JxPath: Extensions - DynamicPropertyHandler

2003-11-28 Thread Danny Bols
Hello, I am trying to integrate my own DynamicPropertyHandler into JxTemplateGenerator. It seems like JxPath doesn't activate the handler when needed (I don't see any of my log messages added to the handler). I registered the handler this way:

Re: Thank you

2003-11-28 Thread Ugo Cei
Antonio Gallardo wrote: Is woody fast enough to manage the 160 fields in a form? I will be glad to hear about that. Sometimes I feel Woody is a little bit slow. I haven't done any measurements, but with 160 fields it's surely the client that slows down. Rendering that form with Mozilla sends the

Re: Are nested flowscripts possible?

2003-11-28 Thread Marc Portier
Steinar Jonsson wrote: On Thursday 27 November 2003 23:53, Marc Portier wrote: Steinar Jonsson wrote: A flowscript does a sendPageAndWait( request ), and the request happens to start a second flowscript. When that second flowscript has completed its work, how does it get back to where the

Re: Thank you

2003-11-28 Thread Leszek Gawron
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 09:43:19PM -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote: Ugo Cei dijo: Our application has 16 forms for a total of more than 600 fields and all of them are brilliantly handled by Woody. The logic is entirely driven by Flowscript and persistence needs are handled by Hibernate. JX

Bug in JXTemplate??

2003-11-28 Thread Mariusz Sieraczkiewicz
Having p jx:forEach select=#{queryWrapper/data} p jx:out value=#{.} / !-- jx:out value=#{.[4]} / -- /p /jx:forEach /p it seems that jxtemplate tries to evaluate commented out part of code,

Re: Database connection from flowscript

2003-11-28 Thread Matthias Stckel
Hi Mariusz, we encountered the same problem. Our case was a little bit different, but the results were definitely the same (1500 open connection on the DB). I think the problem is that the connection will only being returned to the pool, as soon as the continuation object gets destroyed, and

Re: Thank you

2003-11-28 Thread Ryan Hoegg
Ugo Cei wrote: Antonio Gallardo wrote: Is woody fast enough to manage the 160 fields in a form? I will be glad to hear about that. Sometimes I feel Woody is a little bit slow. I haven't done any measurements, but with 160 fields it's surely the client that slows down. Rendering that form

Re: [woody] using on-activate handlers

2003-11-28 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On 27 Nov 2003, at 23:41, Sylvain Wallez wrote: Jeremy Quinn wrote: Thanks for your response Sylvain. Hi All I am having problems using on-activate handlers. I have them attached to several buttons, but they do not really help. I have one attached to a wd:row-action id=delete

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25016] - XInclude fallback does not work, if referenced file does not exist.

2003-11-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: RELAX NG Validation with Jing

2003-11-28 Thread Michael Wechner
David Crossley wrote: Michael Wechner wrote: jing-20030619.jar Yes, please. I would but i am going soon to the Aussie bush for the w/end. ok, I have updated it within 2.1 and 2.2 Michi --David -- Michael Wechner Wyona Inc. - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya

Re: Thank you

2003-11-28 Thread juergen . seitz
Just a thought, have you ever thought about a combination of woody and the portal-engine ? Jürgen Ugo Cei

Re: Thank you

2003-11-28 Thread Ugo Cei
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: have you ever thought about a combination of woody and the portal-engine ? No, never. I've never even used the portal engine. Ugo -- Ugo Cei - Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica P.le Volontari del Sangue, 2 - 27100 Pavia - Italy Phone: +39.0382.525100 -

Re: [WIKI-UPDATE] FirstFridayDecember2003 Thu Nov 27 09:00:02 2003

2003-11-28 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Jeremy Quinn wrote: Sorry to ask the obvious, but did you start the XIndice server? It's absolutely ok to ask as I didn't do anything from hand. I only deployed the xindice.jar to WEB-INF/lib. I read something about embedded XIndice ... Embedded XIndice is new to me, it is new with

Re: Blocks build question

2003-11-28 Thread Mats Norén
Geoff Howard wrote: Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 25.11.2003 14:22, Mats Norén wrote: Hi, I´m trying to integrate an application of ours as a block, and I have a simple buildquestion: I want to filter the contents of the files which are copied to web-inf how do I go about it? If I look at the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25069] New: - ResourceReader might leave the source.InputStream open

2003-11-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25069. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25069] - ResourceReader might leave the source.InputStream open

2003-11-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25069. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25071] New: - IBM DB2 is not recognized

2003-11-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25071. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25056] - [OJB block] - JDO + Woody sample, form definition file has invalid markup

2003-11-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25056. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Apache-korea.org

2003-11-28 Thread Arje Cahn
I had a great laugh when I saw a screenshot of my own sitemap tracer application, copied in a Korean version, rebuilt and downloadable on the cocoon.apache-korea.org website (http://cocoon.apache-korea.org/application/c-tracer.html).. I have no problems with them taking my idea, but since they

The problem with image-based authentication

2003-11-28 Thread Tony Collen
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-turingtest-20031105/ The W3C has a good writeup about image-based authentication (The Cocoon samples have something like this which I implemented in Flow). They also offer some good suggestions for alternatives to IBA. At a former job, I had a coworker who was

Re: Bug in JXTemplate??

2003-11-28 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 28.11.2003 11:28, Mariusz Sieraczkiewicz wrote: Having p jx:forEach select=#{queryWrapper/data} p jx:out value=#{.} / !-- jx:out value=#{.[4]} / -- /p /jx:forEach /p it seems that

Re: Database connection from flowscript

2003-11-28 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 28.11.2003 13:32, Matthias Stöckel wrote: Hi Mariusz, we encountered the same problem. Our case was a little bit different, but the results were definitely the same (1500 open connection on the DB). I think the problem is that the connection will only being returned to the pool, as soon as

Databases in Flow

2003-11-28 Thread Miles Elam
Please forgive the staleness of this comment, but I haven't had net access at home for about a month. 4,000 messages!?! *sigh* I feel like a heroin junkie without access to a steady hit and after long last, I overdose. But I digress... This is in regard to the general sentiment

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25016] - XInclude fallback does not work, if referenced file does not exist.

2003-11-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25021] - [PATCH] ZipArchiveSerializer does not check for non existing files

2003-11-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25021. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.