Rahul Akolkar wrote:
As Jakarta winds down, we are looking for sustainable homes for couple
of Java libraries -- BCEL [1] and JCS [2]. These aren't very different
from many Commons libraries in size, number of developers, list
traffic etc. Would Commons be interested in accepting these?
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=9009projectId=75
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 16 Jun 2011 06:49:15 +
Finished at: Thu 16 Jun 2011 06:49:31 +
Total time: 16s
Build Trigger: Schedule
- Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com a écrit :
As Jakarta winds down, we are looking for sustainable homes for
couple
of Java libraries -- BCEL [1] and JCS [2]. These aren't very
different
from many Commons libraries in size, number of developers, list
traffic etc. Would Commons be
On 2011-06-16, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
As Jakarta winds down, we are looking for sustainable homes for couple
of Java libraries -- BCEL [1] and JCS [2]. These aren't very different
from many Commons libraries in size, number of developers, list
traffic etc. Would Commons be interested in
On 16 June 2011 03:24, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
As Jakarta winds down, we are looking for sustainable homes for couple
of Java libraries -- BCEL [1] and JCS [2]. These aren't very different
from many Commons libraries in size, number of developers, list
traffic etc. Would
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
In all honesty, Rahul: For BCEL wouldn't it be better to archive it?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
As Jakarta winds down, we are looking for sustainable homes for couple
of Java libraries -- BCEL [1] and JCS [2]. These aren't very different
from
And now, after reading through the threads below: Same question for JCS?
As I see it, you got only three replies in more than one week to such
an important topic. That's not the smell of an active project?
Jochen
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/06/2011 13:07, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
In all honesty, Rahul: For BCEL wouldn't it be better to archive it?
For the record, Tomcat 7 is using a partial, package renamed fork of
BCEL but isn't doing anything that might be considered active
development. I don't think a move to the attic would
On 16 June 2011 13:07, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
In all honesty, Rahul: For BCEL wouldn't it be better to archive it?
There have been quite a few changes to BCEL since the last release
(5.2), including several this year, so if we do archive it, let's at
least do another
On 16 June 2011 13:12, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
And now, after reading through the threads below: Same question for JCS?
As I see it, you got only three replies in more than one week to such
an important topic. That's not the smell of an active project?
It could just
2011/6/16 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 16/06/2011 13:07, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
In all honesty, Rahul: For BCEL wouldn't it be better to archive it?
For the record, Tomcat 7 is using a partial, package renamed fork of
BCEL but isn't doing anything that might be considered active
snip/
Given that I have looked a bit after BCEL over the past few years here
are my two cents:
BCEL development is dead dead dead ... still people come and use it.
Why they don't use ASM is beyond me. I myself use ASM whenever I can.
For those how want easier I would suggest javassist ...if it
On 16 June 2011 14:53, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote:
snip/
Given that I have looked a bit after BCEL over the past few years here
are my two cents:
BCEL development is dead dead dead ... still people come and use it.
Why they don't use ASM is beyond me. I myself use ASM whenever I
First, I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who hadn't heard of JCS.
Considering [1], I'd say it's more relevant now than, arguably, ever.
I'd like to work on it. From the Jakarta threads, Thomas Vandahl
offered to step up, so given our low bar for existing ASF committers,
it should have enough
+1 to Matt, wise said :)
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
First, I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who hadn't heard of JCS.
Considering [1], I'd say it's more relevant now than,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:28 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
It could just be that the other interested parties are on holiday, or
that they agree with the move and don't feel the need to say so.
May be, but it should also be noted the replies came from people like
you, which are most likely
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Considering [1], I'd say it's more relevant now than, arguably, ever.
Are you sure, that's related? Reading [2], my understanding is that
JCS doesn't aim to implement JSR-107, but to be close to.
[2]
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:28 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
It could just be that the other interested parties are on holiday, or
that they agree with the move and don't feel the need to say so.
May be, but
(accidentally sent to Jochen personally before, sorry)
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Considering [1], I'd say it's more relevant now than, arguably, ever.
Are you
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
(accidentally sent to Jochen personally before, sorry)
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/16/11 8:22 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
(accidentally sent to Jochen personally before, sorry)
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Considering [1], I'd say it's more
Not sure what
factors contributed to the stagnation of BCEL development, but I like
to think of Commons as the swiss army knife for Java developers--any
library with a sharply defined surface area and, even better,
satisfying some need commonly encountered by Java developers, belongs
here
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote:
Not sure what
factors contributed to the stagnation of BCEL development, but I like
to think of Commons as the swiss army knife for Java developers--any
library with a sharply defined surface area and, even better,
Yesterday I fixed some [dbcp] problems caused by the new [pool]
requirement that setFactory can only be called once. The quotes are
because most of the problems were redundant calls to setFactory.
The reason that we left setFactory in [pool] is that [dbcp]'s
connection factory constructors call
On 16 June 2011 17:25, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Yesterday I fixed some [dbcp] problems caused by the new [pool]
requirement that setFactory can only be called once. The quotes are
because most of the problems were redundant calls to setFactory.
The reason that we left
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Point taken; however, from the when all you have is a hammer
perspective, if byte code generation/manipulation were made easy
enough, folk might use it more! ;)
Perhaps Proxy could use BCEL to implement ProxyFactory
So according to you byte code manipulation is a commonly encountered
need for java developers?
I guess then Commons should/could be the home of virtually any java
library out there.
Point taken; however, from the when all you have is a hammer
perspective, if byte code
On 6/16/11 9:32 AM, sebb wrote:
On 16 June 2011 17:25, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Yesterday I fixed some [dbcp] problems caused by the new [pool]
requirement that setFactory can only be called once. The quotes are
because most of the problems were redundant calls to setFactory.
On 16/06/2011 17:32, sebb wrote:
On 16 June 2011 17:25, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Yesterday I fixed some [dbcp] problems caused by the new [pool]
requirement that setFactory can only be called once. The quotes are
because most of the problems were redundant calls to setFactory.
On 6/16/11 10:19 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 16/06/2011 17:32, sebb wrote:
On 16 June 2011 17:25, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Yesterday I fixed some [dbcp] problems caused by the new [pool]
requirement that setFactory can only be called once. The quotes are
because most of the
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:32 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Perhaps Proxy could use BCEL to implement ProxyFactory (or whatever
it's called these days).
As Thorsten wrote, they can (and perhaps even should) use ASM. The
fact that a project might be used by yet another
On Jun 16, 2011, at 9:54, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote:
snip/
Given that I have looked a bit after BCEL over the past few years here
are my two cents:
BCEL development is dead dead dead ... still people come and use it.
Why they don't use ASM is beyond me. I myself use ASM whenever
Hi al guys,
after few activity on graph I finally brought the component in a
decent state to start speaking with the rest of the community, also
because people interested on it are waiting :)
As I expressed in the previous mail, 'commons-graph' should be a
general purpose library for working with
I think 2.0 is the opportunity to do this right. Almost like we were
designing this from scratch.
Making the factory an invariant of the pool sounds good.
Otoh If a setFactory method exists it should be implemented fully. The
throw an exception impl is pretty smelly.
Gary
On Jun 16, 2011, at
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote:
Not sure what
factors contributed to the stagnation of BCEL development, but I like
to think of Commons as the swiss army knife for Java developers--any
library with a sharply defined surface area and, even better,
On Jun 16, 2011, at 2:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Jun 16, 2011, at 9:54, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote:
With all honesty - it should switch to ASM and not look back.
Xalan uses BCEL too FWIW.
I'm not sure how that helps. From what I can tell Xalan is fairly close to
moving to
Hello Simone,
Thanks for the update, we have been waiting. Although, I had this question,
I don't see the graph being listed as a project under sandbox, now that it
is moved there. My questions was related to how to submit patches or bugs.
as I don't see the project in Jira as well. Is it ok, if
39 matches
Mail list logo
