On 02/28/2013 03:12 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
+1
my own +1
@JIRA:
this is my output from running mvn site on the RC3 tag.
the JIRA plugin is not running at all, but I have seen it failing for
other components before, e.g. commons-math
my setup:
Apache Maven 3.0.2 (r1056850; 2011-01-09
Jörg, I am new to this list and project. I have actively contributed
to VFS especially to the HTTP and Webdav parts. When I file an issue
or a request for improvement, I also publish a patch.
Where can I find the information if my patch will be
accepted/integrated in which version and when it is
Hello Jean-Marc
2013/2/28 Jean-Marc Borer jmbo...@gmail.com
Jörg, I am new to this list and project. I have actively contributed
to VFS especially to the HTTP and Webdav parts. When I file an issue
or a request for improvement, I also publish a patch.
Nice that you've joined us!
Where
Hi,
Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hello Jean-Marc
2013/2/28 Jean-Marc Borer jmbo...@gmail.com
Jörg, I am new to this list and project. I have actively contributed
to VFS especially to the HTTP and Webdav parts. When I file an issue
or a request for improvement, I also publish a patch.
2013/2/23 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi,
I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix
release or start to work on new features right away and release a 1.9
(including bug fixes of course ;-)
Benedikt
I have looked through a lot of issues in the
OK guys, thank you for your feedback. I'll provide those patches, but
it is difficult sometimes to keep up with them because the source code
in trunk changes and patches may conflict (it happened recently to me
after making a update).
Would it be possible for me to become a commiter for HTTP and
Hi,
I am planning to change the groupId/artifactId very soon to the
following name (see COLLECTIONS-382): org.apache.commons.collections4
This will also have a big impact on the serialization tests.
Just that everybody is aware whats going to happen.
Thomas
P.S. I know some people may not be
Hi,
in case people are wondering why I reopened resolved so many issues:
I am starting to complete the release notes, and want to have a clear
picture on the changes 3.2.1 - 4.0.
I hope I have now all issues related to 4.0 in the fixes / resolved
status, and will put them step by step into the
Hi,
Am 28.02.2013 14:28, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2013/2/23 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi,
I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix
release or start to work on new features right away and release a 1.9
(including bug fixes of course ;-)
Benedikt
I
+1, looks good.
Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the
download page. Is this expected to be there? I did not notice it before,
but the RAT report was complaining about it. This was not the case for
the previous RC.
Oliver
Am 27.02.2013 22:37, schrieb Thomas
On 02/28/2013 10:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
+1, looks good.
Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the
download page. Is this expected to be there? I did not notice it before,
but the RAT report was complaining about it. This was not the case for
the previous RC.
+1
2013/2/27 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC2:
* Added missing slf4j binding which caused test failures with IBM JDKs
The files:
The
I am wondering about the duplication of effort bw changes.xml and the
Jira report. Don't they show the same thing?
Gary
On Feb 28, 2013, at 15:32, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
in case people are wondering why I reopened resolved so many issues:
I am starting to
Hi,
Can someone give me karma to jira in order to assign to me and close issues ?
Or I need to create a INFRA jira ?
Thanks
--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to have some feedback on [BEANUTILS-409] - 'describe' method
returning Incorrect array value [1]. If a bean has an array or collection
property describe will only return the first entry of this member.
On 28 February 2013 17:24, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am planning to change the groupId/artifactId very soon to the
following name (see COLLECTIONS-382): org.apache.commons.collections4
This will also have a big impact on the serialization tests.
Just that
On 28 February 2013 21:26, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/28/2013 10:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
+1, looks good.
Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the
download page. Is this expected to be there? I did not notice it before,
but the RAT
On 28 February 2013 22:25, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
I am wondering about the duplication of effort bw changes.xml and the
Jira report. Don't they show the same thing?
Not all changes necessarily have an associated JIRA.
Also the JIRA Fix version is not stable; it can be
How can I update ognl website? Simple checkout [1] and update what I
need? and then what to do?
eg. RAT report is broken as it includes all the html files [2]
[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/commons/content/proper/commons-ognl/
[2]
On 03/01/2013 02:36 AM, sebb wrote:
On 28 February 2013 17:24, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am planning to change the groupId/artifactId very soon to the
following name (see COLLECTIONS-382): org.apache.commons.collections4
This will also have a big impact on the
On 03/01/2013 02:43 AM, sebb wrote:
On 28 February 2013 22:25, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
I am wondering about the duplication of effort bw changes.xml and the
Jira report. Don't they show the same thing?
Not all changes necessarily have an associated JIRA.
Also the JIRA
21 matches
Mail list logo
