mmh, ok i didn't understood all the differences for what a OSGi-based
cocoon is useful yet. But i think it would be a pity not to call it
cocoon. In the end is there only the OSGi-based version of cocoon? Or
are there two different versions? In the first case cocoon 3 sounds
reasonable, and
Reinhard Poetz schrieb:
hat type=neutral mode=on
Since the GT in Amsterdam, when Daniel used Cocoon 3.0 for his proposal of
an
OSGi based Cocoon, we have been talking about Cocoon 3.0 in different ways.
For
example in the meantime Sylvain used Cocoon 3.0 as the subject of the
discussion
* Sylvain Wallez:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
My ideas, which are progressing slowly because of the lack of
time, are really diverging from the current code base. So, if
they one day come to life, I doubt they will deserve the name
Cocoon.
I'm looking forward to
hat type=neutral mode=on
Since the GT in Amsterdam, when Daniel used Cocoon 3.0 for his proposal of an
OSGi based Cocoon, we have been talking about Cocoon 3.0 in different ways. For
example in the meantime Sylvain used Cocoon 3.0 as the subject of the
discussion that he started in December.
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
I slightly prefer Cocoon 3.0 as we/I have been using it for a long
time for OSGi based Cocoon and Daniel and I are sure that OSGi-based
Cocoon can be the platform to implement many ideas that were raised in
Sylvain's Cocoon 3.0 thread.
My ideas, which are progressing
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
My ideas, which are progressing slowly because of the lack of time, are
really diverging from the current code base. So, if they one day come to
life, I doubt they will deserve the name Cocoon.
I'm looking forward to hearing from your ideas. I think that the
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
My ideas, which are progressing slowly because of the lack of time,
are really diverging from the current code base. So, if they one day
come to life, I doubt they will deserve the name Cocoon.
I'm looking forward to hearing from your ideas. I
On 5/8/06, Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...WDOT, should we use Cocoon 3.0 for OSGi based Cocoon or find a code name...
I'd go for Cocoon 3 as the official name, Cocoon 3.0 as the first release.
It's still Cocoon, with many of the same things, yet fairly different
inside, so a
