Re: [Vote Result] New committers

2006-07-12 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 12.07.2006 00:20, Upayavira wrote: Joerg, haven't seen anything about apache mail ids being created or such? Is it possible that a direct reply to your e-mail got spam filtered or went missing in someway? Should I resend? The process is you send in your ICLA by fax (or it may be possible

[jira] Created: (COCOON-1880) [PATCH] Allow LuceneIndexTransformer to index large documents (with more than 10k terms)

2006-07-12 Thread Conal Tuohy (JIRA)
[PATCH] Allow LuceneIndexTransformer to index large documents (with more than 10k terms) Key: COCOON-1880 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1880 Project: Cocoon

[jira] Updated: (COCOON-1880) [PATCH] Allow LuceneIndexTransformer to index large documents (with more than 10k terms)

2006-07-12 Thread Conal Tuohy (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1880?page=all ] Conal Tuohy updated COCOON-1880: Attachment: LuceneIndexTransformer.diff The patch adds the facility to set a max-field-length parameter, in the same way as all the other parameters. Also

Re: [2.2] New processor interface/approach

2006-07-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Peter Hunsberger wrote: Interesting. Sounds perhaps useful without the dual implementations as just simplifying the core, but the ability to plug in your own base processor also sounds interesting; if we ever go to the point where all our processing is completely database driven I take it

Re: [2.2] New processor interface/approach

2006-07-12 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Some time ago we discussed very lengthy that our core interface, the Processor, is not the best interface we ever invented. The processor should be the main entrance to the Cocoon processing engine. snip/ So, WDYT? Interesting. However, a few remarks: - how

Re: [2.2] New processor interface/approach

2006-07-12 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Carsten Ziegeler skrev: Some time ago we discussed very lengthy that our core interface, the Processor, is not the best interface we ever invented. The processor should be the main entrance to the Cocoon processing engine. As I need a simple way of adding my own processor in my project, I

Re: [2.2] New processor interface/approach

2006-07-12 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On 7/11/06, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...Basically integrating Cocoon in another framework is then a) get the cocoon spring bean container from the servlet context, b) get the processor bean from the spring container and c) invoke the processor... I like this, and pluggable

Re: [2.2] New processor interface/approach

2006-07-12 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Often you are going to need the servlet configuration and/or context and then you are back on the Servlet interface again. OTH, having a Servlet as a managed component is slightly complicated as one need to keep track on both its life cycle as a managed component and

Re: [2.2] New processor interface/approach

2006-07-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Sylvain Wallez wrote: However, a few remarks: - how is Processor different from Servlet? The interface is similar. The difference is configuration and who manages the component. If a processor is a component we can use all nice features of spring for that and I think the configuration is

Re: [2.2] New processor interface/approach

2006-07-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Often you are going to need the servlet configuration and/or context and then you are back on the Servlet interface again. OTH, having a Servlet as a managed component is slightly complicated as one need to keep track on both its life cycle as a

Re: [Vote Result] New committers

2006-07-12 Thread David Crossley
Joerg Heinicke wrote: Upayavira wrote: Joerg, haven't seen anything about apache mail ids being created or such? Is it possible that a direct reply to your e-mail got spam filtered or went missing in someway? Should I resend? The process is you send in your ICLA by fax (or it may be

Re: [2.2] New processor interface/approach

2006-07-12 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Carsten Ziegeler skrev: Sylvain Wallez wrote: However, a few remarks: - how is Processor different from Servlet? The interface is similar. The difference is configuration and who manages the component. If a processor is a component we can use all nice features of spring for that and I

[jira] Subscription: COCOON-open-with-patch

2006-07-12 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: COCOON-open-with-patch (82 issues) Subscriber: cocoon Key Summary COCOON-1880 [PATCH] Allow LuceneIndexTransformer to index large documents (with more than 10k terms) http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1880 COCOON-1879 Make fd:field

Re: [2.2] New processor interface/approach

2006-07-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Don't think this is the best way to do it. The current MountTableProcessor means that you only can mount SitemapProcessor and no other kinds of controllers, as it explicitly manage the creation of the SitemapProcessors. IMO it is better to let the component

Re: [2.2] New processor interface/approach

2006-07-12 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Carsten Ziegeler skrev: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Don't think this is the best way to do it. The current MountTableProcessor means that you only can mount SitemapProcessor and no other kinds of controllers, as it explicitly manage the creation of the SitemapProcessors. IMO it is better to

Re: [2.2] New processor interface/approach

2006-07-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Are you using so many sitemap processors so that becomes a problem? We have something like that today. The tree processor is configured as a component, or will a Spring bean configuration be much more verbose? No, the spring bean config might look the same (more or

Re: [Vote Result] New committers

2006-07-12 Thread Peter Hunsberger
On 7/12/06, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joerg Heinicke wrote: Upayavira wrote: Jim last recorded a batch on 2006-07-07. Peter this sounds strange. Fax it again. If it is back-to-front or unreadable then nothing that Jim can do. Our Fax machine prints out little images of what

Cocoon Short Message Service

2006-07-12 Thread Omar Adobati
Good morning, I'd like to manage in some way the sms sending using cocoon, but I have not easy clear ideas on how to realize this. Does anyone know the best, or maybe the not worst, way to try to implement this function? Suppose I have an XML file with all the information I need to generate the

Re: [Vote Result] New committers

2006-07-12 Thread Peter Hunsberger
On 7/12/06, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joerg Heinicke wrote: Upayavira wrote: Jim last recorded a batch on 2006-07-07. Peter this sounds strange. Fax it again. If it is back-to-front or unreadable then nothing that Jim can do. Our Fax machine prints out little images of what

Re: [2.2] New processor interface/approach

2006-07-12 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Carsten Ziegeler skrev: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Are you using so many sitemap processors so that becomes a problem? We have something like that today. The tree processor is configured as a component, or will a Spring bean configuration be much more verbose? No, the spring bean config

Re: [2.2] New processor interface/approach

2006-07-12 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Carsten Ziegeler skrev: Sylvain Wallez wrote: However, a few remarks: - how is Processor different from Servlet? The interface is similar. The difference is configuration and who manages the component. If a processor is a component we can use all nice

FW: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Cocoon Core

2006-07-12 Thread Jorg Heymans
FYI I rebuilt the continuum server over the weekend and forgot to enable mailing list notifications - this is fixed now. It seems that core did not build last night ? Jorg Online report : http://localhost:8080/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Cocoon Core

2006-07-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online report : http://localhost:8080/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/178/buildId/214 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 03:06:12 + Finished at: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 03:08:02 + Total time: 1m 49s