Ralph Goers wrote:
I changed the expire time from 5 to 10 and then changed the sleep time
to 11000. That got the unit test to pass.
I'm not sure what to do about this. Having a unit test rely on an
external resource is very bad practice just for this reason. Worse, if I
didn't have an active
Carsten Ziegeler pisze:
Yepp, I have no idea why it changed from local to remote. But we want to
test
the caching source and not our network connection, so we should rather
go back to something local.
+1
It's not the first time when this test causes troubles.
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
Ralph Goers pisze:
Rats. Sorry. I was trying to squeeze that in when I had free time and I
just get so used to skipping the tests since every time I've tried to
run them my build has failed. I shouldn't have assumed they were still
not working.
To be honest when I was working on this I was
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
Author: rgoers Date: Sun Jan 6 01:35:48 2008 New Revision: 609282
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609282view=rev Log: Created
XPathXMLFileModule to fix
problems with XMLFileModule. Added getAttributeValue to JXPathHelper and
changed all references
to
Rats. Sorry. I was trying to squeeze that in when I had free time and I
just get so used to skipping the tests since every time I've tried to
run them my build has failed. I shouldn't have assumed they were still
not working.
To be honest when I was working on this I was just very frustrated
Come to think of it, although it is a pretty lame excuse, the reason I
ran with tests disabled is I just cut and pasted the command line from
the README - I can never remember the format since -P allblocks isn't
something you normally do with maven. Perhaps the README should be
changed? It
OK. So using PreparedVariableResolver fixes the problems with the
dependencies. I've committed the change. But I am still getting 1 unit
test failure in cocoon core - CachingSourceTestCase is failing on line
88. How could this possibly have anything to do with what I changed?
Ralph Goers
On 08.01.2008 22:59, Ralph Goers wrote:
But I am still getting 1 unit
test failure in cocoon core - CachingSourceTestCase is failing on line
88. How could this possibly have anything to do with what I changed?
Since our Continuum build now runs successful it seems to be an issue
with your
Well, that just means I'm going to be up a while trying to figure out
why. But thanks. It's good to know that it is working again. I also
verified that the XPathXMLFileModule sample still works, so that is good.
Then I just need to write some unit tests for it. I modified my own
copy of
On 08.01.2008 23:23, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
But I am still getting 1 unit test failure in cocoon core -
CachingSourceTestCase is failing on line 88. How could this possibly
have anything to do with what I changed?
Since our Continuum build now runs successful it seems to be an issue
with
I put slashdot.org in my browser on that machine and it took quite a
while to display but it did. I notice that the unit tests pause for
quite a while on that test. I'm not sure why.
Anyway, I changed the 5 to 30 and it still fails. Should unit tests
really be going to external resources?
I changed the expire time from 5 to 10 and then changed the sleep time
to 11000. That got the unit test to pass.
I'm not sure what to do about this. Having a unit test rely on an
external resource is very bad practice just for this reason. Worse, if I
didn't have an active internet connection
Ralph Goers wrote:
I didn't know about the plugin, but yes I knew I should have put the
issue number in the commit. I just forgot to do it.
Do:
svn propedit svn:log --revprop -r609282
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk
-David
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 06.01.2008 04:35, [EMAIL
On 06.01.2008 04:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rgoers
Date: Sun Jan 6 01:35:48 2008
New Revision: 609282
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609282view=rev
Log:
Created XPathXMLFileModule to fix problems with XMLFileModule. Added
getAttributeValue to JXPathHelper and changed all
I didn't know about the plugin, but yes I knew I should have put the
issue number in the commit. I just forgot to do it.
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 06.01.2008 04:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rgoers
Date: Sun Jan 6 01:35:48 2008
New Revision: 609282
URL:
15 matches
Mail list logo
