To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project knopflerfish-framework has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project knopflerfish-log has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project knopflerfish-log has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
snip/
For example it took us some days to update from 2.1.7 to a recent 2.1.8-dev
because some things in CForms changed and broke our whole web application.
Hmm... could it be that taking CForms as an example is pure coincidence?
What was the problem?
Ok,
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
* Carsten Ziegeler:
There were several suggestions in this thread about
configuration on your side.
Indeed, Upa was right in suggesting that we use Apache as
a proxy with ProxyPass directive. The server name
* Carsten Ziegeler:
Jean-Baptiste, is your problem now solved with all the
configuration tips?
No sorry, we have a dozen sites in production, we can't afford
to change the server settings now, we prefer keeping an old
version of DefaultLinkService in WEB-INF/classes.
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Ok, that's it on *that* subject (I hope), let's get into the
technical discussion:
Both, the JSR 168 and WSRP require the functionality to switch from
http to https and back. Switching the protocol is only possible with
absolute urls (for the switch itself). That's
Upayavira wrote:
So, you get my vote for putting it into the whiteboard.
+1 also. I'm frequently asked about the recommended practices or design
patterns for a Cocoon application. So starting to have some sample
standalone applications in our SVN is a good thing.
Sylvain
--
Sylvain
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
snip/
For example it took us some days to update from 2.1.7 to a recent 2.1.8-dev
because some things in CForms changed and broke our whole web application.
Hmm... could it be that taking CForms as an example is pure coincidence?
Huh?
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
So, you get my vote for putting it into the whiteboard.
+1 also. I'm frequently asked about the recommended practices or design
patterns for a Cocoon application. So starting to have some sample
standalone applications in our SVN is a good thing.
Ralph Goers wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Ok, that's it on *that* subject (I hope), let's get into the
technical discussion:
Both, the JSR 168 and WSRP require the functionality to switch from
http to https and back. Switching the protocol is only possible with
absolute urls (for the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
snip/
For example it took us some days to update from 2.1.7 to a recent 2.1.8-dev
because some things in CForms changed and broke our whole web application.
Hmm... could it be that taking CForms as an
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Well, I was hoping you had a bookmark at hand _inside_ these specs. I'll
do my homework and dig...
No, sorry - I don't have the specs at hand; have a look at the chapters
about url creation.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, SN AG
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
I'm a total newbie on this matter, so that may be dumb questions. I
don't see how absolutizing links allows this: the result of
absolutization is that all links use the protocol that was used by the
current request, i.e. if it's http than all links will use http and
Le 20 sept. 05, à 10:57, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
...The LinkService accepts a boolean argument indicating if you want a
secure link. If this is set to true then the service switches to https.
As I said yesterday, we could create relative links if the procotol is
not changed, but there are
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
I'm a total newbie on this matter, so that may be dumb questions. I
don't see how absolutizing links allows this: the result of
absolutization is that all links use the protocol that was used by the
current request, i.e. if it's http than all
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36727.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36728.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36727.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36728.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
El vie, 16-09-2005 a las 13:48 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Author: sylvain
Date: Fri Sep 16 06:46:22 2005
New Revision: 289538
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=289538view=rev
Log:
Merge GSoC libraries and 2.1 branches
Hi sylvain,
(this time copyn' paste) ;-)
Thanks for
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Right. But AFAICS its never used. Do you have plans to update
CopletTransformer or something?
It's currently only used from the JSR 168 and the WSRP implementation.
We could add it to the CopletTransformer if there is the need.
As I said yesterday, we could create
I'm trying to use Cocoon 2.1.7 as a portal container for custom WSRP
portlets. The WSRP Support page
( http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/documentation/g1/682.html )
mentions WSRP settings in the cocoon.xconf although the Cocoon tarball I
downloaded doesn't seem to contain those settings or any
The WSRP support has been added after the 2.1.7, so you have to get the
current version from SVN (or use a nightly snapshot). Samples and sample
configuration are included.
HTH
Carsten
Ali Abd El-Aziz wrote:
I'm trying to use Cocoon 2.1.7 as a portal container for custom WSRP
portlets. The
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36466.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 14.04.2005 11:15, Upayavira wrote:
In the work I've been doing with Snapbridge recently, I came across a
rather neat GUI installer, that basically provides a front end to Ant.
Did anything result from this thread?
Christoph Hermann wrote:
Hello,
i modified the id attribute of the input in forms-calender-styling.xsl
(from svn) to make the generated html valid.
The id tag should contain -input (as all other inputs) for the
label-reference.
Thanks Christoph.
Could you put it in bugzilla please?
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 14.04.2005 11:15, Upayavira wrote:
In the work I've been doing with Snapbridge recently, I came across a
rather neat GUI installer, that basically provides a front end to Ant.
Did anything result from this thread?
Thomas Lutz wrote:
snip/
Shall I supply a patch ? Which other classes should I have a look at ?
Please do and file it in Bugzilla together with your testcase.
