Sorry, just to clarify: [+1] on
reviving/maintaining Cocoon 2.3+, meaning that you volunteer to be somehow
involved. Main point for us never considering C3 was that it somehow never left
alpha state and that it did not support cocoon forms AFAIKT
Cheers, Gabriel
Gesendet von Outlook für
Even if in the end we decide to keep 2.3.x running, we probably should go
through the module list and retire some of the modules. I know that for some I
couldn’t update to good versions, as the technology they use was abandoned. So,
cutting the hair of our modules, might be necessary.
Chris
