Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8185&projectId=51
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 21:01:12 -0700
Finished at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 21:02:34 -0700
Total time: 1m 22s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build N
Felix Knecht wrote:
4. Let's start working on 2.3 in trunk with clearly set of general features we
would like to see in
clearly set time-frame with preference of time-frame over feature-set. I mean,
if something does not
make it into 2.3 in planned time-frame it must be rescheduled for 2.4. At
I definitely think you misunderstood my point. As Vadim rightly pointed
out, I should have ONLY been talking about 2.2 (i.e. trunk). See below
for more.
Grzegorz Kossakowski said:
> Vadim Gritsenko pisze:
>> Ralph Goers wrote:
>>> Unless the -1 is rescinded I fear *2.2* will be stuck at 1.4 unt
Grzegorz Kossakowski pisze:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having trouble with our current logging solutions in trunk. I wonder how
> to configure logging
> the way that I get all debug messages from both Cocoon and Spring. When it
> comes to Cocoon logging I
> guess that it's controlled by org.apache.cocoon.
Hi,
I wanted to post a blog post about my own tools-set for working with Cocoon 2.2
but because of lack
of time I'll do it later. One important and nice tool I wanted to talk about
was q4e plug-in[1].
Even though I have really pleasant experiences with this plug-in from the past
I don't recomm
> 4. Let's start working on 2.3 in trunk with clearly set of general features
> we would like to see in
> clearly set time-frame with preference of time-frame over feature-set. I
> mean, if something does not
> make it into 2.3 in planned time-frame it must be rescheduled for 2.4. At the
> same
Vadim Gritsenko pisze:
> Ralph Goers wrote:
>> Unless the -1 is rescinded I fear *2.2* will be stuck at 1.4 until
>> 2010.
>
> Here, fixed it for you :)
>
> You are saying it like a bad thing. Cocoon 2.1 will be stuck at Java 1.3
> until cows come home. And Cocoon 1.8.2 will be stuck at... Well,
Leszek Gawron pisze:
> Lately I keep getting these:
>
>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.mozilla.javascript.NativeObject
>> at com.mobilebox.smart.model.Contractor.equals(Contractor.java:335)
>> at java.util.ArrayList.remove(ArrayList.java:424)
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.collections
Ralph Goers wrote:
Unless the -1 is rescinded I fear *2.2* will be stuck at 1.4 until
2010.
Here, fixed it for you :)
You are saying it like a bad thing. Cocoon 2.1 will be stuck at Java 1.3 until
cows come home. And Cocoon 1.8.2 will be stuck at... Well, you get an idea. I'm
completely expe
> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:08:52 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> J2SE 1.4.2 began its end of life process Dec 11 2006 and is expected to
> complete it for the summer of 2008 http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/.
Sun's isn't the only JVM, you know...
According to
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/w
I agree. I am optimistic adn believe people opinions changes with time.
I would like to start a new vote since we have now a new jave version
scenario in front of us. :)
wdyt?
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
Ralph Goers escribió:
Carsten Ziegeler said:
Although I guess everyone underst
Carsten Ziegeler said:
> Although I guess everyone understood what I meant above, just a
> clarification: of course I meant that it only makes sense to stick with
> 1.4 if the people working on and using 2.2 *with jdk 1.4* is a critical
> mass. There is no doubt that currently there are many peopl
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Hmm, although I don't want to start a heated discussion about 1.4 or 1.5
> for 2.2 again, I think there is a lot of truth in the above statement.
> It only makes sense to stick with 1.4 if the people working on and using
> 2.2 is a critical mass.
>
Although I guess everyo
Antonio Gallardo skrev:
Carsten Ziegeler escribió:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: reinhard
Date: Tue Sep 25 01:55:55 2007
New Revision: 579132
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579132&view=rev
Log:
disable this testcase since it doesn't run through with Java 1.4.
The problem is that
Carsten Ziegeler escribió:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: reinhard
Date: Tue Sep 25 01:55:55 2007
New Revision: 579132
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579132&view=rev
Log:
disable this testcase since it doesn't run through with Java 1.4. The problem
is that the included
Spring conf
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8086&projectId=51
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 06:01:12 -0700
Finished at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 06:02:24 -0700
Total time: 1m 12s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build N
Dear Vadim,
Many thanks! This makes definitively sense for me. Although I'm not a core
cocoon hacker, I will participate at the hackaton days. It's up to you guy
of the organisation committee to schedule this important input. From my
point of view it should find a place also on Friday.
Raffaele
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8079&projectId=51
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 05:01:41 -0700
Finished at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 05:03:18 -0700
Total time: 1m 36s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build N
trampus wrote:
Merico Raffaele wrote:
The main reason because I have planned to be in Rome at the CocoonGT was
to
hear a lot on Cocoon 2.2 and to get important information on the migration
path (2.1 to 2.2)
I agree with you...
I will bring a "Cocoon 2.2 Classic" presentation - how to mi
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8065&projectId=51
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 04:00:41 -0700
Finished at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 04:01:49 -0700
Total time: 1m 8s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Nu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8058&projectId=51
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 03:01:38 -0700
Finished at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 03:02:42 -0700
Total time: 1m 4s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: reinhard
> Date: Tue Sep 25 01:55:55 2007
> New Revision: 579132
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579132&view=rev
> Log:
> disable this testcase since it doesn't run through with Java 1.4. The
> problem is that the included
> Spring configuration files
22 matches
Mail list logo