Thanks,
Jorg
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
El vie, 16-09-2005 a las 13:48 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Author: sylvain
Date: Fri Sep 16 06:46:22 2005
New Revision: 289538
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=289538view=rev
Log:
Merge GSoC libraries and 2.1 branches
Hi sylvain,
(this time
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Right. But AFAICS its never used. Do you have plans to update CopletTransformer
or something?
It's currently only used from the JSR 168 and the WSRP implementation.
We could add it to the CopletTransformer if there is the need.
Ok. I
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Right. Now projects that use Cocoon as a complete solution don't really
care about jsr168 and WSRP!
Everyone is free to use what he wants :) I think using standardized
portlets helps a lot in some cases.
So, restating my question as I'd really like to know, what are
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36731.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36731.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
done - Bug 36731
regards,
tom
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Thomas Lutz wrote:
snip/
Shall I supply a patch ? Which other classes should I have a look at ?
Please do and file it in Bugzilla together with your testcase.
Thanks,
Jorg
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Right. Now projects that use Cocoon as a complete solution don't really
care about jsr168 and WSRP!
Everyone is free to use what he wants :) I think using standardized
portlets helps a lot in some cases.
C'mon, I never said the
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Right. Now projects that use Cocoon as a complete solution don't
really care about jsr168 and WSRP!
You're joking right? Our plans are to use the portal for generating the
site navigation for all our various products since it is perfect for
that. The fact that it
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36732.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36732.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jorg Heymans schrieb:
Hello,
i modified the id attribute of the input in forms-calender-styling.xsl
(from svn) to make the generated html valid.
The id tag should contain -input (as all other inputs) for the
label-reference.
Could you put it in bugzilla please? This seems to have gotten buried
Sylvain,
If I recall correctly when switching back to http from https the link
also has to be absolute.
Ralph
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Yes, I already agreed to this - so someone just has to implement it
which shouldn't be that hard.
Ok, I'll do it.
Sylvain
Ralph Goers wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Right. Now projects that use Cocoon as a complete solution don't
really care about jsr168 and WSRP!
You're joking right? Our plans are to use the portal for generating
the site navigation for all our various products since it is perfect
for
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
You got me wrong: I haven't said that we should not care about jsr168
and wsrp, but that people that don't use it should not be asked to take
care about deployment issues (ProxyPreserveHost et al) that are
specifically related to these features.
As soon as you want
On 9/20/05, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If someone is still interested, I'll happily give pointers/ideas, maybe
even find the time to revisit and implement it myself. However, things
with OSGi/blocks are much clearer now than they were. Do we still need
to improve the user experience of
* Gianugo Rabellino:
I think so, Cocoon 2.1 is here to stay for a while. FWIW, a
colleague of mine (Daniele Madama) wrote a small GUI to manage
blocks selection (think make xconfig for the linux kernel). If
you deem it useful, my take is Daniele would be glad to
contribute
On 9/20/05, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gianugo Rabellino:
I think so, Cocoon 2.1 is here to stay for a while. FWIW, a
colleague of mine (Daniele Madama) wrote a small GUI to manage
blocks selection (think make xconfig for the linux kernel). If
you deem it
El mar, 20-09-2005 a las 14:43 +0200, Sylvain Wallez escribió:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
...
Can it be that there is still something missing?
Yep: I forgot to add the declaration for this new widget in the 2.1
configuration files. Should be fixed now.
Sylvain
Thanks a million,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36736.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
* Gianugo Rabellino:
I think so, Cocoon 2.1 is here to stay for a while. FWIW, a
colleague of mine (Daniele Madama) wrote a small GUI to manage
blocks selection (think make xconfig for the linux kernel). If
you deem it useful, my take is Daniele would be glad to
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On 9/20/05, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gianugo Rabellino:
I think so, Cocoon 2.1 is here to stay for a while. FWIW, a
colleague of mine (Daniele Madama) wrote a small GUI to manage
blocks selection (think make xconfig for the linux
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
That is working fine. :) Very good stuff.
Any hints how I can implement the binding?
The tree widget currently doesn't have child widgets, so binding it
doesn't really make sense.
What you should take a lot at though, is the TreeModel which is what
should be
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
You got me wrong: I haven't said that we should not care about jsr168
and wsrp, but that people that don't use it should not be asked to take
care about deployment issues (ProxyPreserveHost et al) that are
specifically related to these
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
You're right: a working getServerName() is actually needed as soon as
we want to switch protocols. But that only happens on sites mixing
http and https for urls served by Cocoon, which isn't always the case.
You'd be surprised how often you need this! Obviously, you
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36706.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ralph Goers wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
You're right: a working getServerName() is actually needed as soon as
we want to switch protocols. But that only happens on sites mixing
http and https for urls served by Cocoon, which isn't always the case.
You'd be surprised how often you need
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36728.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32783.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32988.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32158.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32994.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32994.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I volunteer to capture audio in Amsterdam, and construct a GT2005
podcast after GT. (As Torsten mentioned, a backup volunteer would be
nice to have.)
Arje, when you get back drop me a note ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and let's see if we can get a jump on figuring out what A/V
connections we have to work
66 matches
Mail list logo
