Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
It seems that we need a place where we can put important changes for 2.1.5.
This is currently the renaming of woody to cocoon forms and the incompatible excalibur-logger change that might cause problems with existing installations.
Apart from putting it on the Wiki has
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
It seems that we need a place where we can put important changes
for 2.1.5.
This is currently the renaming of woody to cocoon forms and the
incompatible excalibur-logger change that might cause problems with
existing installations.
Apart from
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
So let's finally vote on this.
- do you want to add an importance=high|low|medium attribute on
action in changes.xml?
+0.5. How importance is defined - what is important and what is not?
- do you want each block to have it's own status.xml file?
-0, reduces
Le Mardi, 9 mars 2004, à 14:14 Europe/Zurich, Sylvain Wallez a écrit :
- do you want to add an importance=high|low|medium attribute on
action in changes.xml?
+1
- do you want each block to have it's own status.xml file?
+0.5
(trying to be more precise in votes: I'm for it but cannot help ATM)
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
So let's finally vote on this.
- do you want to add an importance=high|low|medium attribute on
action in changes.xml?
+0.5. How importance is defined - what is important and what is not?
Really subjective, I admit. The one that makes the change
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
So let's finally vote on this.
- do you want to add an importance=high|low|medium attribute on
action in changes.xml?
+.5
- do you want each block to have it's own status.xml file?
-0, reduces visibility.
Let's do instead:
* Do you want to
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
...
- do you want each block to have it's own status.xml file?
-0, reduces visibility.
Having a separate file doesn't mean it doesn't appear on a different
page in the docs. Cocoon has some nice features for aggregation ;-)
Sylvain,
I remember looking on this issue on the forrest list a while ago.
What about impact instead of importance?
Cheers,
Cheche
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
So let's finally vote on this.
- do you want to add an importance=high|low|medium attribute on
action in changes.xml?
- do you want each
Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
Sylvain,
I remember looking on this issue on the forrest list a while ago.
What about impact instead of importance?
Mmmh... impact has the underlying meaning that it will have some
negative effects on some existing applications, which is not the case
for 99% of
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip/
So let's finally vote on this.
- do you want to add an importance=high|low|medium attribute on
action in changes.xml?
+1
- do you want each block to have it's own status.xml file?
+1
/Daniel
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 03:37:11PM +0100, Reinhard P?tz wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So let's finally vote on this.
- do you want to add an importance=high|low|medium attribute on
action in changes.xml?
I think high|low|medium should me more meaningful or in
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip/
- do you want to add an importance=high|low|medium attribute on
action in changes.xml?
I think high|low|medium should me more meaningful or in other words
self-explaining. What about newFeature, incompatibleChange,
minorChange?
These
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
I think high|low|medium should me more meaningful or in other words
self-explaining. What about newFeature, incompatibleChange,
minorChange?
Well if the output of that is going to be just more visibility to some
actions, then this will increase complexity adding poor
On 09.03.2004 15:27, Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
Mmmh... impact has the underlying meaning that it will have some
negative effects on some existing applications, which is not the case
for 99% of changes (we are careful about back compatibility).
I was looking for a name, and I found weight as well
On 09.03.2004 14:14, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
- do you want to add an importance=high|low|medium attribute on
action in changes.xml?
+1 @importance or @impact
- do you want each block to have it's own status.xml file?
+0
Vadim wrote:
* Do you want to add a block=name attribute on action in
15 matches
Mail list logo
