It's seems we have RT Time :)
With views we have a nice sitemap feature that imho can be improved
as well:
One major disadvantage currently is that views are not inherited to
subsitemaps, so I:
Views should be inherited and can be extended/overwritten in subsitemaps
like any other
On Mittwoch, August 20, 2003, at 09:07 Uhr, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
It's seems we have RT Time :)
With views we have a nice sitemap feature that imho can be improved
as well:
One major disadvantage currently is that views are not inherited to
subsitemaps, so I:
Views should be inherited
leo leonid wrote:
On Mittwoch, August 20, 2003, at 09:07 Uhr, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
It's seems we have RT Time :)
With views we have a nice sitemap feature that imho can be improved
as well:
One major disadvantage currently is that views are not inherited to
subsitemaps, so I:
Views
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Relating this to the newly introduced virtual components, we can
consider the view definition as a virtual serializer.
Example :
map:serializers
map:serializer type=xml src=oacs.XMLSerializer/
map:serializer type=pretty-xml
map:transform type=xslt
