Hi,
To conclude, after doing a lot of work in debugging we were able to reduce the
deployment of our VRs from ~2 hours to ~5 MINUTES.
Two PRs are open for this against the 4.9 branch:
- https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2077
- https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089
The problem
5 pm, "Remi Bergsma" <rberg...@schubergphilis.com>
> > > > > On 03/05/2017, 13:44, "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> > > > > From: Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com>
> > > > > Sen
gt; > > >
> > > > Biligual auto correct use. Read at your own risico
> > > >
> > > > On 3 May 2017 2:25 pm, "Remi Bergsma" <rberg...@schubergphilis.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Always happy to share, but I won’t have time to work on porting this
mi Bergsma" <rberg...@schubergphilis.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Always happy to share, but I won’t have time to work on porting this to
> > > > CloudStack any time soon.
> > > >
> > > > Regards, Remi
> > > >
> >
dav" <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Remi, thanks for sharing. We would love to have those changes
> (for
> > > 4.9+), looking forward to your pull requests.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards.
> > &g
gt;
> > ____
> > From: Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com>
> > Sent: 03 May 2017 16:58:18
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Very slow Virtual Router provisioning with 4.9.2.0
> >
> > H
Thanks Remi for the hint and Daan for pick it up! That is why I like
open source software development and this project ;)
On 05/03/2017 02:49 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Happy to pick this up, Remi. I'm travelling now but will look at both on
> Friday.
.9+), looking forward to your pull requests.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com>
> Sent: 03 May 2017 16:58:18
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Very slow Virtual Router provisioning with 4.9.2.0
>
> H
ard to your pull requests.
Regards.
From: Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com>
Sent: 03 May 2017 16:58:18
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Very slow Virtual Router provisioning with 4.9.2.0
Hi,
I can lookup the patches. Not handy on my phone now ;-)
>
> Regards, Remi
>
> From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 7:57:08 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Very slow Virtual Router provisioning
lookup the patches. Not handy on my phone now ;-)
>
> Regards, Remi
>
> From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 7:57:08 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Very slow Virtual Router provisioning with 4.9.2
the patches. Not handy on my phone now ;-)
Regards, Remi
From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 7:57:08 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Very slow Virtual Router provisioning with 4.9.2.0
Hi,
Last night I upgraded a CloudStack
Another reason of slow can be VR configuration(persistent VR configuration
design). When one component config apply, whole VR configuration apply is
executed. Due to this the VR boot up time will increase.
Thanks,
Jayapal
> On May 3, 2017, at 1:55 PM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier
Hi Wido,
Well for us, it's not a version problem, it's simply a design problem. This
VR is very problematic during any upgrade of cloudstack (which I perform
every week almost on our platform), same goes for the secondary storage VMs
which scans all templates. We've planned on our roadmap to get
Hi,
Last night I upgraded a CloudStack 4.5.2 setup to 4.9.2.0. All went well, but
the VR provisioning is terribly slow which causes all kinds of problems.
The vr_cfg.sh and update_config.py scripts start to run. Restart dnsmasq, add
metadata, etc.
But for just 1800 hosts this can take up to 2
15 matches
Mail list logo