Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 08/nov/05, alle ore 11:06, Sylvain Wallez ha scritto:
The framework that currently satisfies these constraints is the Dojo
toolkit. It is packed with impressive features, is developped by a
community that functions very much like Apache and has an
Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi Sylvain and other AJAX gurus ;-)
I wonder, if you heard of Taconite [1] which seems to have released
1.0 recently?
It is licensed under the Apache License, but I don't know, if it does
what we need.
It merely handles posting a form and inserting Ajax resquest
Il giorno 08/nov/05, alle ore 11:06, Sylvain Wallez ha scritto:
The framework that currently satisfies these constraints is the
Dojo toolkit. It is packed with impressive features, is developped
by a community that functions very much like Apache and has an
Apache-compatible licence.
Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 08/nov/05, alle ore 11:06, Sylvain Wallez ha scritto:
The framework that currently satisfies these constraints is the Dojo
toolkit. It is packed with impressive features, is developped by a
community that functions very much like Apache and has an
Apache-compatible
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 08/nov/05, alle ore 11:06, Sylvain Wallez ha scritto:
The framework that currently satisfies these constraints is the Dojo
toolkit. It is packed with impressive features, is developped by a
community that functions very much like Apache and
Jason Johnston wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 08/nov/05, alle ore 11:06, Sylvain Wallez ha scritto:
The framework that currently satisfies these constraints is the
Dojo toolkit. It is packed with impressive features, is developped
by a community that functions very
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 19:13 +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Jason Johnston wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 08/nov/05, alle ore 11:06, Sylvain Wallez ha scritto:
The framework that currently satisfies these constraints is the
Dojo toolkit. It is packed with
Hi Sylvain and other AJAX gurus ;-)
I wonder, if you heard of Taconite [1] which seems to have released 1.0
recently?
It is licensed under the Apache License, but I don't know, if it does
what we need.
Additionally to the list of AJAX libraries already posted [2] I found an
other one in
Hi Sylvain
I +1 your decision to roll back for the release of 2.1.8, and am very
glad you found this problem in time.
I will start brushing up on Dojo !!
best regards
Jeremy
On 15 Oct 2005, at 13:40, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Hi all,
A few days ago, I raised some concerns [1] about the
If you haven't seen this yet, this comparison of toolkits may be handy:
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Projects/AjaxLibraries
Has anyone looked at DWR?
Mark
On 15 Oct 2005, at 18:23, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 15 Oct 2005, at 17:51, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 15
Hi all,
A few days ago, I raised some concerns [1] about the Scriptaculous
JavaScript library which we started to use in the Ajax block, because of
modifications made to JavaScript base classes made by the underlying
Prototype library on which it is based.
I had no satisfying answer on the
On 15 Oct 2005, at 13:40, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
The current drawback of Dojo is that the all the spiffy effects are
there (and more [4]), but lack a close integration with background
page update. But that should be a couple of classes
And that it takes currently between 4 to 5 seconds to
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 15 Oct 2005, at 13:40, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
The current drawback of Dojo is that the all the spiffy effects are
there (and more [4]), but lack a close integration with background
page update. But that should be a couple of classes
And that it takes currently
On 15 Oct 2005, at 17:51, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 15 Oct 2005, at 13:40, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
The current drawback of Dojo is that the all the spiffy effects
are there (and more [4]), but lack a close integration with
background page update. But that should be a
14 matches
Mail list logo
