Re: [Proposal] New Block building system

2004-11-01 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: I think it can provide a smooth transition from current blocks to RealBlocks and the work can be done in incremental steps. Agreed. Stefano and others, What do you think, should I continue with the new block build system? Go right ahead. Ok. So

Re: [Proposal] New Block building system

2004-10-30 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Reinhard wrote: ... Stefano and others, What do you think, should I continue with the new block build system? You are doing the work, the work is well done, what can I say... go ahead :-) -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent -

Re: [Proposal] New Block building system

2004-10-29 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: More information and explanations can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonBlockBuilder [not critizing, just curious] can you explain why you think that having block/lib is going to be jar hell while lib/block is not? I would really like

Re: [Proposal] New Block building system

2004-10-29 Thread Leszek Gawron
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: More information and explanations can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonBlockBuilder [not critizing, just curious] can you explain why you think that having block/lib is going to be jar hell while lib/block is not? you can have one

Re: [Proposal] New Block building system

2004-10-29 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Leszek Gawron wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: More information and explanations can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonBlockBuilder [not critizing, just curious] can you explain why you think that having block/lib is going to be jar hell while lib/block is

Re: [Proposal] New Block building system

2004-10-29 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: More information and explanations can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonBlockBuilder [not critizing, just curious] can you explain why you think that having block/lib is going to be jar hell while lib/block is

Re: [Proposal] New Block building system

2004-10-29 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Reinhard Pÿfff6tz wrote: --- Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: More information and explanations can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonBlockBuilder [not critizing, just curious] can you

[Proposal] New Block building system

2004-10-28 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Because of my two or three commit messages this afternoon you might have seen that I started with a prototyp (currently a proof of concept) for a new Block build system. As some of you know, I'm not really satisfied with the existing one, especially it's not possible to deal with blocks as

Re: [Proposal] New Block building system

2004-10-28 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Reinhard Poetz wrote: More information and explanations can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonBlockBuilder [not critizing, just curious] can you explain why you think that having block/lib is going to be jar hell while lib/block is not? -- Stefano. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME