On 22/03/2010, rwins...@apache.org rwins...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all
Here is RC6 for commons::net available for review. Thanks to Niall and Sebb
for helping with some issues around the release.
Binary compatibility has been sacrificed in a few minor cases, however it
is extremely
I'm not sure that I'm prepared to block a release for a really really trivial
point like this...
On 23 Mar 2010, at 22:42, sebb wrote:
On 22/03/2010, rwins...@apache.org rwins...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all
Here is RC6 for commons::net available for review. Thanks to Niall and Sebb
for
Thanks! You are absolutely right...the scm block is incorrect...I think the
maven release plugin may have rewritten it like this at some stage
On 22 Mar 2010, at 07:50, Grzegorz Słowikowski wrote:
Hi
I think all problems with release process came from bad scm section in your
pom.xml.
Hi Rahul,
Replies inline below:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Jacob Beard jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca wrote:
Thanks, this looks like an interesting proposal, and also a fitting
one for a Google Summer of Code (GSoC)
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
Hi.
Referring to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-356
If no one objects, I can take care of adding a
public void clearObservations() {
observations.clear();
}
method.
Best,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe,
Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
Hi.
Referring to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-356
If no one objects, I can take care of adding a
public void clearObservations() {
observations.clear();
}
+1.
Thanks.
Luc
method.
Best,
Gilles
Thanks for the feedback, guys. Sorry for the slow action on this. I
have been sick the past couple of days.
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I have completed all of the code / doco changes that I see as
necessary for 2.1. While preparing an initial RC, I ran into two
issues, that I want to get consensus on before moving forward.
1) The clirr report is ugly
On 21/03/2010, rwins...@apache.org rwins...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rwinston
Date: Sun Mar 21 04:13:09 2010
New Revision: 925727
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=925727view=rev
Log:
No nested IOException ctors in 1.5
Modified:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Jacob Beard jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca wrote:
Hi Rahul,
Replies inline below:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip/
Finally, while the document below is an ASF-specific guide to
mentoring, you may find it useful as
On 23/03/2010, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/03/2010, rwins...@apache.org rwins...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all
Here is RC6 for commons::net available for review. Thanks to Niall and
Sebb for helping with some issues around the release.
Binary compatibility has been sacrificed
On 23/03/2010, pste...@apache.org pste...@apache.org wrote:
Author: psteitz
Date: Tue Mar 23 23:45:27 2010
New Revision: 926861
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=926861view=rev
Log:
Updated release notes, download page.
Modified:
commons/proper/math/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
13 matches
Mail list logo
