Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-29 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 29/mar/10, at 00:10, Cédric Damioli wrote: [...] BTW, for the records (and eventually some who use it page), here at Anyware, we build an Open Source CMS around Cocoon 2.1, called Ametys (http://www.ametys.org), which is currently in its 3.0 beta version, also leveraging

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-29 Thread Cédric Damioli
Hi Francesco, Sorry for the broken URL. You have access to the SVN here : https://svn.ametys.org and to the viewvc here : http://viewvc.ametys.org For JCR details, its quite off topic here, but feel free to ask if you have any questions Regards, Cdric Le 29/03/2010 09:10, Francesco

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-28 Thread Cédric Damioli
Hi all, Now that I know that the 2.1 community is alive and healthy, I'll begin to send various patches I've collected during the last few years :-) First of all, may someone review and eventually apply https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2286 ? It's a very small patch allowing

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-24 Thread Antonio Gallardo
El 23/03/10 16:41, Alfred Nathaniel escribió: BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ? Best regards, Cédric Damioli At my daytime job I am also still running a number of high-profile websites with Cocoon 2.1.10. So I am very much interested in continuing the

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-24 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 23/03/10 16:41, Alfred Nathaniel wrote: BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ? Best regards, Cédric Damioli +1 We have several applications based on Cocoon 2.1, ranging from 2.17 to 2.1.11, especially in JSR-168 portlet environments. We also submitted some patches about

RE: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Laurent Medioni
Damioli [mailto:cedric.dami...@anyware-services.com] Sent: lundi, 22. mars 2010 20:23 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ? Hi Cocoon community, Here at Anyware, we have dozens of Cocoon-2.1 based applications in production. We've hacked Cocoon a lot, so

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Cédric, 2010/3/22 Cédric Damioli cedric.dami...@anyware-services.com: ...I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the Cocoon-2.1 branch ? If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, and I don't want to have to fork it in our own

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread David Crossley
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Cédric Damioli wrote: ...I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the Cocoon-2.1 branch ? If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, and I don't want to have to fork it in our own repository I'm +1

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Sylvain Wallez
David Crossley wrote: Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Cédric Damioli wrote: ...I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the Cocoon-2.1 branch ? If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, and I don't want to have to fork it in our own

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 20:22 +0100, Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi Cocoon community, ... So I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the Cocoon-2.1 branch ? Apache Forrest and Apache Lenya are still based on cocoon 2.1.x. Both communities devs are normally subscribed to

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Alec Bickerton
Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi Cocoon community, Here at Anyware, we have dozens of Cocoon-2.1 based applications in production. We've hacked Cocoon a lot, so that migrating to most recent releases of Cocoon is not an option for us at the moment Cocoon 2.1 is a *very* stable framework, especially

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Alfred Nathaniel
BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ? Best regards, Cédric Damioli At my daytime job I am also still running a number of high-profile websites with Cocoon 2.1.10. So I am very much interested in continuing the 2.1.x branch. But could we agree that JDK1.5 should be

[2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-22 Thread Cédric Damioli
Hi Cocoon community, Here at Anyware, we have dozens of Cocoon-2.1 based applications in production. We've hacked Cocoon a lot, so that migrating to most recent releases of Cocoon is not an option for us at the moment Cocoon 2.1 is a *very* stable framework, especially the core, but I

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-22 Thread Peter Hunsberger
2010/3/22 Cédric Damioli cedric.dami...@anyware-services.com: So I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the Cocoon-2.1 branch ? If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, and I don't want to have to fork it in our own repository.