Hi Joerg!
that signature is forced by implementing Map#putAll(Map)[1] method, I
didn't realize how to avoid the String extension, any contribution is
welcome!
Dankeshen, alles gute!
Simo
[1]
http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/Map.html#putAll(java.util.Map)
If someone goes and
keeps on working stuff ... well ... then that status is nullified by
merit. (not through a single commit though) I don't see a reason to
forbid svn access
dormancy should be a lean status easy to change into sandbox or
active component. dormancy should be something else
Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all guys,
OGNL site is quite ready to be put online, anyway we still miss a nice
logo! :) I just noticed that the Lucene.Net community promoted the nice
initiative of a contest[1] on 99designs, what do you think about
opening a context for OGNL logo too? Would it be
Hi Joerg,
yes indeed, but looks like there is at least an exception
(commons-math) that is more original.
Would it be an issue having custom logos? I didn't find a proper
policy about it, but I should have overlooked some detail.
Please let me know!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
On 05/19/11 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
each committer who commits to a component must add their name to the
STATUS file (or pom.xml)
I've
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
rdon...@apache.orgwrote:
On 05/19/11 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
+1
It should not be a rule.
Does anyone know Maven enough to write a svn-report like
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
*grumbles that they were ints and a previous RC candidate saw it
change to Range* :)
Change it back! ;)
Gary
My bigger complaint is the explicit casting required to pass in chars:
new
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Matthew Pocock
turingatemyhams...@gmail.com wrote:
Range is not a sub-type of pair. You can think of a pair as being an
ordered
set of 2 items. A Range is a contiguous set defined by a lower and upper
bound (which may or may not be inclusive). Given some flag
Is it wrong to assume that a Range is always a 2-dimensional set? Can
ranges ever be Nth dimensional?
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Matthew Pocock
turingatemyhams...@gmail.com wrote:
Range is not a sub-type of
2011/5/19 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
rdon...@apache.orgwrote:
On 05/19/11 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
+1
It should not be a rule.
Does
+1 to changelog-plugin, it would be nice having the svn activity published :)
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2011/5/19 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:00
I do not see why this entire project would need to go to 1.5 or 1.6, unless
Generics are
added to the core interface. The maven.compile.target property could be set
on the different
modules, so that the core interface is compiled for 1.4.2 and the JSR199 code
is compiled for 1.6.
The
Hello.
following our previous discussions, I'm ready to commit some code regarding
iterative linear solvers. I've read through the Apache web pages on the
subject, but I still have some very silly questions (I do apologize in
advance).
1. Checkstyle complains about a missing version number
On 19 May 2011 06:34, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
each committer who commits to a component must add their name to the
STATUS
sebb wrote:
On 19 May 2011 06:34, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
each committer who commits to a component must add their name to
2011/5/20 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org:
Hello.
following our previous discussions, I'm ready to commit some code regarding
iterative linear solvers. I've read through the Apache web pages on the
subject, but I still have some very silly questions (I do apologize in
advance).
On 20 May 2011 00:48, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19 May 2011 06:34, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
I don't see an issue. Reality is that we generally just couldn't come
up with good logos back in year dot :)
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Joerg,
yes indeed, but looks like there is at least an exception
(commons-math) that is more original.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
sebb wrote:
On 20 May 2011 00:48, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19 May 2011 06:34, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
21 matches
Mail list logo
