Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Those tests do not involve any sitemap processing, so
JXTemplateGenerator is not involved. It's more likely that the upgrade
of the XML libs [1] caused this not quite unwanted side effects
(removing a marked DIRTY HACK). But this commit was on 27th of November.
If
Carsten Ziegeler escribió:
I am not so firm in ASF rules. Does the one who called the vote have
the right to withdraw the motion? Or does somebody else want to call a
vote to undo this vote?
I think you can just withdraw the vote (if you would have a vote to undo
a vote, someone could
Vadim Gritsenko escribió:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Perhaps we should rethink this drop jdk1.3 support stuff, remove the
comment from the status file and get 2.1.10 out.
get 2.1.10 out, close 2.1.x branch, and work on getting 2.2 out - i'm
completely +1 on this line of thinking. Why do we need
Hi Alfred,
Alfred Nathaniel escribió:
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 16:24 +0100, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Perhaps we should rethink this drop jdk1.3 support stuff, remove the
comment from the status file and get 2.1.10 out.
I agree.
I agree, too.
The
I removed the dependency on batik-1.5-fop, thanks for spotting the
problem. I haven't done much testing yet, please report if there are any
problems.
/Daniel
Bart Molenkamp skrev:
Hi,
I found a problem with the cocoon-batik-impl block. When I add a
dependency to this block, I end up with
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Patrick Refondini wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
The root servlet should be mounted at not /. Alexander had the
same problem. So even if I find the current behavior intuitive, no
one else seem to agree ;). So we should probably have special
IMPORTANT: I reassembled the release as I included recent changes:
a) Added the fixes for the failing junit tests in cforms
b) Added the patch for a failing xsp soap sample
c) Removed the remark about jdk 1.3
So, you can download the new version from
http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/cocoon/
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
As recently discussed
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11659205261r=1w=2), I rebuilt
org.apache.cocoon:cocoon:2, our root POM again. Compared to the first
artifact, that we voted on, I changed the tagBase to
It seems to work. Thanks for that.
However, I think I found another problem related to Eclipse. Batik has a
dependency to rhino:js:1.5R4.1, but cocoon-core has a dependency to
rhino:js:1.6R5. When I build my block, or when I build from the root
pom, Maven builds against 1.6R5 (it removes 1.5R4.1
Bart Molenkamp wrote:
It seems to work. Thanks for that.
However, I think I found another problem related to Eclipse. Batik has a
dependency to rhino:js:1.5R4.1, but cocoon-core has a dependency to
rhino:js:1.6R5. When I build my block, or when I build from the root
pom, Maven builds against
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
On a separate issue, as David pointed out some time ago, we have
to make the files available at http://www.apache.org/dist/cocoon/
too.
I'd say the jar files (cocoon-core, cocoon-template-impl,
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
I think it's time to release the next milestone of some of our modules:
- org.apache.cocoon:cocoon(pom)
- org.apache.cocoon:cocoon-core-modules (pom)
- org.apache.cocoon:cocoon-core (jar)
-
Ok, I found http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MECLIPSE-122.
Seems to be fixed, but not yet released... (looking at
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-eclipse-plu
gin/
Bart.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Bart Molenkamp
Verzonden: dinsdag 19 december 2006 11:19
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko escribió:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Perhaps we should rethink this drop jdk1.3 support stuff, remove the
comment from the status file and get 2.1.10 out.
get 2.1.10 out, close 2.1.x branch, and work on getting 2.2 out - i'm
completely +1 on this line of
On 12/19/06, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...IMPORTANT: I reassembled the release as I included recent changes...
Sorry to rain on this party again, but Junit tests in your release
candidates fail on non-Windows systems, due to debugging statements
which try to create files like
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 12/19/06, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...IMPORTANT: I reassembled the release as I included recent changes...
Sorry to rain on this party again, but Junit tests in your release
candidates fail on non-Windows systems, due to debugging statements
Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacretaz at apache.org writes:
Sorry to rain on this party again, but Junit tests in your release
candidates fail on non-Windows systems, due to debugging statements
which try to create files like d:/enum.xml.
Oh, sorry for this. Needed this for comparing the files.
+1
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
Yes, that works! Thanks!
Bart.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Reinhard Poetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag 19 december 2006 11:26
Aan: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Onderwerp: Re: [2.2] Duplicate (and different) versions of batik on
classpath
Bart Molenkamp wrote:
It
On 12/19/06, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...So here are the md5's:
MD5 (cocoon-2.1.10rc-src.zip) = 3dfee1d2d8b5f3e761eb763809249073
MD5 (cocoon-2.1.10rc-src.tar.gz) = d073b36274ab359b59bbb760e083a934...
Thanks Carsten, and thanks Joerg for the bugfixing.
+1 on the release.
On
My +1 too.
Many thanks guys.
regards Jeremy
On 19 Dec 2006, at 12:46, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Thanks Carsten, and thanks Joerg for the bugfixing.
+1 on the release.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Here is my (non-binding) +1 :-)
Kind regards,
Jeroen Reijn
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
My +1 too.
Many thanks guys.
regards Jeremy
On 19 Dec 2006, at 12:46, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Thanks Carsten, and thanks Joerg for the bugfixing.
+1 on the release.
On 12/19/06, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMPORTANT: I reassembled the release as I included recent changes:
a) Added the fixes for the failing junit tests in cforms
b) Added the patch for a failing xsp soap sample
c) Removed the remark about jdk 1.3
So, you can download the new
[Link] NameOfMyCocoonSite
-
Key: COCOON-1972
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1972
Project: Cocoon
Issue Type: Wish
Components: - Documentation
Reporter: Marc Bigler
As
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1972?page=all ]
Marc Bigler updated COCOON-1972:
Summary: [www.nmf.ch] New Media Factory GmbH (was: [Link]
NameOfMyCocoonSite)
[www.nmf.ch] New Media Factory GmbH
---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1972?page=all ]
Marc Bigler updated COCOON-1972:
Summary: [Link] New Media Factory GmbH (was: [www.nmf.ch] New Media
Factory GmbH)
[Link] New Media Factory GmbH
-
On 18.12.2006 09:39, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Please cast your votes on the 2.1.10 release.
+1
Jörg
Online report :
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org:12000/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/51/buildId/1143
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:33:50 +
Finished at: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:34:03
After releasing cocoon-core-m2, I have continued to work on the documentation
again. As a first step I have started with the main site
(http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/cdocs-site-main/ or
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/dev-docs/), which will be published at
http://cocoon.apache.org.
I
+1
Cheers, Alfred.
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 02:50 -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Also given the current status, I am wondering if we should reconsider
java 1.4 as the minimum for cocoon 2.2. We should keep in mind java 1.6
is out, hence if we agree to have java 1.4 as minimum we will have to
support it for the
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So here are the md5's:
MD5 (cocoon-2.1.10rc-src.tar.gz) = d073b36274ab359b59bbb760e083a934
-0 ... meaning that i don't want to stop the release,
however i am concerned that we are not following the new
licensing which all releases after early November are
asked to
32 matches
Mail list logo
