Master smoketests PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2225


- Rohit


From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:34:29 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi Alireza,


One of the issues mentioned may have been already fixed in 4.9 branch and will 
make its way in 4.9.3.0. For the other issue, a fix/PR does not exist already. 
Given, it's not a blocker/critical issue and freeze is tomorrow, if we don't 
have a PR soon it will likely get fixed in future releases. Thanks.


- Rohit


From: Alireza Eskandari <astro.alir...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2017 12:53:41 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi Rohit
Please consider these bugs in next release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10033
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9994

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

All,


Over the past couple of weeks, we've reviewed, tested and merge several PRs. In 
the recent Trillian test run against latest 4.9 branch, against KVM, VMware and 
XenServer all smoke tests passed except for rVR and rVPC related failures which 
are same as the failures in 4.9.2.0. The most common failure in the rVR setup 
is that the MASTER VR does not work properly, however a workaround is to reboot 
it, which causes BACKUP VR to takeover as MASTER and routes, private gateways 
and other issues resolve themselves.


During this effort, we've also tried to stabilize master branch and currently, 
most smoke tests are passing on master for KVM, XenServer, VMware except for 
rVR, rVPC tests, and some intermittent failures seen for some volume, vpn, 
snapshot related tests.


With this, we'll be running component tests and hopefully cut 4.9.3.0 RC1 for 
voting soon.


4.9 smoketest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2217

Master smoketests PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2225


- Rohit


From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:34:29 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi Alireza,


One of the issues mentioned may have been already fixed in 4.9 branch and will 
make its way in 4.9.3.0. For the other issue, a fix/PR does not exist already. 
Given, it's not a blocker/critical issue and freeze is tomorrow, if we don't 
have a PR soon it will likely get fixed in future releases. Thanks.


- Rohit


From: Alireza Eskandari <astro.alir...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2017 12:53:41 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi Rohit
Please consider these bugs in next release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10033
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9994

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Alireza,


One of the issues mentioned may have been already fixed in 4.9 branch and will 
make its way in 4.9.3.0. For the other issue, a fix/PR does not exist already. 
Given, it's not a blocker/critical issue and freeze is tomorrow, if we don't 
have a PR soon it will likely get fixed in future releases. Thanks.


- Rohit


From: Alireza Eskandari <astro.alir...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2017 12:53:41 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi Rohit
Please consider these bugs in next release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10033
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9994

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Alireza Eskandari]

Hi Rohit
Please consider these bugs in next release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10033
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9994

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

All,


We've helped with several PR reviews and merges recently, both in 4.9 and 
master.

We'll stop accepting any changes by end of next week (18 August), afterwards 
we'll only accept test and blocker fixes blocking the release.


Feel free to suggest any commits/fixes/PRs we should consider towards 4.9.3.0.


Following satisfactory test results (both Travis, Trillian and others) on 4.9 
branch we'll cut 4.9.3.0 RC1 for voting.


Regards.


From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 1:05:56 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi Rohit

I previous suggested these for 4.9.3.0

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and 
run twice on mgmt servers)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - 
also exists in 4.10)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after 
vRouter reboot)

I'd also like to suggest these:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1246 (unable to use reserved IP range 
in a network)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2201 (VPC VR doesn't respond to DNS 
requests from remote access vpn clients)


Thanks
Sean

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 5:56 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


We'll accept bugfixes on 4.9 branch till end of next week, following which I'll 
start release work towards 4.9.3.0 (LTS) release. Please help review 
outstanding PRs, share PRs that we should consider and advise/suggest issues 
that need to be reverted/backported, for example see: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052


Thank you for your support and co-operation.


- Rohit


From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 1:26:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


I've started looking into reviewing/testing/merging of the PRs targeting 4.9+, 
I'll share some plans around 4.9.3.0 soon. Meanwhile, help in reporting any 
major/critical bugs and PRs we should consider reviewing/testing/merging. 
Thanks.


- Rohit

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue

RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Sean Lair]

Hi Rohit

I previous suggested these for 4.9.3.0

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and 
run twice on mgmt servers)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - 
also exists in 4.10)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after 
vRouter reboot)

I'd also like to suggest these:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1246 (unable to use reserved IP range 
in a network)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2201 (VPC VR doesn't respond to DNS 
requests from remote access vpn clients)


Thanks
Sean

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 5:56 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


We'll accept bugfixes on 4.9 branch till end of next week, following which I'll 
start release work towards 4.9.3.0 (LTS) release. Please help review 
outstanding PRs, share PRs that we should consider and advise/suggest issues 
that need to be reverted/backported, for example see: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052


Thank you for your support and co-operation.


- Rohit


From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 1:26:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


I've started looking into reviewing/testing/merging of the PRs targeting 4.9+, 
I'll share some plans around 4.9.3.0 soon. Meanwhile, help in reporting any 
major/critical bugs and PRs we should consider reviewing/testing/merging. 
Thanks.


- Rohit

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
  
 

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

All,


We'll accept bugfixes on 4.9 branch till end of next week, following which I'll 
start release work towards 4.9.3.0 (LTS) release. Please help review 
outstanding PRs, share PRs that we should consider and advise/suggest issues 
that need to be reverted/backported, for example see: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052


Thank you for your support and co-operation.


- Rohit


From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 1:26:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


I've started looking into reviewing/testing/merging of the PRs targeting 4.9+, 
I'll share some plans around 4.9.3.0 soon. Meanwhile, help in reporting any 
major/critical bugs and PRs we should consider reviewing/testing/merging. 
Thanks.


- Rohit

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

All,


I've started looking into reviewing/testing/merging of the PRs targeting 4.9+, 
I'll share some plans around 4.9.3.0 soon. Meanwhile, help in reporting any 
major/critical bugs and PRs we should consider reviewing/testing/merging. 
Thanks.


- Rohit

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

Lotic,


The specific PR has been merged on 4.9 branch and will make its way to future 
4.9.3.0 release.


- Rohit


From: Lotic Lists <li...@lotic.com.br>
Sent: 13 July 2017 17:47:36
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi Rohit.

I would suggest the 1829 [1]

It's a big problem with XenServer and more than 2 datadisks attached per VM 
(HVM)

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829


rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 11:42
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze 
the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release 
plan as soon as next week.


- Rohit


From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi,

I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131

Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.

Wido

> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>:
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> 
> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running all of 
> these fixes for several months without issues.  The code changes are all very 
> easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs
> scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of
> S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work
> after vRouter reboot)
>
> Thanks
> Sean
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> All,
>
>
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the 
> next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans 
> or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather 
> list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 
> 4.9.3.0.
>
>
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are 
> new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes 
> and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already 
> committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>
>
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 
> 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider 
> reverting:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some 
> fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise 
> objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>
>
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging 
> on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Lotic Lists]

Hi Rohit.

I would suggest the 1829 [1]

It's a big problem with XenServer and more than 2 datadisks attached per VM 
(HVM)

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829 


-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 11:42
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze 
the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release 
plan as soon as next week.


- Rohit


From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi,

I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131

Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.

Wido

> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>:
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> 
> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running all of 
> these fixes for several months without issues.  The code changes are all very 
> easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs 
> scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of 
> S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work 
> after vRouter reboot)
>
> Thanks
> Sean
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> All,
>
>
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the 
> next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans 
> or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather 
> list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 
> 4.9.3.0.
>
>
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are 
> new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes 
> and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already 
> committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>
>
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 
> 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider 
> reverting:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some 
> fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise 
> objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>
>
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging 
> on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

Outback,


I think there exists some initial support for XenServer 7.1 in 4.9.2.0, 
4.9/branch however consider installing/upgrading to 4.10.0.0 (once it is 
announced) which should have the support.


