[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 11:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Rename Rhino-with-continuations packages
Just curious: what is Rhino used for in WL and WS? Is it used in the
application space, or in the container space. In other words, can
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
This mean another official forking of the Rhino engine. That also mean
users of BEA and IBM AS will have 2 flowscript engine there, right? The
current deployed with org.mozilla.* and our one org.cocoondev.*
This can be easily traduced in more memory usage, etc. Is this
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Christopher Oliver dijo:
In order to allow the use of Flowscript on the BEA Weblogic and IBM
Websphere application servers (and possibly in other environments) I
propose that we rename the Rhino packages from org.mozilla to
org.cocoondev. The Rhino codebase used in
Reinhard:
I understand the POV. On the one hand the need to allow BEA and IBM use
Flow. I think it is great! And I am +1 here.
On the other side, I don't like the forking idea (as I don't liked it in
jisp). I know we currently use a forked version, but giving it a
official status is what I don't
Steven Noels dijo:
On 08 Mar 2004, at 03:59, Christopher Oliver wrote:
In order to allow the use of Flowscript on the BEA Weblogic and IBM
Websphere application servers (and possibly in other environments) I
propose that we rename the Rhino packages from org.mozilla to
org.cocoondev.
Who
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Reinhard:
I understand the POV. On the one hand the need to allow BEA and IBM use
Flow. I think it is great! And I am +1 here.
On the other side, I don't like the forking idea (as I don't liked it in
jisp). I know we currently use a forked version, but giving it a
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Steven Noels dijo:
On 08 Mar 2004, at 03:59, Christopher Oliver wrote:
In order to allow the use of Flowscript on the BEA Weblogic and IBM
Websphere application servers (and possibly in other environments) I
propose that we rename the Rhino packages from
Ugo Cei dijo:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
This mean another official forking of the Rhino engine. That also mean
users of BEA and IBM AS will have 2 flowscript engine there, right? The
current deployed with org.mozilla.* and our one org.cocoondev.*
This can be easily traduced in more memory
On 08 Mar 2004, at 09:39, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
IIRC the argumentation was that Cocoon is about web publishing and web
applications and not about programming language interpreters. So it
should find a different place.
Exactly.
And a forked version of a well-known open source project of a
Am Mo, den 08.03.2004 schrieb Steven Noels um 10:11:
On 08 Mar 2004, at 09:39, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
IIRC the argumentation was that Cocoon is about web publishing and web
applications and not about programming language interpreters. So it
should find a different place.
Exactly.
Stephan Michels wrote:
Am Mo, den 08.03.2004 schrieb Steven Noels um 10:11:
On 08 Mar 2004, at 09:39, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
IIRC the argumentation was that Cocoon is about web publishing and web
applications and not about programming language interpreters. So it
should find a different
Steven Noels wrote:
On 08 Mar 2004, at 03:59, Christopher Oliver wrote:
In order to allow the use of Flowscript on the BEA Weblogic and IBM
Websphere application servers (and possibly in other environments) I
propose that we rename the Rhino packages from org.mozilla to
org.cocoondev.
Who
Christopher Oliver wrote:
In order to allow the use of Flowscript on the BEA Weblogic and IBM
Websphere application servers (and possibly in other environments) I
propose that we rename the Rhino packages from org.mozilla to
org.cocoondev. The Rhino codebase used in Cocoon is currently hosted
On 08 Mar 2004, at 11:16, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Very good point. It cannot be the ASF, and cocoondev.org isn't a legal
entity that can hold a copyright. Considering that rhino+cont's single
author is Chris, he could be the copyright holder, but community-wise
this doesn't sound good.
And in
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:32:44PM +0100, Steven Noels wrote:
Maybe we could rename it into Cocoon Scripting Engine while we are at
it - as this seems to be a common usage pattern. ;-)
Now you made me LOL :)
--Tim Larson
On 08.03.2004 03:59, Christopher Oliver wrote:
In order to allow the use of Flowscript on the BEA Weblogic and IBM
Websphere application servers (and possibly in other environments) I
propose that we rename the Rhino packages from org.mozilla to
org.cocoondev. The Rhino codebase used in Cocoon
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Sorry, but, I am still -0. :-(
We are all open to better solutions, Antonio, but I personally see none.
It's not easy matter and forking is a painful thing, but we *must* do
something.
If you have a better idea, I'm all ears. Keep in mind that along with
the idea
Steven Noels wrote:
On 08 Mar 2004, at 09:39, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
IIRC the argumentation was that Cocoon is about web publishing and web
applications and not about programming language interpreters. So it
should find a different place.
Exactly.
And a forked version of a well-known open
On 08 Mar 2004, at 23:09, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
unless donated by the well-known friendly-neightbor-organization
directly, that is.
I took the plunge and started talking. See my other mail.
/Steven
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source
Steven Noels wrote:
On 08 Mar 2004, at 23:09, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
unless donated by the well-known friendly-neightbor-organization
directly, that is.
I took the plunge and started talking. See my other mail.
Thanks for doing this Steven, it is truely appreciated from my part.
--
Steven Noels wrote:
On 08 Mar 2004, at 23:09, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
unless donated by the well-known friendly-neightbor-organization
directly, that is.
I took the plunge and started talking. See my other mail.
/Steven
Hopefully that will lead to something productive. However, it still
Christopher Oliver wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
On 08 Mar 2004, at 23:09, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
unless donated by the well-known friendly-neightbor-organization
directly, that is.
I took the plunge and started talking. See my other mail.
/Steven
Hopefully that will lead to something
In order to allow the use of Flowscript on the BEA Weblogic and IBM
Websphere application servers (and possibly in other environments) I
propose that we rename the Rhino packages from org.mozilla to
org.cocoondev. The Rhino codebase used in Cocoon is currently hosted on
cocoondev.org
For reality work consideration +1
Roy Huang
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 10:59 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Rename Rhino-with-continuations packages
In order to allow the use of Flowscript on the BEA Weblogic
Christopher Oliver wrote:
In order to allow the use of Flowscript on the BEA Weblogic and IBM
Websphere application servers (and possibly in other environments) I
propose that we rename the Rhino packages from org.mozilla to
org.cocoondev. The Rhino codebase used in Cocoon is currently hosted
Christopher Oliver dijo:
In order to allow the use of Flowscript on the BEA Weblogic and IBM
Websphere application servers (and possibly in other environments) I
propose that we rename the Rhino packages from org.mozilla to
org.cocoondev. The Rhino codebase used in Cocoon is currently hosted
26 matches
Mail list logo
