To whom JXForms may concern (selectBoolean?)

2003-09-09 Thread Barzilai Spinak
Hello list! I started porting a project from the deprecated XMLForms to JXForms. One problem I found, though, is the lack of an equivalent to the old xf:selectBoolean for cases when I don't need a whole set of values to choose from. The current xf:select works much like the old xf:selectMany.

Re: Future build

2003-09-09 Thread Steven Noels
Antonio Gallardo wrote: Thanks for the reply. It is comfortable. :) ^^^ Even though cocooning requires comfortable couches and plush pillows, I'd rather say 'comforting' here, Antonio. ;-) Cheers, and tnx of course, /Steven -- Steven Noels

Re: Remove problems with the Woody sample

2003-09-09 Thread Bruno Dumon
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 13:39, Hugo Burm wrote: This is about the Bean Binding sample on the Woody samples page, and the Remove option of the Contacts on this page. (Cocoon version: 2.1.2, one day after the release of 2.1.1) 1) If I have more than one Contact (e.g. by adding the lines

Re: Problems integrating Cocoon build in our build system

2003-09-09 Thread Steven Noels
Joerg Heinicke wrote: We have a global repository that now also stores the Cocoon 2.1.1 sources. If one wants to use Cocoon in his project he has to build it after setting some properties (the normal local.*.properties). The Cocoon sources in the repository shall stay untouched of course.

Re: Problems integrating Cocoon build in our build system

2003-09-09 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Now, I have not been looking at it until some minutes ago. But unfortunately it did not help me. The first steps I have already done and the xpatching of any files I don't really need (at least until now). And I wonder how the validate jars works for you if not only by accident. The hard coded

strange ...

2003-09-09 Thread Leszek Gawron
getLogger().error( !! + request.getCharacterEncoding() ); outputs: ERROR (2003-09-09) 14:27.57:265 [sitemap.action.serverpages] (/gemini-manager/projects/server-works/2) Thread-11/request_xsp: !!null all my database scripts gone crazy and mix up all polish letters on inserts LG

[OT] GetTogether - arrivals and departures

2003-09-09 Thread Torsten Curdt
Hi, guys! I thought it might be cool to know when everyone is heading to (and leaving from) Genth. If you already know why not add it to... http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=GetTogetherAttending cheers -- Torsten

Re: strange ...

2003-09-09 Thread Leszek Gawron
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 02:35:10PM +0200, Bruno Dumon wrote: On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 14:30, Leszek Gawron wrote: getLogger().error( !! + request.getCharacterEncoding() ); outputs: ERROR (2003-09-09) 14:27.57:265 [sitemap.action.serverpages] (/gemini-manager/projects/server-works/2)

Re: strange ...

2003-09-09 Thread Leszek Gawron
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 02:35:10PM +0200, Bruno Dumon wrote: I think this couldn't work as the Cocoon FOM when cocoon.request.getParameter( test ) is issued does request.getParameter( test ); while the xsp-request logicsheet performs encoding translation: public static String

Woody: repeater handlers

2003-09-09 Thread Gunter D'Hondt
I'm trying to build a page with two repeater widgets which each have their own events. But the RepeaterHandler (=FormHandler) class can only handle events for one repeater (only one repeaterName, addCommand, removeCommand, etc). Any suggestions how to expand this so that the sample form could

Removing usage of LogKitManager / LogKitManagable

2003-09-09 Thread Peter Royal
Anyone opposed to removing the usage of the LogKitManagable interface from HEAD? The impact is that Loggable components would no longer be able to receive a logger, and on the flipside, Log4J support will be much easier to implement as all logging-impl specific code is then in CocoonServlet,

Re: [RT] Implementing Cocoon Blocks

2003-09-09 Thread Bruno Dumon
(catching up on block discussions...) On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 05:53, Geoff Howard wrote: snip/ Implementation Phases - Phase 1: definition of the contract between the block manager inside cocoon and the standalone block deployer. These contracts include: 1)

Re: strange ...

2003-09-09 Thread Bruno Dumon
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 15:09, Leszek Gawron wrote: On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 02:35:10PM +0200, Bruno Dumon wrote: I think this couldn't work as the Cocoon FOM when cocoon.request.getParameter( test ) is issued does request.getParameter( test ); while the xsp-request logicsheet performs

Re: strange ...

2003-09-09 Thread Leszek Gawron
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:19:17PM +0200, Bruno Dumon wrote: On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 15:09, Leszek Gawron wrote: On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 02:35:10PM +0200, Bruno Dumon wrote: I think this couldn't work as the Cocoon FOM when cocoon.request.getParameter( test ) is issued does

Re: [RT] Implementing Cocoon Blocks

2003-09-09 Thread Bruno Dumon
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 04:57, Geoff Howard wrote: snip/ But this brings up another point - what to do if the wiring.xml and others is deleted? Presumably, all blocks are uninstalled in this state, but what does this do to persistence requirements. Also, how to recreate the deploy step

Exception during undeploy

2003-09-09 Thread Joerg Heinicke
As somebody might remember we had a problem with the undeployment with Tomcat. This was fixed in Cocoon 2.1.1 by updating excalibur event and util concurrent IIRC. Now the undeployment works and no process hangs but I get an exception (see below). Does any body has an idea (JBoss 3.0.6, Tomcat

Re: Removing usage of LogKitManager / LogKitManagable

2003-09-09 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Hello Peter, we already have this: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=106215953707243w=2 and this: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730. If it's wished I can do the change again and commit it immediately. Anybody against it? Joerg Peter Royal wrote: Anyone

Re: Exception during undeploy

2003-09-09 Thread Bruno Dumon
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 17:30, Joerg Heinicke wrote: As somebody might remember we had a problem with the undeployment with Tomcat. This was fixed in Cocoon 2.1.1 by updating excalibur event and util concurrent IIRC. Now the undeployment works and no process hangs but I get an exception (see

Re: [RT] Implementing Cocoon Blocks

2003-09-09 Thread Geoff Howard
Bruno Dumon wrote: (catching up on block discussions...) On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 05:53, Geoff Howard wrote: snip/ Implementation Phases - Phase 1: definition of the contract between the block manager inside cocoon and the standalone block deployer. These contracts include: 1)

Re: [RT] Implementing Cocoon Blocks

2003-09-09 Thread Geoff Howard
Bruno Dumon wrote: On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 04:57, Geoff Howard wrote: snip/ But this brings up another point - what to do if the wiring.xml and others is deleted? Presumably, all blocks are uninstalled in this state, but what does this do to persistence requirements. Also, how to recreate the

Announcing 2.1.1

2003-09-09 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Hi team, The 2.1.1 should now have reached the mirrors. Does someone know how to update the web site and send the announcements ? Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com { XML, Java,

Re: Removing usage of LogKitManager / LogKitManagable

2003-09-09 Thread Peter Royal
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 12:34 PM, Joerg Heinicke wrote: Hello Peter, we already have this: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=106215953707243w=2 and this: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730. If it's wished I can do the change again and commit it

Re: Announcing 2.1.1

2003-09-09 Thread Joerg Heinicke
We are helpless without Carsten :-) Joerg Sylvain Wallez wrote: Hi team, The 2.1.1 should now have reached the mirrors. Does someone know how to update the web site and send the announcements ? Sylvain

Re: Exception during undeploy

2003-09-09 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Bruno Dumon wrote: On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 17:30, Joerg Heinicke wrote: As somebody might remember we had a problem with the undeployment with Tomcat. This was fixed in Cocoon 2.1.1 by updating excalibur event and util concurrent IIRC. Now the undeployment works and no process hangs but I get

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/java/org/apache/cocoon/woody/flow/javascript woody.js

2003-09-09 Thread Bruno Dumon
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 16:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip cvs commit message/ +while (true) { +if (cocoon.request == null) { +// this continuation has been invalidated +this.dead = true; +handleInvalidContinuation(); +

RE: Remove problems with the Woody sample

2003-09-09 Thread Hugo Burm
-Original Message- From: Bruno Dumon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remove problems with the Woody sample On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 13:39, Hugo Burm wrote: This is about the Bean Binding sample on the Woody

New protocol for in-memory resources

2003-09-09 Thread Tuomo L
Hi, I've been playing with the upload-mechanism of Cocoon, and noticed that it's now required to cath the uploaded file since cocoon deletes it (At least this is the behaviour on my 2.1 installation with autosave-upload true and allow-uploads true) I'm working on a ZipArchiveExtractorAction,

Re: New protocol for in-memory resources

2003-09-09 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Tuomo L wrote: Hi, I've been playing with the upload-mechanism of Cocoon, and noticed that it's now required to cath the uploaded file since cocoon deletes it (At least this is the behaviour on my 2.1 installation with autosave-upload true and allow-uploads true) I'm working on a

Re: Announcing 2.1.1

2003-09-09 Thread Steven Noels
Joerg Heinicke wrote: We are helpless without Carsten :-) Joerg Sylvain Wallez wrote: Hi team, The 2.1.1 should now have reached the mirrors. Does someone know how to update the web site and send the announcements ? I'll update the main website tomorrow (just the news page on the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21730] - [PATCH] LogKitManager = LoggerManager

2003-09-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21730] - [PATCH] LogKitManager = LoggerManager

2003-09-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21730] - [PATCH] LogKitManager = LoggerManager

2003-09-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21730] - [PATCH] LogKitManager = LoggerManager

2003-09-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21730] - [PATCH] LogKitManager = LoggerManager

2003-09-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: cvs commit:cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/java/org/apache/cocoon/woody/flow/javascriptwoody.js

2003-09-09 Thread Christopher Oliver
Never. It's a bug in the flow implementation if it is. The script shouldn't check for it. -Original Message- From: Bruno Dumon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 7:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs

Re: New protocol for in-memory resources

2003-09-09 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Tuomo L wrote: It would be convinient, if one could use a protocolthat defines a source (FilePart) located in memory. This could be for example: multipart://foo.zip . Then it would be possible to extract that in-memory zip-file to the target-dir. Is this possible already,

Re: Announcing 2.1.1

2003-09-09 Thread Christopher Oliver
Unfortunately I think 2.1.1 contains a Rhino regression I temporarily introduced while trying to fix bug 22513 which will cause any scripts with nested functions to fail. This includes some of the flow samples like PetStore and JXForms. IMO we are in serious need of regression tests for

[Woody multi page forms] was Re: cvs commit:cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/java/org/apache/cocoon/woody/flow/javascriptwoody.js

2003-09-09 Thread Christopher Oliver
BTW that flowscript code was written with the intention of supporting multi-page Woody forms with automated back/forward navigation as in JXForms. However, when I looked into implementing this I discovered that Woody forms cannot be presented in multiple pages because apparently the entire

[ANN] Another reason to go to the GetTogether

2003-09-09 Thread Matthew Langham
In case any of you are still wondering why you should register for the Cocoon GetTogether (http://www.orixo.com/events/gt2003/) - here's another reason: Pick up your copy of the free, Eclipse based, Cococon tool - sunBow (http://radio.weblogs.com/0108489/). The newest version 2.0, which will be

Re: EJB + Cocoon, Best Practices / Betwixt

2003-09-09 Thread Christoph Gaffga
that invokes the EJB and returns the DTO. It then passes the DTO to Betwixt which converts it to SAX events. I posted the BeanGenerator on the list a Perheaps you are also interested in a BetwixtTransformer, analoge to CastorTransformer? I post it here, perheaps anyone can put it in the