Re: [RT] Starting 2.2

2003-08-29 Thread Jay Freeman \(saurik\)
to figure out what's going wrong (it has something to do with a branch where some files got added to the branch later and then got deleted and it doesn't know they weren't int the branch to begin with for whatever reason). Sincerely, Jay Freeman (saurik) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From

Re: [RT] Starting 2.2

2003-08-28 Thread Jay Freeman \(saurik\)
into better version control? Sincerely, Jay Freeman (saurik) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 2:18 AM Subject: RE: [RT] Starting 2.2 Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 13/8/03 16:37, Carsten

Re: [RT] Improving Sitemap and Flowscript

2003-08-23 Thread Jay Freeman \(saurik\)
Stefano: This actually gives me a feeling of defining components below the sitemap, lol. I think it's a good solution, though :). It definitly solves both my deployment of application issues and the whole complicated looking sitemap problem. Sincerely, Jay Freeman (saurik) [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [RT] Improving Sitemap and Flowscript

2003-08-20 Thread Jay Freeman \(saurik\)
-mail; this happened on the users list, though, not sure if you saw it). Sincerely, Jay Freeman (saurik) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Apache Cocoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 5:11 PM Subject: [RT] Improving Sitemap

Re: [RT] Improving Sitemap and Flowscript

2003-08-20 Thread Jay Freeman \(saurik\)
, you're back modifying the base sitemap. I would want components to be capable of going in either, and subsitemaps do that without any changes to the overall code :). Sincerely, Jay Freeman (saurik) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Antonio Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: Config File Proposal (was... sort of...: [ANN] Apache Cocoon 2.1 Released - binary??)

2003-08-17 Thread Jay Freeman \(saurik\)
Freeman (saurik) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Steven Noels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 12:19 AM Subject: Re: Config File Proposal (was... sort of...: [ANN] Apache Cocoon 2.1 Released - binary??) Jay Freeman (saurik) wrote

Config File Proposal (was... sort of...: [ANN] Apache Cocoon 2.1 Released - binary??)

2003-08-16 Thread Jay Freeman \(saurik\)
... don't break it. Sincerely, Jay Freeman (saurik) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Geoff Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 5:21 PM Subject: Re: [ANN] Apache Cocoon 2.1 Released - binary?? Sam Chance wrote

Re: Config File Proposal (was... sort of...: [ANN] Apache Cocoon 2.1 Released - binary??)

2003-08-16 Thread Jay Freeman \(saurik\)
in on the secret? :) Please? hehe Sincerely, Jay Freeman (saurik) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Jay Freeman (saurik) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 5:58 PM Subject: Config File Proposal (was... sort of...: [ANN] Apache Cocoon 2.1 Released - binary

Re: Config File Proposal (was... sort of...: [ANN] Apache Cocoon 2.1 Released - binary??)

2003-08-16 Thread Jay Freeman \(saurik\)
consider part of my app. This would also make it much easier to upgrade in the future. Are you recommending that I do all of my development as a patch to a sitemap rather than as a sitemap, and then whenever I want to test it I patch the pristine sitemap?... Sincerely, Jay Freeman (saurik) [EMAIL