But I feel a bit confused now regarding which changes require a a ticket
and which don't.
Any modification that have impacts to our users, such as APIs change -
in that case - a bug, a new feature, an improvement, ... worths an
issue.
Any trivial modification such as typos, missing javadoc,
+action dev=britter type=add issue=SANDBOX-438 due-to=Benedikt
Ritter
+ Implement setMapped on DefaultBeanAccessor
+/action
you can drop the `due-to` field in that case - I used the `due-to`
field when you provided patches and I took the task to review and
apply, since you
Ciao Simo,
2013/2/7 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
+action dev=britter type=add issue=SANDBOX-438
due-to=Benedikt Ritter
+ Implement setMapped on DefaultBeanAccessor
+/action
you can drop the `due-to` field in that case - I used the `due-to`
field when you
On 02/07/2013 12:04 PM, sebb wrote:
On 7 February 2013 05:24, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
OK, I was able to upload using .zip file made manually from
my local ~/.m2.
So given all seems there are some serious infra problems with nexus.
Well, I had no problems uploading a SNAPSHOT
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:46:55 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 2/6/13 9:03 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:19:47 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 2/5/13 6:08 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
In the thread about static import, Stephen noted that decisions
on a
component's evolution are dependent on
Hi Thomas!
looks like a new feature request to me and not a bug report.
I would prefer to release 1.3 and then work on promoting cli2 to proper.
I read the commit history and I think the component has matured
enough, so it's time to cut an RC and let it be voted by the PMC.
Thanks and
On 2/7/13 4:58 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:46:55 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 2/6/13 9:03 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:19:47 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 2/5/13 6:08 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
In the thread about static import, Stephen noted that decisions
on a
On Feb 7, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:01:42 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 2/7/13 4:58 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:46:55 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 2/6/13 9:03 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:19:47 -0800, Phil
2013/2/7 brit...@apache.org
Author: britter
Date: Thu Feb 7 20:13:23 2013
New Revision: 1443696
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1443696
Log:
Fixed checkstyle issues - no functional changes
Modified:
commons/sandbox/beanutils2/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils2/Argument.java
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:32:46 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 2/7/13 8:04 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:01:42 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 2/7/13 4:58 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:46:55 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 2/6/13 9:03 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013
How do you feel about this? Checkstyle complains about this, and I think it
is sufficient to tell users that an argument must not be null.
sorry, which one?
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
Sorry, but not of this is making sense to me. We had a long discussion
about how the library doesn't test for large scale problem
performance. A lot of algorithms probably do not scale well as the
result. There was talk of dropping sparse support in linear algebra.
So instead of fixing that, you
Le 07/02/2013 06:37, Mladen Turk a écrit :
Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.13 based on RC1 is ready.
It contains a fix for regression found in previous release(s).
Binaries and sources for testing are at [1], dist layout is at [2],
generated site can be found at [3]. Tag is [4] which will be
13 matches
Mail list logo