- Rohit


From: Outback Dingo <outbackdi...@gmail.com>
Sent: 12 July 2017 21:22:53
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)


rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> All,
>
>
> Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can 
> freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a 
> release plan as soon as next week.
>
>

Support for XenServer 7.1 would be nice


> - Rohit
>
> 
> From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
> Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
> To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Hi,
>
> I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
>
> Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
>
> Wido
>
>> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>:
>>
>>
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for sharing.
>>
>>
>> - Rohit
>>
>> ____________
>> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
>> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>>
>> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running all of 
>> these fixes for several months without issues.  The code changes are all 
>> very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>>
>> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled 
>> and run twice on mgmt servers)
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S 
>> VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after 
>> vRouter reboot)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sean
>>
>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around 
>> the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, 
>> plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to 
>> gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS 
>> release 4.9.3.0.
>>
>>
>> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are 
>> new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes 
>> and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already 
>> committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>>
>>
>> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 
>> 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider 
>> reverting:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>>
>>
>> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some 
>> fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise 
>> objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>>
>>
>> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging 
>> on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>>
>>
>> - Rohit
>>
>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Outback Dingo]

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> All,
>
>
> Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can 
> freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a 
> release plan as soon as next week.
>
>

Support for XenServer 7.1 would be nice


> - Rohit
>
> 
> From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
> Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
> To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Hi,
>
> I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
>
> Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
>
> Wido
>
>> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>:
>>
>>
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for sharing.
>>
>>
>> - Rohit
>>
>> ________
>> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
>> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>>
>> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running all of 
>> these fixes for several months without issues.  The code changes are all 
>> very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>>
>> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled 
>> and run twice on mgmt servers)
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S 
>> VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after 
>> vRouter reboot)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sean
>>
>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around 
>> the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, 
>> plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to 
>> gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS 
>> release 4.9.3.0.
>>
>>
>> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are 
>> new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes 
>> and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already 
>> committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>>
>>
>> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 
>> 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider 
>> reverting:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>>
>>
>> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some 
>> fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise 
>> objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>>
>>
>> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging 
>> on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>>
>>
>> - Rohit
>>
>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

All,


Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze 
the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release 
plan as soon as next week.


- Rohit


From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi,

I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131

Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.

Wido

> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>:
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> 
> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running all of 
> these fixes for several months without issues.  The code changes are all very 
> easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and 
> run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs 
> - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after 
> vRouter reboot)
>
> Thanks
> Sean
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> All,
>
>
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the 
> next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans 
> or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather 
> list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 
> 4.9.3.0.
>
>
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are 
> new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes 
> and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already 
> committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>
>
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 
> 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider 
> reverting:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some 
> fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise 
> objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>
>
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging 
> on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Wido den Hollander]

Hi,

I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131

Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.

Wido

> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>:
> 
> 
> Hi Sean,
> 
> 
> Thanks for sharing.
> 
> 
> - Rohit
> 
> 
> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
> 
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running all of 
> these fixes for several months without issues.  The code changes are all very 
> easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
> 
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and 
> run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs 
> - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after 
> vRouter reboot)
> 
> Thanks
> Sean
> 
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
> 
> All,
> 
> 
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the 
> next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans 
> or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather 
> list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 
> 4.9.3.0.
> 
> 
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are 
> new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes 
> and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already 
> committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
> 
> 
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 
> 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider 
> reverting:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
> 
> 
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some 
> fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise 
> objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
> 
> 
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging 
> on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
> 
> 
> - Rohit
> 
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
> 
> 
>

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Sean,


Thanks for sharing.


- Rohit


From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running all of 
these fixes for several months without issues.  The code changes are all very 
easy/small, but had a big impact for us.

I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and 
run twice on mgmt servers)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - 
also exists in 4.10)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after 
vRouter reboot)

Thanks
Sean

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the 
next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or 
dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of 
issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.


To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new 
feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and 
security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already 
committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).


Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 
4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider 
reverting:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9


<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some 
fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise 
objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052


Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 
4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.


- Rohit

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue

RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Sean Lair]

Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running all of 
these fixes for several months without issues.  The code changes are all very 
easy/small, but had a big impact for us.

I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and 
run twice on mgmt servers)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - 
also exists in 4.10)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after 
vRouter reboot)

Thanks
Sean

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the 
next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or 
dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of 
issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.


To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new 
feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and 
security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already 
committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).


Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 
4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider 
reverting:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9


I started backporting some 
fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise 
objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052


Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 
4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.


- Rohit

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue