DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30321] - Added RegexpHeaderSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30321] - Added RegexpHeaderSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30321] - Added RegexpHeaderSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30321] - Added RegexpHeaderSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Request headers

> "Ugo" == Ugo Cei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ugo> Il giorno 26/lug/04, alle 15:53, bernhard huber ha scritto: Ugo> Colin Paul Adams wrote: > ^.*application/xhtml\+xml.*$ Ugo> Wouldn't name="xhtml">application/xhtml\+xml have the same Ugo> effect? I think it should.

Re: Request headers

Il giorno 26/lug/04, alle 15:53, bernhard huber ha scritto: Ugo> Colin Paul Adams wrote: ^.*application/xhtml\+xml.*$ Ugo> Wouldn't Ugo> application/xhtml\+xml Ugo> have the same effect? I think it should. Yes - it does. I was checking the header accept sent by mozilla, it says:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30326] - [Patch] - ScriptableConnection doesn't cleanup SQL Resources

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30326] New: - [Patch] - ScriptableConnection doesn't cleanup SQL Resources

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Request headers

> > >> How do I run the test case? > bernhard> you have to options > > bernhard> 1 - run "build test" runs all testcases, this shall run > bernhard> your test, too. > > > I'm getting there. > But one thing I can't work - out - and that is where I define the > selector for the te

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30321] - Added RegexpHeaderSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Request headers

> "bernhard" == bernhard huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> How do I run the test case? bernhard> you have to options bernhard> 1 - run "build test" runs all testcases, this shall run bernhard> your test, too. I'm getting there. But one thing I can't work - out - and that

Re: Request headers

> How do I run the test case? you have to options 1 - run "build test" runs all testcases, this shall run your test, too. You may want to adopt tools/targets/test-build.xml, target junit-tests decreasing the number of testcases 2 - your IDE allows to run a single the testcase, or single main-clas

Re: Request headers

> "bernhard" == bernhard huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: bernhard> Copy HeaderSelectorTestCase.java to bernhard> RegexpHeaderSelectorTestCase.java, dito for bernhard> RegexpHeaderSelectorTestCase.xtest. Adopt bernhard> RegexpHeaderSelectorTestCase.xtest replacing all be

Bugzilla not available

I can't reach issues.apache.org. -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30321] - Added RegexpHeaderSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Calling web services from Cocoon

Hi Morley, I answer at Cocoon-dev as others might be interested. AFAIK there are no "current prefered method" for calling web-services. I and my colleagues, use the extended SourceWritingTransformer (SWT) and org.apache.excalibur.source.impl.HTTPClientSource that you can find in http://nagoya.ap

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30321] - Added RegexpHeaderSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30321] - Added RegexpHeaderSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30321] - Added RegexpHeaderSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Request headers

> Ugo> Colin Paul Adams wrote: > >> ^.*application/xhtml\+xml.*$ > Ugo> Wouldn't > Ugo> application/xhtml\+xml > Ugo> have the same effect? I think it should. > Yes - it does. > I was checking the header accept sent by mozilla, it says: accept = text/xml,application/xml,a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30321] - Added RegexpHeaderSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30321] New: - Added RegexpHeaderSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Request headers

Colin Paul Adams wrote: Ugo> It would be nice if you could provide unit tests for the Ugo> selector, too :-). Well, you'll have to tell me what this involves. Take inspiration from src/test/org/apache/cocoon/selection/HeaderSelectorTestCase.java for instance. Ugo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24402] - [PATCH] XML posting from SourceWritingTransformer by using an enhanced HTTPClientSource

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24402] - [PATCH] XML posting from SourceWritingTransformer by using an enhanced HTTPClientSource

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Request headers

> "Ugo" == Ugo Cei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ugo> Colin Paul Adams wrote: >> ^.*application/xhtml\+xml.*$ Ugo> Wouldn't Ugo>application/xhtml\+xml Ugo> have the same effect? I think it should. Yes - it does. >> This I think is useful. How can I contribute

Re: Request headers

Colin Paul Adams wrote: ^.*application/xhtml\+xml.*$ Wouldn't application/xhtml\+xml have the same effect? I think it should. This I think is useful. How can I contribute it to Cocoon (I've only written the java class - I don't know where I should add documentation). Open an issue on Bugzi

Re: Request headers

> "Colin" == Colin Paul Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Colin> I think I'll write a RegexpHeaderSelector. I've done this, and it works to the limit of my testing - namely one example: ^.*application/xhtml\+xml.*$ accept

Re: Request headers

> "Bernhard" == bernhard huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bernhard> hi, what about using this kind of snippet? Bernhard> name="header-name" value="accept"/> test="application/xhtml+xml"> ... Bernhard> ... I don't think so. Bernhard> you may want to read the wiki, t

Re: Request headers

hi, what about using this kind of snippet? ... ... you may want to read the wiki, too, see http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/HeaderSelector regards bernhard > (switching to the developers list) > > > "Ralph" == Ralph Goers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >

[GUMP@brutus]: cocoon-2.1/cocoon failed

ry [/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/cocoon-2.1/build/cocoon-20040726/test] -INFO- Enable "verbose" output, due to 1 previous error(s). -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -INFO- Enable "debug" output, due to build failure. -INFO- Project Reports in: /usr/local/gump/