On 29/mar/10, at 00:10, Cédric Damioli wrote:
[...]
BTW, for the records (and eventually some who use it page), here
at Anyware, we build an Open Source CMS around Cocoon 2.1, called
Ametys (http://www.ametys.org), which is currently in its 3.0 beta
version, also leveraging
Hi Francesco,
Sorry for the broken URL.
You have access to the SVN here : https://svn.ametys.org and to the
viewvc here : http://viewvc.ametys.org
For JCR details, its quite off topic here, but feel free to ask if you
have any questions
Regards,
Cdric
Le 29/03/2010 09:10, Francesco
Hi all,
Now that I know that the 2.1 community is alive and healthy, I'll begin
to send various patches I've collected during the last few years :-)
First of all, may someone review and eventually apply
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2286 ?
It's a very small patch allowing
El 23/03/10 16:41, Alfred Nathaniel escribió:
BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ?
Best regards,
Cédric Damioli
At my daytime job I am also still running a number of high-profile
websites with Cocoon 2.1.10. So I am very much interested in continuing
the
On 23/03/10 16:41, Alfred Nathaniel wrote:
BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ?
Best regards,
Cédric Damioli
+1
We have several applications based on Cocoon 2.1, ranging from 2.17 to
2.1.11, especially in JSR-168 portlet environments.
We also submitted some patches about
Damioli [mailto:cedric.dami...@anyware-services.com]
Sent: lundi, 22. mars 2010 20:23
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?
Hi Cocoon community,
Here at Anyware, we have dozens of Cocoon-2.1 based applications in
production.
We've hacked Cocoon a lot, so
Hi Cédric,
2010/3/22 Cédric Damioli cedric.dami...@anyware-services.com:
...I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the
Cocoon-2.1 branch ?
If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, and I
don't want to have to fork it in our own
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Cédric Damioli wrote:
...I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the
Cocoon-2.1 branch ?
If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, and I
don't want to have to fork it in our own repository
I'm +1
David Crossley wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Cédric Damioli wrote:
...I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the
Cocoon-2.1 branch ?
If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, and I
don't want to have to fork it in our own
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 20:22 +0100, Cédric Damioli wrote:
Hi Cocoon community,
...
So I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain
the Cocoon-2.1 branch ?
Apache Forrest and Apache Lenya are still based on cocoon 2.1.x. Both
communities devs are normally subscribed to
Cédric Damioli wrote:
Hi Cocoon community,
Here at Anyware, we have dozens of Cocoon-2.1 based applications in
production.
We've hacked Cocoon a lot, so that migrating to most recent releases of
Cocoon is not an option for us at the moment
Cocoon 2.1 is a *very* stable framework, especially
BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ?
Best regards,
Cédric Damioli
At my daytime job I am also still running a number of high-profile
websites with Cocoon 2.1.10. So I am very much interested in continuing
the 2.1.x branch.
But could we agree that JDK1.5 should be
Hi Cocoon community,
Here at Anyware, we have dozens of Cocoon-2.1 based applications in
production.
We've hacked Cocoon a lot, so that migrating to most recent releases of
Cocoon is not an option for us at the moment
Cocoon 2.1 is a *very* stable framework, especially the core, but I
2010/3/22 Cédric Damioli cedric.dami...@anyware-services.com:
So I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to
maintain the Cocoon-2.1 branch ? If not, I volunteer to do the
job, as this branch is important for us, and I don't want to have
to fork it in our own repository.
14 matches
Mail list logo